Jump to content

Are AMD GPU drivers still bad?

Go to solution Solved by ImWilly,
8 hours ago, Millios said:

extra 4gbs of VRAM make up for it?

Well, for extra VRAM, that is actually quite a niche requirement

Bigger VRAM surely helps for loading higher quality graphic setting, but it doesn't matter if the compute cores are not enough to process it to high FPS counts

That's why NVIDIA insists on "barely enough" VRAM, especially on the entry line up such as RTX 4060, cause the compute unit is so minimum, that it wouldn't need excessive 16GB of VRAM compared to RX 7600 XT

With that said, it doesn't mean that VRAM is not important, it's just NVIDIA is intentionally cut some corners on the lower line up to make the RTX 4090 24GB VRAM very desirable (for upselling purpose)

8 hours ago, Millios said:

Cause you did mention that amd is more bank for the buck.

Yup, that's AMD strategy since the beginning. Knowing that they can't beat NVIDIA in AI related features, AMD undercut the price of their GPU compared to NVIDIA, and focus on the segments that they are really good at, which is gaming.

I have been using my RX 7900 XT for a year now, it is really great experience for gaming. My disclosed frustrations for me to use, is FPS counter overlay that doesn't work on last year's driver, and experience playing "Fallout: New Vegas" (after watching the TV shows, I really have an urge to play that)

Somehow, I can't load the game with 2024 version of the driver, and I have to reroll to 2023 version of the driver in order to play it. To be fair, it's probably the developer's problem not optimizing the game years ago and abandon it.

For productivity side, AMD Radeon shouldn't have any big issue, the only difference to NVIDIA is that the CUDA cores is so well-optimized by the video editing app developer, it will have shorter rendering time.

 

So if I have to choose between RX 7800 XT and RTX 4070 (assuming it's the same price), I will take RTX. 12GB vs 16GB is not a game changer, 6GB to 8GB is a huge improvement since 6GB is barely minimum nowadays. And RTX is practically versatile for gaming and productivity, so it fits on your use case

For a build I'll make after this summer is done I'm looking for a GPU that can run games at 1440p and 90+fps at least and have good performance for 1080p and 4k editing in programs like davinci resolve,adobe after effects and Photoshop.

Due to pricings in my country and lack of good used parts I'm stuck betweens an rx 7800xt and an rtx 4070 (potentially a super if prices drop low enough). I'm aware of the new gen coming however I'll stick to this gen. It'll have 32gbs of ram (5200 Mt/s, ddr5) and a ryzen 5 7600. Are the AMD drivers good now? Or should I stick to team green? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Millios said:

Are the AMD drivers good now?

Sure, AMD drivers improved a lot, so it wouldn't do some random BSOD out of the blue

I feel it's way better compared to the drivers last year where sometimes the FPS overlay wouldn't even show, and Frame Gen is a really good additional feature on 2024 version of the driver

 

5 minutes ago, Millios said:

Or should I stick to team green?

It depends, productivity does favours NVIDIA

If the pricing in your country places Radeon RX 7800 XT and RTX 4070 (Super if there's some price drop as you have mentioned), I would go for RTX all the way, cause the main advantage of Radeon cards are performance per price which makes it more appealing compared to NVIDIA

 

My System: Ryzen 7800X3D // Gigabyte B650 AORUS ELITE AX // 32GB 6000MHz DDR5 Silicon Power Zenith CL30 // Sapphire Pulse AMD Radeon RX 7900 XT OC with mod heatsink on the metal plate  // Phanteks P300A  // Gigabyte Aorus GEN4 7300 PCIE 4.0 NVME // Kingston NV2 Gen4 PCIE 4.0 NVME // 

Seasonic Focus GX-850 Fully Modular // Thermalright Frost Spirit 140 Black V3 // Phanteks M25 140mm // Display: Bezel 32MD845 V2 QHD // Keychron K8 Pro (Mod: Gateron black box ink; Tape mode on PCB and Keycaps) // Razer Cobra Wired Mouse // Audio Technica M50X Headphone // Sennheiser HD 650 // Genius SP-HF180 USB Speaker //

 

And Laptop Acer Nitro 5 AN515-45 for mobility

Phone:

iPhone 11 (with battery replaced instead of buying new phone for long term and not submitting (fully) to Apple Lord

