Shan-Dysigns

Is this a serious question?

It's like your computer is homeless.

It's like your computer is homeless.

It's like your computer is homeless.

It's like your computer is homeless.

It's like your computer is homeless.

It's like your computer is homeless.

They wouldn't have any legal grounds to sue (even if they wanted) - I know this wasn't part of this thread. If one has nothing to do with the creation, they have no grounds for any kind of copyright or creative rights.

Did you create the WASD graphic with a colored background (trying to match the color of the shirt)? If so, just create the WASD graphic (with no background) and save as .png (or .gif). As mentioned, the word spacing is way too close. I would make the letters fatter and spaced out more, but being on the front you have limited space. What about putting that phrase on the back instead (just the WASD graphic on front - then you can make the graphic larger too).

Well, in terms of Psychology (if you really want to go there), loving violent events but having tender emotions over real-life death usually means that you have some kind of wall between what is real and what is perceived as real. I am sure that you have heard many stories where people blame violent games to cause some people to become violent. This can be the case just as the total opposite. Some people who love virtual violence can be the most tender-hearted people in real life. The same scenario for people who are overly built, who work out constantly and try to be as rugged as they can in public - but when in private they may allow themselves to be pampered with manicures, cry along with their girlfriend/boyfriend, etc...
 
So, in terms of psychology it could be something to keep an eye on (so that you don't get sucked into the stereotypical virtual world of non-reality versus real life), but like I said, for some people this notion could not be further from the truth.
 
I guess my blabbering point is that you might be surprised just how many people feel the same way as you - love the online violence, but may be more tender about real life happenings.

Well, that should clear things up!

It could also be a sign that something is wrong with your graphics card. I had similar issues a while back, but after troubleshooting my monitor to death, it ended up being an issue with my graphics card.

It could also be a sign that something is wrong with your graphics card. I had similar issues a while back, but after troubleshooting my monitor to death, it ended up being an issue with my graphics card.
 
I don't know why this posted twice, sorry.

Wow! You call my response "conflict"? I don't even think it rises to the level of constructive criticism (because I wasn't criticizing; I was simply commenting on the fact that I believe there is more to say in solving the OP's question). I mean, if you want to get technical (since I'm apparently here to cause conflict), I'm not sure why you would use "inline" to bring back the div's appearance instead of "block", but again, there is missing HTML code so it's hard to understand what he wants in context. He mentioned "panel" and "collapsing". Just making an element's display property "disappear" doesn't really give the effect of a panel collapsing or expanding. Panels open and close, not disappear and reappear. If the OP just wants the panel to appear then disappear, then fine, but that's not what I think of when I hear the words "collapsing panel". With me and my conflicting response, all I'm going to say then is if your explanation solved the OP's question, then that's all that matters. I'm not here to battle wits or ego. I just believe there is more to be said to solve this question. What I don't understand is that your very first comment was "Yes that is true...", but then you have issue with what I said? How is that conflict when you agreed with me?
 
Can you please show me with the OP's code and your first response how that would result in a working collapsing panel.
Thanks.

Here is the thing:  If you are worrying about price to performance ratio THIS CARD IS NOT FOR YOU!  If a person can afford to live this lifestyle and could give a damn about price to performance to ratio, then nothing but the best is probably what you are looking for.  If you have YOUR priorities straight, then you know what you can or can't afford.  To say something is a waste of money because YOU can't afford or YOU think the price to performance ratio is shit is irrelevant. 

For me it's not a waste at all. For me it is finally 4K enjoyable without exceptions. And without being mean, I think my financial status is and will never be here for discussion .

I wasn't angry at all. I use sarcasm as my weapon of choice.

It's a word used a lot in law-speak (therefore, hence, a conclusion). I was trying to be playfully annoying by over-using that word.

Uh, yeah, and when ads are stuck at the end of the video, what do you think happens the second a viewer hears the "video wrap-up"? That's right, they exit the video - ergo they don't see the ad - ergo the ad company doesn't reach one more person that might actually buy their service - ergo they don't make as much money - ergo the company can't support other companies like Linus - ergo Linus goes out of business - ergo you have no more videos to watch and have to find someone else to play Burger King with you. That's a lot of ergos. I hope you can see the fault in your desire to place ads at the end of the videos.
 
Since I joined this forum over a month ago, I have never seen so many people (in any kind of scenario) complain about getting things for free. The world of entitlement has run a mock, ergo (had to get one more in).

Perhaps... but paying people to work with you is only the tip of the iceberg... you can't make everyone happy, but people still complain about free content. I don't understand that.

It's funnier when you have a long pause after saying "6 inches" and then add "from the ground".

I went through the sign-up process, sat through having to select three channels to follow (even though I could "add or change them later", I couldn't - who the hell are 99% of these people?). I had to pick three to move "next". After all that, I choose one of the Titan X videos. Stupid Vessel says "opps, your browser needs to be updated to its latest version". Uh, I'm already updated (Firefox). Is this service browser specific or just not ready for prime-time?

My scroll wheel just broke.

Yes, Stardock has MANY interesting add-ons.

Just remember to save your layout each time you add/remove/move your icons.