jasonc_01

I remember when the days when OnePlus was the little disruptor that could, you know when one could actually afford their phones....
 
Those were the days

A whole whopping 1-3 percent and people are getting their depends in a knot. 
 
It's like margin of error type difference and then the rep decides to go rogue lol.

A whole whopping 1-3 percent and people are getting their depends in a knot. 
 
It's like margin of error type difference and then the rep decides to go rogue lol.

A whole whopping 1-3 percent and people are getting their depends in a knot. 
 
It's like margin of error type difference and then the rep decides to go rogue lol.

A whole whopping 1-3 percent and people are getting their depends in a knot. 
 
It's like margin of error type difference and then the rep decides to go rogue lol.

A whole whopping 1-3 percent and people are getting their depends in a knot. 
 
It's like margin of error type difference and then the rep decides to go rogue lol.

A whole whopping 1-3 percent and people are getting their depends in a knot. 
 
It's like margin of error type difference and then the rep decides to go rogue lol.

A whole whopping 1-3 percent and people are getting their depends in a knot. 
 
It's like margin of error type difference and then the rep decides to go rogue lol.

A whole whopping 1-3 percent and people are getting their depends in a knot. 
 
It's like margin of error type difference and then the rep decides to go rogue lol.

A whole whopping 1-3 percent and people are getting their depends in a knot. 
 
It's like margin of error type difference and then the rep decides to go rogue lol.

It's because sony always used custom processors. For PS2 and PS3 backcompat they had to actually add miniature versions of the consoles into the newer gen. Xbox has always been basically a PC and the early games were all built on DirectX which means that porting them to the newer consoles is typically a breeze. The one downside to all this is that sometimes in the porting process something breaks and it's on Microsoft to notice and fix it, but it's not like Sony even offered hardware backcompat on PS4 so I don't think they won that fight.

In progress... ?

It's getting that from allocation, not actual usage. Allocation can be detected from outside the program using the VRAM, but actual usage can only be detected from inside the program that's allocating it.

Your choosing to refer to a price drop as "normal price", which I fully disagree with.
 
The only outlier in the list is the 2080ti, kinda been the sentiment for 2 years.. unless Nvidia pull a dick move and launch a titan branded card.
I really doubt this though, there's to much room between the 3080 and 3090 not to have a 3080ti up their sleeve at hopefully $1000 and I don't see room above. I don't think that card is a 3080 20gb, not enough performance for $300. Though maybe there is a 12gb-16gb 3080 forthcoming at $799, I don't think 20gb. I think that 20gb sku is the 3080ti, ready to go is need be sooner than later
 
I

I really think the 3090 is the titan replacement, especially with that much VRAM. I've been wrong before one or twice and this is Nvidia.
 
Where your wrong though is that x80 cards have not gotten a $200 price hike. It has not, I don't under stand why people are so up in arms about this. This is back to 2012.
     Launch                          Adjusted inflation
GTX 680 $499                            $563
GTX 780 $649                            $722
GTX 980 $549                            $600
GTX 1080 $599                          $646
RTX 2080 $699                          $721
RTX 3080 $699
 
The same goes for the x70 cards, except for the launch of the 2070. 
       Launch                               Adjusted inflation
GTX 670 $399                                 $450
GTX 770 $399                                 $444
GTX 970 $329                                 $360
GTX 1070 $379                               $409
RTX 2070 $599 super $499          $618/$515
RTX 3070 $499                               
 
People have this warped perception that Nvidia is drunken sailor raising prices like crazy. The only crazy price gauging they did has been with the 2080ti, the titan but really you know what your getting into and the 2070 at launch was a reach and a slap in the face 7 months later when the 2070 super arrived at $499.

why not just solder on another one. They probably cost a few dollars? I wouldn't pay a "processional" $100 per hour to solder on a resistor, on a very old video card. Just get the resistor yourself from like digikey and solder it on

The PSU is fine.
 
 

The 680 never got a price drop when the 690 was released, the 780 was the only x80 to drop to $500. The 980 price did not change with the release of the 980ti and the 1080 only drop $100 to $599 when the 1080ti was released.
 