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes they are.

mY sYsTeM iS Not pErfoRmInG aS gOOd As I sAW oN yOuTuBe. WhA t IS a GoOd FaN CuRVe??!!? wHat aRe tEh GoOd OvERclok SeTTinGS FoR My CaRd??  HoW CaN I foRcE my GpU to uSe 1o0%? BuT WiLL i HaVE Bo0tllEnEcKs? RyZEN dOeS NoT peRfORm BetTer wItH HiGhER sPEED RaM!!dId i WiN teH SiLiCON LotTerrYyOu ShoUlD dEsHrOuD uR GPUmy SYstEm iS UNDerPerforMiNg iN WarzONEcan mY Pc Run WiNdOwS 11 ?woUld BaKInG MY GRaPHics card fIX it? MultimETeR TeSTiNG!! aMd'S GpU DrIvErS aRe as goOD aS NviDia's YOU SHoUlD oVERCloCk yOUR ramS To 5000C18

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, ImWilly said:

Sure, AMD drivers improved a lot, so it wouldn't do some random BSOD out of the blue

I feel it's way better compared to the drivers last year where sometimes the FPS overlay wouldn't even show, and Frame Gen is a really good additional feature on 2024 version of the driver

 

It depends, productivity does favours NVIDIA

If the pricing in your country places Radeon RX 7800 XT and RTX 4070 (Super if there's some price drop as you have mentioned), I would go for RTX all the way, cause the main advantage of Radeon cards are performance per price which makes it more appealing compared to NVIDIA

 

I see. I do understand the cuda cores on the Nvidia and codecs as well are somewhat better but do the newer drivers and the extra 4gbs of VRAM make up for it? Cause you did mention that amd is more bank for the buck.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just now, Levent said:

Yes they are.

depends how lucky,

 

usually they are bad for brand new games

Note: Users receive notifications after Mentions & Quotes. 

Feel free to ask any questions regarding my comments/build lists. I know a lot about PCs but not everything.

PC:

Ryzen 5 5600 |16GB DDR4 3200Mhz | B450 | GTX 1080 ti

PCs I used before:

Pentium G4500 | 4GB/8GB DDR4 2133Mhz | H110 | GTX 1050

Ryzen 3 1200 3,5Ghz / OC:4Ghz | 8GB DDR4 2133Mhz / 16GB 3200Mhz | B450 | GTX 1050

Ryzen 3 1200 3,5Ghz | 16GB 3200Mhz | B450 | GTX 1080 ti

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Levent said:

Yes they are.

Are we talking system crashing bad still? Or some fps drops and low 1% more times than they should bad?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just now, Millios said:

I see. I do understand the cuda cores on the Nvidia and codecs as well are somewhat better but do the newer drivers and the extra 4gbs of VRAM make up for it? Cause you did mention that amd is more bank for the buck.

amd is better bang, and cuda is only useful if you use software that capitalizes on it, otherwise you don't really need it for gaming

Note: Users receive notifications after Mentions & Quotes. 

Feel free to ask any questions regarding my comments/build lists. I know a lot about PCs but not everything.

PC:

Ryzen 5 5600 |16GB DDR4 3200Mhz | B450 | GTX 1080 ti

PCs I used before:

Pentium G4500 | 4GB/8GB DDR4 2133Mhz | H110 | GTX 1050

Ryzen 3 1200 3,5Ghz / OC:4Ghz | 8GB DDR4 2133Mhz / 16GB 3200Mhz | B450 | GTX 1050

Ryzen 3 1200 3,5Ghz | 16GB 3200Mhz | B450 | GTX 1080 ti

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

They're fine. Just buy whatever GPU suits your needs and budget.

