Jump to content

Which is better I3 8350k vs r5 1600

Go to solution Solved by Guest,

At stock speeds, the R5 1600 beats the 8350k, overclock the R5 1600 gets you a good performance boost, when the 8350k is overclocked to say 4.8GHz for example, it nearly has identical performance to an i5-8400 at stock speeds. Honestly, overclocking the 8350k to insanly high overclocks like 4.8-5.0GHz to gain a little bit of performance isnt worth it considering that you have to factor in the cost of sufficient cooling to keep the CPU at stabe temps when overclocking and the performance bump isnt too much to say a "little bit of an increase" in performance. From benchmarks, the 8350k when overclocked to 4.8GHz delivers about a 10fps advantage to a R5 1600 OCed to 4.0GHz, the fps increase can be a little bit more in some other games. The 10fps advantage in games might be noticable, or wont be at all, if the R5 1600 is the same price as the 8350k, then get it, delivers solid gaming performance and also does well in productivity workloads as well. +Zen 2 is supported on the AM4 platform and will provide better performance when its released. B350 motherboards are also cheaper, you get the included wraith cooler (might get around a 3.7GHz overclock; 3.8GHz stable, can also get an aftermarket cooler for $30 (suggestions: CRYORIG H7/hyper 212 evo) ) and some good DDR4 memory.

Right now thr i3 8350k is around the same price as an r5 1600 and i want to know which one is better for gaming at 1080p with a 1060 6gb and 16gb of ram.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

go with the R5 1600 for "future proofing"

 

the i3 8350K is a bad buy when you pay a bit more for the i5 8400

 

some game like the Assassins Creed origins may struggle with the quad core

 

 

Budget? Uses? Currency? Location? Operating System? Peripherals? Monitor? Use PCPartPicker wherever possible. 

Quote whom you're replying to, and set option to follow your topics. Or Else we can't see your reply.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Only gaming? I rather take the i5 8400, 7700k like performance in games

Desktop specs:

Spoiler

AMD Ryzen 5 5600 Thermalright Peerless Assassin 120 SE ARGB Gigabyte B550M DS3H mATX

Asrock Challenger Pro OC Radeon RX 6700 XT Corsair Vengeance LPX 16GB (8Gx2) 3600MHz CL18 Kingston NV2 1TB PCIe 4.0 NVMe SSD

Montech Century 850W Gold Tecware Nexus Air (Black) ATX Mid Tower

Laptop: Lenovo Ideapad 5 Pro 16ACH6

Phone: Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro 8+128

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

the 1600 would be better than the 8350k, but for the same price you can get an i5 8400 which will perform better than the 1600 so either the 8400 if you can afford the z370 board of the 1600 if you can't.

CPU: AMD Ryzen 5 5600X Heatsink: Gelid Phantom Black GPU: Palit RTX 3060 Ti Dual RAM: Corsair DDR4 2x8GB 3000Mhz mobo: Asus X570-P case: Fractal Design Define C PSU: Superflower Leadex Gold 650W

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

I went from Ryzen 1700 to 8600k because I was lacking single core performance for MMORPG games.

I don't regreat a thing yet since Black Desert Online is giving me 50-60 fps now comapred to 25-40 before (in towns).

 

But in that case I'm not sure which one to get. i3 8350k is slower than Ryzen 1600 in multicore speed. And not marginally slowwer so it's a hard choise xD

Intel i7 12700K | Gigabyte Z690 Gaming X DDR4 | Pure Loop 240mm | G.Skill 3200MHz 32GB CL14 | CM V850 G2 | RTX 3070 Phoenix | Lian Li O11 Air mini

Samsung EVO 960 M.2 250GB | Samsung EVO 860 PRO 512GB | 4x Be Quiet! Silent Wings 140mm fans

WD My Cloud 4TB

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, herman mcpootis said:

the 1600 would be better than the 8350k, but for the same price you can get an i5 8400 which will perform better than the 1600 so either the 8400 if you can afford the z370 board of the 1600 if you can't.

