Jump to content

Is my 1080 TI Defective?

Shadymer85
Go to solution Solved by Shadymer85,

Ok so it looks like the culprit in BF4 was Resolution Scaling being set to 200%. I didn't set it to that value, but that is where it was. I put it down to 120% and I am now getting 130 + FPS average on Ultra. I'm guessing the scaling is more taxing on the card than say actually rendering 1440p on a monitor that supports it. I'm hoping that is the case since I want to upgrade to a 1440p monitor. Anyways, thank you guys so much for chiming in to help. Much appreciated.

Hey everybody,

 

I just recently built a machine with an EVGA 1080 TI Hybrid card and I'm not getting the same numbers I'm seeing others get online during game benchmarks. For instance, in Battlefield 4, I am getting only 80-100 FPS on ULTRA with dips as low as 54 FPS @1080p all the while I'm seeing guys running an average of 150 +FPS online with the same settings. Destiny 2 is also showing about 30 FPS less than what I'm seeing others get. I realize these numbers aren't atrocious, but I want to make sure I got what I payed for. I have the latest Nvidia drivers and Win 10 Pro is up to date. Any advice on what I might be missing would be greatly appreciated.

 

 

My setup:

 

Processor: 7700k

Motherboard: Asus Prime Z270 A

RAM: 16 GB G Skill Ripjaws V Series

Video Card: EVGA 1080 TI Hybrid 

OS: Win 10 Pro

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Did you DDU and is that processor overclocked

Want to custom loop?  Ask me more if you are curious

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes I used DDU and re-installed the newest driver. I have not touched the clock speeds on the card.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

29 minutes ago, Shadymer85 said:

Yes I used DDU and re-installed the newest driver. I have not touched the clock speeds on the card.

CPU clocks, at 1080p especially the CPU becomes the bottleneck. The higher the resolution you move up the more the burden gets put on the GPU

Fanboys are the worst thing to happen to the tech community World. Chief among them are Apple fanboys. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

I've read that before. The part that confuses me is that

1. The cpu is pretty decent 

2. The cpu is not even close to being fully utilized. I figured if the cpu were taking over it would at least be at 100% if that were the case

 

 

Also if that were the case, how am I seeing other guys with 1080p performance much higher than mine with similar and sometimes even lesser specs?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

The best thing you can do is check utilization numbers on both the processor and the graphics card. That being percentage of utilization, clock speeds, memory usage, core usage and watching for any spikes in utilization. It's these numbers that will tell you wether your card is performing normally.

 

It could very well be that your graphics card is simply underutilized because it's being bottlenecked by the 7700 k.

 

Use some programs like afterburner and Intel XTU and hardware monitor while you're using the programs are having issues with then get back to us with some numbers.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Maxxtraxx said:

The best thing you can do is check utilization numbers on both the processor and the graphics card. That being percentage of utilization, clock speeds, memory usage, core usage and watching for any spikes in utilization. It's these numbers that will tell you wether your card is performing normally.

 

It could very well be that your graphics card is simply underutilized because it's being bottlenecked by the 7700 k.

 

Use some programs like afterburner and Intel XTU and hardware monitor while you're using the programs are having issues with then get back to us with some numbers.

Ok will do. Thank you guys.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Have you ran a bench mark to ensure the card is being fully utilized? Any other games give you an issue?

 

Just hopped on real quick on my 1440p rig, single 1080 on ultra gets mid to 140-170 average.

Main RIg Corsair Air 540, I7 9900k, ASUS ROG Maximus XI Hero, G.Skill Ripjaws 3600 32GB, 3090FE, EVGA 1000G5, Acer Nitro XZ3 2560 x 1440@240hz 

 

Spare RIg Lian Li O11 AIR MINI, I7 4790K, Asus Maximus VI Extreme, G.Skill Ares 2400 32Gb, EVGA 1080ti, 1080sc 1070sc & 1060 SSC, EVGA 850GA, Acer KG251Q 1920x1080@240hz

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Mick Naughty said:

Have you ran a bench mark to ensure the card is being fully utilized? Any other games give you an issue?

 

Just hopped on real quick on my 1440p rig, single 1080 on ultra gets mid to 140-170 average.

See that's what I don't understand. I ran MSI Afterburner while playing BF4 on Ultra and am averaging 70-100 FPS.The GPU is being fully utilized according to Afterburner and the CPU is sometimes around 50% utilization but not often. Temps are more than acceptable with GPU and CPU temps not exceeding high 40's and low 50's C. The idea that the 1080p resolution is not high enough doesn't seem to hold water here since the GPU is being fully utilized right?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

21 minutes ago, Shadymer85 said:

See that's what I don't understand. I ran MSI Afterburner while playing BF4 on Ultra and am averaging 70-100 FPS.The GPU is being fully utilized according to Afterburner and the CPU is sometimes around 50% utilization but not often. Temps are more than acceptable with GPU and CPU temps not exceeding high 40's and low 50's C. The idea that the 1080p resolution is not high enough doesn't seem to hold water here since the GPU is being fully utilized right?