Primary Gaming Rig:

Ryzen 5 5600 CPU, Gigabyte B450 I AORUS PRO WIFI mITX motherboard, PNY XLR8 16GB (2x8GB) DDR4-3200 CL16 RAM, Mushkin PILOT 500GB SSD (boot), Corsair Force 3 480GB SSD (games), XFX RX 5700 8GB GPU, Fractal Design Node 202 HTPC Case, Corsair SF 450 W 80+ Gold SFX PSU, Windows 11 Pro, Dell S2719DGF 27.0" 2560x1440 155 Hz Monitor, Corsair K68 RGB Wired Gaming Keyboard (MX Brown), Logitech G900 CHAOS SPECTRUM Wireless Mouse, Logitech G533 Headset

 

HTPC/Gaming Rig:

Ryzen 7 3700X CPU, ASRock B450M Pro4 mATX Motherboard, ADATA XPG GAMMIX D20 16GB (2x8GB) DDR4-3200 CL16 RAM, Mushkin PILOT 1TB SSD (boot), 2x Seagate BarraCuda 1 TB 3.5" HDD (data), Seagate BarraCuda 4 TB 3.5" HDD (DVR), PowerColor RX VEGA 56 8GB GPU, Fractal Design Node 804 mATX Case, Cooler Master MasterWatt 550 W 80+ Bronze Semi-modular ATX PSU, Silverstone SST-SOB02 Blu-Ray Writer, Windows 11 Pro, Logitech K400 Plus Keyboard, Corsair K63 Lapboard Combo (MX Red w/Blue LED), Logitech G603 Wireless Mouse, Kingston HyperX Cloud Stinger Headset, HAUPPAUGE WinTV-quadHD TV Tuner, Samsung 65RU9000 TV

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Millios said:

Are we talking system crashing bad still? Or some fps drops and low 1% more times than they should bad?

second one

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, podkall said:

amd is better bang, and cuda is only useful if you use software that capitalizes on it, otherwise you don't really need it for gaming

To my understanding editing programs capitalize on cuda cores don't they? From what I've seen they use them to render images, do complex tasks and render videos. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just now, BentleyOwen123 said:

second one

If it's the second I can deal with it since it affects gaming more than editing. Cause I do not want to lose hours of work again.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Millios said:

Are we talking system crashing bad still? Or some fps drops and low 1% more times than they should bad?

1%s are always AMDs trouble spot. I was talking in the lines of actual driver/software stability.

mY sYsTeM iS Not pErfoRmInG aS gOOd As I sAW oN yOuTuBe. WhA t IS a GoOd FaN CuRVe??!!? wHat aRe tEh GoOd OvERclok SeTTinGS FoR My CaRd??  HoW CaN I foRcE my GpU to uSe 1o0%? BuT WiLL i HaVE Bo0tllEnEcKs? RyZEN dOeS NoT peRfORm BetTer wItH HiGhER sPEED RaM!!dId i WiN teH SiLiCON LotTerrYyOu ShoUlD dEsHrOuD uR GPUmy SYstEm iS UNDerPerforMiNg iN WarzONEcan mY Pc Run WiNdOwS 11 ?woUld BaKInG MY GRaPHics card fIX it? MultimETeR TeSTiNG!! aMd'S GpU DrIvErS aRe as goOD aS NviDia's YOU SHoUlD oVERCloCk yOUR ramS To 5000C18

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Levent said:

1%s are always AMDs trouble spot. I was talking in the lines of actual driver/software stability.

When you mean stability where exactly does it stand then? Does it crash often? Does it stutter? If it crashes it's a great scare for what I want it for. If it stutters I can deal with it. If it's some errors that get resolved without closing the program again it's acceptable but if it closes it it's a problem 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

I swapped from RTX 4070 to RX 7800 XT lately. I do notice some small stutters there where there earlier weren't (I assume when assets are first loaded). But the average fps without ray tracing is better.

Seems to be driver issue rather than anything else. But I haven't used AMD GPU for a while (before this one)...

I edit my posts more often than not

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Tan3l6 said:

I swapped from RTX 4070 to RX 7800 XT lately. I do notice some small stutters there where there earlier weren't. But the average fps without ray tracing is better.

Seems to be driver issue rather than anything else. But I haven't used AMD GPU for a while (before this one)...

How about using some programs that aren't for gaming necessarily? Do they crash or pop up with errors a lot? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Millios said:

How about using some programs that aren't for gaming necessarily? Do they crash or pop up with errors a lot? 

No, no errors at all with either cards. But I'm not using any other non-gaming apps than 3D-benchmarks.

One aspect - 4070 was easier to OC so it is almost as fast as 7800 XT at default speeds. Only issues appear when I try to OC the AMD card. Nvidia drivers reset automatically when OC was unstable. AMD might need pressing manually keyboard shortcut to reset.