I just don't see your argument, not to mention you want to argue it both ways. The launch price is normal the price, it's not the go fuck yourself for buying right away price. You can't say a price drop is the normal price, cause it's not and it only happened twice. In 5 generations over 8 years.

I really think the 3090 is the titan replacement, especially with that much VRAM. I've been wrong before one or twice and this is Nvidia.
 
Where your wrong though is that x80 cards have not gotten a $200 price hike. It has not, I don't under stand why people are so up in arms about this. This is back to 2012.
     Launch                          Adjusted inflation
GTX 680 $499                            $563
GTX 780 $649                            $722
GTX 980 $549                            $600
GTX 1080 $599                          $646
RTX 2080 $699                          $721
RTX 3080 $699
 
The same goes for the x70 cards, except for the launch of the 2070. 
       Launch                               Adjusted inflation
GTX 670 $399                                 $450
GTX 770 $399                                 $444
GTX 970 $329                                 $360
GTX 1070 $379                               $409
RTX 2070 $599 super $499          $618/$515
RTX 3070 $499                               
 
People have this warped perception that Nvidia is drunken sailor raising prices like crazy. The only crazy price gauging they did has been with the 2080ti, the titan but really you know what your getting into and the 2070 at launch was a reach and a slap in the face 7 months later when the 2070 super arrived at $499.

I really think the 3090 is the titan replacement, especially with that much VRAM. I've been wrong before one or twice and this is Nvidia.
 
Where your wrong though is that x80 cards have not gotten a $200 price hike. It has not, I don't under stand why people are so up in arms about this. This is back to 2012.
     Launch                          Adjusted inflation
GTX 680 $499                            $563
GTX 780 $649                            $722
GTX 980 $549                            $600
GTX 1080 $599                          $646
RTX 2080 $699                          $721
RTX 3080 $699
 
The same goes for the x70 cards, except for the launch of the 2070. 
       Launch                               Adjusted inflation
GTX 670 $399                                 $450
GTX 770 $399                                 $444
GTX 970 $329                                 $360
GTX 1070 $379                               $409
RTX 2070 $599 super $499          $618/$515
RTX 3070 $499                               
 
People have this warped perception that Nvidia is drunken sailor raising prices like crazy. The only crazy price gauging they did has been with the 2080ti, the titan but really you know what your getting into and the 2070 at launch was a reach and a slap in the face 7 months later when the 2070 super arrived at $499.

You say it like if we ask to pay less they'll Listen. In reality we are paying less, the 3090 is a $1000 price reduction and a 3080 ti would be a $200 less than a 2080ti. 

it is fully a class replacement card. for a long time this was where the titain sat. now the titain is a 3k quadro with no ECC and uses more power.

If and AMD had balls and the confidence in RDNA2 to really take on Nvidia they would announce it next week before the 3080 goes on sale. Give buyers another option right before the launch, that would be a confident shot across the bow.
 
October launch sounds like they can only compete with the mid range, but we'll off of the 3080. 
 
This is kind of a bummer. I was hoping AMD would have a real competitor for the 3080 and force Nvidia to drop a slightly cut down 3090  with Less VRAM as a 3080ti at the $1000 price point.
 
Oh well at least AMD didn't hype it up this tome

I really think the 3090 is the titan replacement, especially with that much VRAM. I've been wrong before one or twice and this is Nvidia.
 
Where your wrong though is that x80 cards have not gotten a $200 price hike. It has not, I don't under stand why people are so up in arms about this. This is back to 2012.
     Launch                          Adjusted inflation
GTX 680 $499                            $563
GTX 780 $649                            $722
GTX 980 $549                            $600
GTX 1080 $599                          $646
RTX 2080 $699                          $721
RTX 3080 $699
 
The same goes for the x70 cards, except for the launch of the 2070. 
       Launch                               Adjusted inflation
GTX 670 $399                                 $450
GTX 770 $399                                 $444
GTX 970 $329                                 $360
GTX 1070 $379                               $409
RTX 2070 $599 super $499          $618/$515
RTX 3070 $499                               
 
People have this warped perception that Nvidia is drunken sailor raising prices like crazy. The only crazy price gauging they did has been with the 2080ti, the titan but really you know what your getting into and the 2070 at launch was a reach and a slap in the face 7 months later when the 2070 super arrived at $499.