Well if its just on ultra settings and nothing else was swapped, turn scaling up to 120 I think it is, should be able to do what ever with that card on that game though. Only way to push the card harder. I couldn't use my 1080 on 1080 with bf1, couldn't get it to try so with the usage fluctuation it would make the same frames as one of my titans. If that doesn't help go back on gpu driver. 

Main RIg Corsair Air 540, I7 9900k, ASUS ROG Maximus XI Hero, G.Skill Ripjaws 3600 32GB, 3090FE, EVGA 1000G5, Acer Nitro XZ3 2560 x 1440@240hz 

 

Spare RIg Lian Li O11 AIR MINI, I7 4790K, Asus Maximus VI Extreme, G.Skill Ares 2400 32Gb, EVGA 1080ti, 1080sc 1070sc & 1060 SSC, EVGA 850GA, Acer KG251Q 1920x1080@240hz

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

it sounds like something's bottlenecking it rather than defective

5950x 1.33v 5.05 4.5 88C 195w ll R20 12k ll drp4 ll x570 dark hero ll gskill 4x8gb 3666 14-14-14-32-320-24-2T (zen trfc)  1.45v 45C 1.15v soc ll 6950xt gaming x trio 325w 60C ll samsung 970 500gb nvme os ll sandisk 4tb ssd ll 6x nf12/14 ippc fans ll tt gt10 case ll evga g2 1300w ll w10 pro ll 34GN850B ll AW3423DW

 

9900k 1.36v 5.1avx 4.9ring 85C 195w (daily) 1.02v 4.3ghz 80w 50C R20 temps score=5500 ll D15 ll Z390 taichi ult 1.60 bios ll gskill 4x8gb 14-14-14-30-280-20 ddr3666bdie 1.45v 45C 1.22sa/1.18 io  ll EVGA 30 non90 tie ftw3 1920//10000 0.85v 300w 71C ll  6x nf14 ippc 2000rpm ll 500gb nvme 970 evo ll l sandisk 4tb sata ssd +4tb exssd backup ll 2x 500gb samsung 970 evo raid 0 llCorsair graphite 780T ll EVGA P2 1200w ll w10p ll NEC PA241w ll pa32ucg-k

 

prebuilt 5800 stock ll 2x8gb ddr4 cl17 3466 ll oem 3080 0.85v 1890//10000 290w 74C ll 27gl850b ll pa272w ll w11

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Shadymer85 said:

-snip- and the CPU is sometimes around 50% utilization but not often. -snip-

Check per-core utilization.  You might see 100% on a few cores.  Reports vary on Battlefield's ability to use all the cores, such as this thread on another forum.

Main Rig:

Case: Lian Li Lancool Mesh RGB

CPU: Ryzen 5 3600 

Cooler: CoolerMaster MasterLiquid 240

MB: MSI B550 Gaming Pro Carbon 

Ram: Gskill DDR4 3600 x 32GB 

GPU: Asus Arez Strix Vega 64 OC

PS: Seasonic FOCUS Gold Plus Series SSR-750FX

SSD1: Crucial P1 1TB NVME

SSD2: Adata SU800 512gb M.2 Sata

HDD: Hitatchi 2tb 7200RPM + 3x 2TB WD Passport USB 3.0

Monitors: AOC C24G1

Keyboard: Cheap Blue Knockoff Mechanical

Mouse: Uhuru Gaming Mouse
OS: Pop! 21.04



Current Vintage Equipment:  Please ask me about it, I love to talk old tech!
IBM Thinkpad 390, IBM Aptiva A12, IBM PS/2 Model 25-004.  Compaq Contura 4/25C, Presario 7596
Asus P5A-B Socket 7 Box, Tandy 1000RLX-HD "B" & 1200-2FD, VIC20, Zenith ZFL-181-93, Packard Bell 300SX.

Apple II/gs, Mac Plus x2, Mac SE x2, Performa 450

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok so it looks like the culprit in BF4 was Resolution Scaling being set to 200%. I didn't set it to that value, but that is where it was. I put it down to 120% and I am now getting 130 + FPS average on Ultra. I'm guessing the scaling is more taxing on the card than say actually rendering 1440p on a monitor that supports it. I'm hoping that is the case since I want to upgrade to a 1440p monitor. Anyways, thank you guys so much for chiming in to help. Much appreciated.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

×