"shit" integrated intel gpu vs "op" integrated intel gpu

[Tomaha4k_2k3]

Hi guys, I have just been wondering if the performance between these two builds would differ in modern triple A games, 720p lowest settings. And these two builds wouldn't have any graphics card.

 

Build 1:
CPU: Intel Core i7-8700K, overclocked at its' maximum potential, maybe over 5.0GHz.

RAM: 128GB DDR4 3200MHz

GPU: Intel UDH 630

Motherboard: The Best and Most Expensive Motherboard in the market

PSU: 1200W PSU

Cooling system: Everything is water cooled, except for psu of course, even tho you can.

HDD: 10TB 7200RPM, 1TB each

SSD: 1TB Samsung M.2, and a 500GB Samsung Sata SSD

 

Build 2:
CPU: Intel Core i3-8100, at its' stock speed

RAM: 8GB DDR4 2133MHz

GPU: Intel UHD 630

PSU: 400W EVGA

Coolingl system: Stock everything

HDD: 500GB Western Digital Blue 7200RPM

 

Now, the experiement is about will the two system performs differently, since the first build technically has better in everything, will the amount of ram, ram speed, and cpu clock speed influence the differences?
 

Will it being something like:

GTA V lowest 720P, no advance graphics, absolute lowest possible: First build is 40FPS average, and second build is 30FPS average. Will the result be something like that?

[Tomaha4k_2k3]

I forgot, the second build can have any cheap $50 LGA1151 mobo

[TheRandomness]

The better question is, why are you even considering these builds when it’s possible to make one with a graphics card?

[Guest]

Just get cpu with amd rzyen vega integrated graphics, and get over 2x the performance in aaa games.

Also both build have the same igpu, so you get the same performance.

[Mooshi]

This thread screams trolly. What's the point of tossing in the massive difference between ram and psu besides throwing bigger numbers that has zero impact to the proposed gaming performance?

 

This is at best a status update.

[Tomaha4k_2k3]

On 2/10/2018 at 10:31 PM, TheRandomness said:

The better question is, why are you even considering these builds when it’s possible to make one with a graphics card?

dude im just bored... 

[Anjelllo]

Literally the only difference in perf. Will be from the first machine having faster/more ram for the igpu to use. Stupid post tbh

[Tomaha4k_2k3]

On 2/10/2018 at 10:33 PM, Almostbauws said:

Just get cpu with amd rzyen vega integrated graphics, and get over 2x the performance in aaa games.

uhm... im just askin' u guys, of course having a build with a dedicated gpu will always be a better choice, duh?

[Tomaha4k_2k3]

On 2/10/2018 at 10:37 PM, Anjelllo said:

Literally the only difference in perf. Will be from the first machine having faster/more ram for the igpu to use. Stupid post tbh

if u think it's stupid, then you can choose not to reply, rather than saying negative things

[Guest]

Just now, Tomaha4k_2k3 said:

uhm... im just askin' u guys, of course having a build with a dedicated gpu will always be a better choice, duh?

Then why did you post it in new builds and planning section.

[Tomaha4k_2k3]

On 2/10/2018 at 10:39 PM, Almostbauws said:

Then why did you post it in new builds and planning section.

All I'm askin' is that, will there be any difference in performance between the two pcs? Of course I'm not going to build a pc without a GPU duh?

[Jurrunio]

They should perform the same, because both will see GPU bottleneck in GTA 5

[komar]

@Tomaha4k_2k3 very easy to compare. Get yoiur phone, download GPU-L and CPU-L from Google Play - they are free.

In about 2 minutes you will know that the intel uhd graphics 630, used in the i7 8700 have 24 execution uits, running at 1200 MHz and the i3 8100 that also has uhd graphics 630 with 23 execution units, running 1100 MHz. From those numbers you can plainly see the performance won't be much better on the i7 but there will be some improvement. Then ofc more RAM and faster RAM will give you more performance because the iGPU runs off that.

 

Just the simple fact that you didn't look up that the both chip use the same graphics makes this thread a bit ......

 

If you compared Kaby Lake CPUs where you have HD 610 and HD 630 would be better since the 630 has double the performance (24 vs 12 units) of the 610