I edit my posts more often than not

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

30 minutes ago, Millios said:

To my understanding editing programs capitalize on cuda cores don't they? From what I've seen they use them to render images, do complex tasks and render videos. 

depends what programs, some barely use GPU some might use CUDA,

 

Blender would be a better example

 

7 minutes ago, Tan3l6 said:

I swapped from RTX 4070 to RX 7800 XT lately. I do notice some small stutters there where there earlier weren't (I assume when assets are first loaded). But the average fps without ray tracing is better.

Seems to be driver issue rather than anything else. But I haven't used AMD GPU for a while (before this one)...

is it on all kinds of games or is this more likely the more "fresh" the game is?

Note: Users receive notifications after Mentions & Quotes. 

Feel free to ask any questions regarding my comments/build lists. I know a lot about PCs but not everything.

PC:

Ryzen 5 5600 |16GB DDR4 3200Mhz | B450 | GTX 1080 ti

PCs I used before:

Pentium G4500 | 4GB/8GB DDR4 2133Mhz | H110 | GTX 1050

Ryzen 3 1200 3,5Ghz / OC:4Ghz | 8GB DDR4 2133Mhz / 16GB 3200Mhz | B450 | GTX 1050

Ryzen 3 1200 3,5Ghz | 16GB 3200Mhz | B450 | GTX 1080 ti

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Tan3l6 said:

No, no errors at all with either cards. But I'm not using any other non-gaming apps than 3D-benchmarks.

One aspect - 4070 was easier to OC so it is almost as fast as 7800 XT at default speeds.

I do not intend to oc any component (maybe tweak the CPU and RAM but not push it to it's absolute limits) so the Rx is faster out of the box then. If it doesn't crash and it's only some stutters I suppose then an and GPU is more worth it since it's also cheaper 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Millios said:

I do not intend to oc any component (maybe tweak the CPU and RAM but not push it to it's absolute limits) so the Rx is faster out of the box then. If it doesn't crash and it's only some stutters I suppose then an and GPU is more worth it since it's also cheaper 

The differences in performance are mild. Mostly a matter of preference in features.

 

  

3 minutes ago, podkall said:

is it on all kinds of games or is this more likely the more "fresh" the game is?

I only remember one of the newest games when the menu loads. Have not played a lot other games lately.

Lightyear Frontier starting screen stutters each time game loads, and when the game starts it stutters lightly also, but smooth after loading.

I edit my posts more often than not

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Tan3l6 said:

The differences in performance are mild. Mostly a matter of preference in features.

 

  

I only remember one of the newest games when the menu loads.

Have not played a lot other games lately.

One I've seen relatively recently is Fortnite and some shooters like apex where the 1% drop to like 9fps and the .1% to 1-2. Has that happened to you? (In situations like gunfights not out and about with no one around)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just now, Millios said:

One I've seen relatively recently is Fortnite and some shooters like apex where the 1% drop to like 9fps and the .1% to 1-2. Has that happened to you? (In situations like gunfights not out and about with no one around)

Have played neither of those lately, can't say.

I edit my posts more often than not

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, Tan3l6 said:

I only remember one of the newest games when the menu loads. Have not played a lot other games lately.

Lightyear Frontier starting screen stutters each time game loads, and when the game starts it stutters lightly also, but smooth after loading.

that could just be new games and not even GPU's fault u know,

 

I heared that sometimes AMD card owners are more vocal about their games stuttering than Nvidia owners, despite Nvidia owners experiencing same lag with new games

 

 

Note: Users receive notifications after Mentions & Quotes. 

Feel free to ask any questions regarding my comments/build lists. I know a lot about PCs but not everything.

