Jump to content

Metal Gear Solid V: Phantom Pain PC System Requirements Revealed

blackmalicious

Minimum:
OS: Windows 7x64, Windows 8x64 (64-bit OS Required)
Processor: Intel Core i5-4460 (3.40 GHz) or better; Quad-core or better
Memory: 4 GB RAM
Graphics: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 (2GB) or better (DirectX 11 card Required)
DirectX: Version 11
Hard Drive: 28 GB available space
Sound Card: DirectX 9.0c compatible sound card

Recommended:
OS: Windows 7x64, Windows 8x64 (64-bit OS Required) Processor: Intel Core i7-4790 (3.60GHz) or better; Quad-core or better
Memory: 8 GB RAM
Graphics: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 (DirectX 11 graphic card required)
DirectX: Version 11
Hard Drive: 28 GB available space
Sound Card: DirectX 9.0c compatible sound card (Surround Sound 5.1)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Why is it that we need i7s allnof a sudden?

Are devs getting lazy with optimization or are games evolving?

Lol ikr...Can my pc run the game (Sorry)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Dat processor requirement.

CPU: Intel i5 3550           | Cooler: Corsair A50          | Motherboard: Asus P8Z77      | Storage: Crucial MX200 250GB |

RAM: Corsair Vengeance 8GB   | GPU: GTX 1650                | Case: NZXT H440 (Red/Black)  | PSU: EVGA 650W G2            |

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm noticing a pattern. Bad ports have exceedingly high minimum requirements (CoD Ghosts, Arkham Shite, etc.).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm noticing a pattern. Bad ports have exceedingly high minimum requirements (CoD Ghosts, Arkham Shite, etc.).

Metal Gear Solid V: Ground Zeroes was an amazing demonstration of the performance possibilities of the Fox Engine. If Phantom Pain is on the same engine, then presumably, we should have ourselves a very nice game that performs very well. The high requirements are likely due to the evolving state of games, and how it appears that the latest MGS wants to push the graphical boundaries a bit. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Metal Gear Solid V: Ground Zeroes was an amazing demonstration of the performance possibilities of the Fox Engine. If Phantom Pain is on the same engine, then presumably, we should have ourselves a very nice game that performs very well. The high requirements are likely due to the evolving state of games, and how it appears that the latest MGS wants to push the graphical boundaries a bit. 

I normally take "reccomended" to mean "Medium setting 1080p 60fps", and i7s are fucking expensive. Not to mention the 760 is still a damn good card.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

I normally take "reccomended" to mean "Medium setting 1080p 60fps", and i7s are fucking expensive. Not to mention the 760 is still a damn good card.

can i run it thoe?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Metal Gear Solid V: Ground Zeroes was an amazing demonstration of the performance possibilities of the Fox Engine. If Phantom Pain is on the same engine, then presumably, we should have ourselves a very nice game that performs very well. The high requirements are likely due to the evolving state of games, and how it appears that the latest MGS wants to push the graphical boundaries a bit. 

can i run it thoe?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

No AMD cards on minimum nor recommended specs, I think it'll have other-the-top requirements for AMD cards, like HD 7850 for minimum specs and R9 280X or 290 for recommended and it's gonna run like shit on AMD cards. Nvidia offering the game with their cards is never a good thing for AMD users.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

No AMD cards on minimum nor recommended specs, I think it'll have other-the-top requirements for AMD cards, like HD 7850 for minimum specs and R9 280X or 290 for recommended and it's gonna run like shit on AMD cards. Nvidia offering the game with their cards is never a good thing for AMD users.

Oh no. :( Except... It's based on the Fox Engine. Which ran fine on AMD. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

ran

Past experiences with a specific engine or game doesn't mean shit. Arkham games used to run just fine, then Arkham Crap came. If it ran fine in the past it doesn't mean that it'll run fine now.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Past experiences with a specific engine or game doesn't mean shit. Arkham games used to run just fine, then Arkham Crap came. If it ran fine in the past it doesn't mean that it'll run fine now.

It also doesn't mean it's going to be shit because NVIDIA is slapping their sticker on the box, and throwing some GameWorks in so that the foliage can react to the horse's legs. There's being pessimistic, being realistic, and being optimistic. I'm being realistic, and you're being pessimistic. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

It also doesn't mean it's going to be shit because NVIDIA is slapping their sticker on the box, and throwing some GameWorks in so that the foliage can react to the horse's legs. There's being pessimistic, being realistic, and being optimistic. I'm being realistic, and you're being pessimistic.