On amazon.co.uk the price of the 8400 is £100 more than the r5 1600

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

1600 if you need it now as the boards are cheaper and the availability is better (also includes a very good stock cooler) 
8350 if you want that extra edge in per core performance , has less cores/threads tho and needs rather expensive X370 boards as those are the only available 

RyzenAir : AMD R5 3600 | AsRock AB350M Pro4 | 32gb Aegis DDR4 3000 | GTX 1070 FE | Fractal Design Node 804
RyzenITX : Ryzen 7 1700 | GA-AB350N-Gaming WIFI | 16gb DDR4 2666 | GTX 1060 | Cougar QBX 

 

PSU Tier list

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, GrandMushroom5 said:

On amazon.co.uk the price of the 8400 is £100 more than the r5 1600

Then r5 1600

Desktop specs:

Spoiler

AMD Ryzen 5 5600 Thermalright Peerless Assassin 120 SE ARGB Gigabyte B550M DS3H mATX

Asrock Challenger Pro OC Radeon RX 6700 XT Corsair Vengeance LPX 16GB (8Gx2) 3600MHz CL18 Kingston NV2 1TB PCIe 4.0 NVMe SSD

Montech Century 850W Gold Tecware Nexus Air (Black) ATX Mid Tower

Laptop: Lenovo Ideapad 5 Pro 16ACH6

Phone: Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro 8+128

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

No. The 8350K outperforms the Ryzen when gaming in every way.

 

Try an 8th gen i5 6 core if you want to future proof, as games will start using 6 cores etc.

Probably gaming or helping technophobes with tech...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

30 minutes ago, userzero said:

The coffee lake i3 all day long.

 

Let me google that for you anyway http://cpu.userbenchmark.com/Compare/Intel-Core-i3-8350K-vs-AMD-Ryzen-5-1600/3935vs3919

No way.

The i3 is only 4core 4 thread. So its basically a i5-7600k.

 

Stock speeds sure. Old games sure. But new games? Overclocked? the 1600 kills it.

 

The ryzen motherboard is also cheaper and comes with a much better CPU cooler, giving you more room to get some nice DDR4.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

No. Single thread speed is what counts in gaming. And this is for gaming.

Probably gaming or helping technophobes with tech...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

At stock speeds, the R5 1600 beats the 8350k, overclock the R5 1600 gets you a good performance boost, when the 8350k is overclocked to say 4.8GHz for example, it nearly has identical performance to an i5-8400 at stock speeds. Honestly, overclocking the 8350k to insanly high overclocks like 4.8-5.0GHz to gain a little bit of performance isnt worth it considering that you have to factor in the cost of sufficient cooling to keep the CPU at stabe temps when overclocking and the performance bump isnt too much to say a "little bit of an increase" in performance. From benchmarks, the 8350k when overclocked to 4.8GHz delivers about a 10fps advantage to a R5 1600 OCed to 4.0GHz, the fps increase can be a little bit more in some other games. The 10fps advantage in games might be noticable, or wont be at all, if the R5 1600 is the same price as the 8350k, then get it, delivers solid gaming performance and also does well in productivity workloads as well. +Zen 2 is supported on the AM4 platform and will provide better performance when its released. B350 motherboards are also cheaper, you get the included wraith cooler (might get around a 3.7GHz overclock; 3.8GHz stable, can also get an aftermarket cooler for $30 (suggestions: CRYORIG H7/hyper 212 evo) ) and some good DDR4 memory.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, userzero said:

No. Single thread speed is what counts in gaming. And this is for gaming.

4c/4thread chips choke in modern games especially at higher refresh rates. Overclocked ryzen with nice memory clock speeds gives a much smoother a consistent gaming experience across all titles. You would have to be stupid to buy the i3. imo.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

23 minutes ago, userzero said:

The coffee lake i3 all day long.

 

Let me google that for you anyway http://cpu.userbenchmark.com/Compare/Intel-Core-i3-8350K-vs-AMD-Ryzen-5-1600/3935vs3919

Careful, LMGTFY posts are against the Community Standards. 

 

I’d try to get an i5 8400. If you cant, the 1600 will do you fine. 

Main System: Phobos

AMD Ryzen 7 2700 (8C/16T), ASRock B450 Steel Legend, 16GB G.SKILL Aegis DDR4 3000MHz, AMD Radeon RX 570 4GB (XFX), 960GB Crucial M500, 2TB Seagate BarraCuda, Windows 10 Pro for Workstations/macOS Catalina

 

Secondary System: York

Intel Core i7-2600 (4C/8T), ASUS P8Z68-V/GEN3, 16GB GEIL Enhance Corsa DDR3 1600MHz, Zotac GeForce GTX 550 Ti 1GB, 240GB ADATA Ultimate SU650, Windows 10 Pro for Workstations

 

Older File Server: Yet to be named

Intel Pentium 4 HT (1C/2T), Intel D865GBF, 3GB DDR 400MHz, ATI Radeon HD 4650 1GB (HIS), 80GB WD Caviar, 320GB Hitachi Deskstar, Windows XP Pro SP3, Windows Server 2003 R2

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

×