PC:

Ryzen 5 5600 |16GB DDR4 3200Mhz | B450 | GTX 1080 ti

PCs I used before:

Pentium G4500 | 4GB/8GB DDR4 2133Mhz | H110 | GTX 1050

Ryzen 3 1200 3,5Ghz / OC:4Ghz | 8GB DDR4 2133Mhz / 16GB 3200Mhz | B450 | GTX 1050

Ryzen 3 1200 3,5Ghz | 16GB 3200Mhz | B450 | GTX 1080 ti

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

My AMD Gpu will record gameplay using AMD Relive ONLY at 30FPS in H264 mode, if I choose H265 it'll do 60fps everytime, but set back to H264 it WILL NOT capture 60FPS even though the option is enabled...(H264 faster/less demand to edit than H265) and half rate vsync cannot be located in the drivers which is bad for lower end GPU's (VRR solves this typically however until you hit 48Hz in high detail low fps games or CPU limited games) but you can't SET 1/2 Rate Vsync yourself...but its crazy that 2006--2024 no Half Rate Vsync has been in their drivers and FPS caps don't count as it's not the same output/effect I want for smoothness (Synced with proper framepacing, not just a cap)

 

I don't know for sure if the Relive bug is just me or not... but worth putting it out there because it's still an issue today for me.

Beyond those two gripes with the drivers, the AMD setup don't give me much annoyance at all, and the GUI is nice even though I rarely use it that much..
 

Maximums - Asus Z97-K /w i5 4690 Bclk @106.9Mhz * x39 = 4.17Ghz, 8GB of 2600Mhz DDR3,.. Gigabyte GTX970 G1-Gaming @ 1550Mhz

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

If drivers is a long term issue, reviewers would have said so in their videos... and basically none of them do

 

And if the price of the 4070 Super drops, the price of the 7900 GRE might drop as well...

 

Its just the performance and hardware acceleration for productivity apps that you have to decide on.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, Millios said:

extra 4gbs of VRAM make up for it?

Well, for extra VRAM, that is actually quite a niche requirement

Bigger VRAM surely helps for loading higher quality graphic setting, but it doesn't matter if the compute cores are not enough to process it to high FPS counts

That's why NVIDIA insists on "barely enough" VRAM, especially on the entry line up such as RTX 4060, cause the compute unit is so minimum, that it wouldn't need excessive 16GB of VRAM compared to RX 7600 XT

With that said, it doesn't mean that VRAM is not important, it's just NVIDIA is intentionally cut some corners on the lower line up to make the RTX 4090 24GB VRAM very desirable (for upselling purpose)

8 hours ago, Millios said:

Cause you did mention that amd is more bank for the buck.

Yup, that's AMD strategy since the beginning. Knowing that they can't beat NVIDIA in AI related features, AMD undercut the price of their GPU compared to NVIDIA, and focus on the segments that they are really good at, which is gaming.

I have been using my RX 7900 XT for a year now, it is really great experience for gaming. My disclosed frustrations for me to use, is FPS counter overlay that doesn't work on last year's driver, and experience playing "Fallout: New Vegas" (after watching the TV shows, I really have an urge to play that)

Somehow, I can't load the game with 2024 version of the driver, and I have to reroll to 2023 version of the driver in order to play it. To be fair, it's probably the developer's problem not optimizing the game years ago and abandon it.

For productivity side, AMD Radeon shouldn't have any big issue, the only difference to NVIDIA is that the CUDA cores is so well-optimized by the video editing app developer, it will have shorter rendering time.

 

So if I have to choose between RX 7800 XT and RTX 4070 (assuming it's the same price), I will take RTX. 12GB vs 16GB is not a game changer, 6GB to 8GB is a huge improvement since 6GB is barely minimum nowadays. And RTX is practically versatile for gaming and productivity, so it fits on your use case

My System: Ryzen 7800X3D // Gigabyte B650 AORUS ELITE AX // 32GB 6000MHz DDR5 Silicon Power Zenith CL30 // Sapphire Pulse AMD Radeon RX 7900 XT OC with mod heatsink on the metal plate  // Phanteks P300A  // Gigabyte Aorus GEN4 7300 PCIE 4.0 NVME // Kingston NV2 Gen4 PCIE 4.0 NVME // 

Seasonic Focus GX-850 Fully Modular // Thermalright Frost Spirit 140 Black V3 // Phanteks M25 140mm // Display: Bezel 32MD845 V2 QHD // Keychron K8 Pro (Mod: Gateron black box ink; Tape mode on PCB and Keycaps) // Razer Cobra Wired Mouse // Audio Technica M50X Headphone // Sennheiser HD 650 // Genius SP-HF180 USB Speaker //

 

And Laptop Acer Nitro 5 AN515-45 for mobility

Phone:

iPhone 11 (with battery replaced instead of buying new phone for long term and not submitting (fully) to Apple Lord

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

×