Actually, we're both being realistic, to a degree.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Actually, we're both being realistic, to a degree.

I can't purchase Batman: Arkham Knight on PC through Steam, because the game was pulled while they fix it. Because it was a trainwreck. Why would Kojima Productions, Konami, or whoever else want to release a game that follows in those footsteps? Seems like they're not that stupid. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm noticing a pattern. Bad ports have exceedingly high minimum requirements (CoD Ghosts, Arkham Shite, etc.).

It has the same requirements as Ground Zeroes

it was well optimised :P

My PC Specs: CPU: Core i5 4590 @ stock speeds, GPU: RX 480 8GB, RAM: 16GB DDR3 @1600mhz

 

Case: Zalman ZM-T4,Motherboard: GigaByte GA-H81M-S2H LGA 1150, HDD/SSD: 2TB Seagate Expansion drive, 1TB Samsung Portable HDD, 160gb Intel SSD, PSU: 550w corsair cxm

:lol:  :lol:  :lol:  :lol:  :lol:  :lol: 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

IF PEOPLE WANT TO KNOW IF THEY CAN RUN THE GAME WELL

GET GROUND ZEROES (it is awesome) Phantom Pain has same requirements

so you will get an idea of how well your PC will run it :D

My PC Specs: CPU: Core i5 4590 @ stock speeds, GPU: RX 480 8GB, RAM: 16GB DDR3 @1600mhz

 

Case: Zalman ZM-T4,Motherboard: GigaByte GA-H81M-S2H LGA 1150, HDD/SSD: 2TB Seagate Expansion drive, 1TB Samsung Portable HDD, 160gb Intel SSD, PSU: 550w corsair cxm

:lol:  :lol:  :lol:  :lol:  :lol:  :lol: 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

can i run it thoe?

YES YOU CAN :D

 

A gtx 970 is more than enough and a i5 4690K is good too

My PC Specs: CPU: Core i5 4590 @ stock speeds, GPU: RX 480 8GB, RAM: 16GB DDR3 @1600mhz

 

Case: Zalman ZM-T4,Motherboard: GigaByte GA-H81M-S2H LGA 1150, HDD/SSD: 2TB Seagate Expansion drive, 1TB Samsung Portable HDD, 160gb Intel SSD, PSU: 550w corsair cxm

:lol:  :lol:  :lol:  :lol:  :lol:  :lol: 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

I can't purchase Batman: Arkham Knight on PC through Steam, because the game was pulled while they fix it. Because it was a trainwreck. Why would Kojima Productions, Konami, or whoever else want to release a game that follows in those footsteps? Seems like they're not that stupid.

Kojima has nothing to do with MGS anymore. I didn't say that it'll be a bad port, I was just saying that Nvidia offering the game with their cards means that it'll most probably have GameWorks and run bad on AMD cards.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Why is it that we need i7s allnof a sudden?

Are devs getting lazy with optimization or are games evolving?

Thats just BS. i3 to i5 will run this Game easy.

CPU i7 6700k MB  MSI Z170A Pro Carbon GPU Zotac GTX980Ti amp!extreme RAM 16GB DDR4 Corsair Vengeance 3k CASE Corsair 760T PSU Corsair RM750i MOUSE Logitech G9x KB Logitech G910 HS Sennheiser GSP 500 SC Asus Xonar 7.1 MONITOR Acer Predator xb270hu Storage 1x1TB + 2x500GB Samsung 7200U/m - 2x500GB SSD Samsung 850EVO

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Why is it that we need i7s allnof a sudden?

Are devs getting lazy with optimization or are games evolving?

Its just to cover their asses. Any i5 will easily max it out.

Gaming PC: • AMD Ryzen 7 3900x • 16gb Corsair Vengeance RGB Pro 3200mhz • Founders Edition 2080ti • 2x Crucial 1tb nvme ssd • NZXT H1• Logitech G915TKL • Logitech G Pro • Asus ROG XG32VQ • SteelSeries Arctis Pro Wireless

Laptop: MacBook Pro M1 512gb

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Wow recommended is a 4790. xD Good thing I have a 4790K. XP

I'm going to punch your face- IN THE FACE.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

×