Jump to content

8K Display with Built-GPU plus Thunderbolt idea

Johnny64

I apologize for the dumb question, but wouldn't it be possible to create a display with a built-in GPU and then just connect it to a computer using Thunderbolt?

 

I remember that some early 4K displays were basically 2 displays in one and required 2 cables to connect them to your graphics card or cards.  Why not take 2 ARM GPUs, connect one to each side of a screen, then connect them to a computer via a Thunderbolt? 

 

The built-in GPU(s) could be used mainly for playing 8K video or light gaming.  With multi-adapter support on Vulkan or Directx12, you could use the computer's on-board graphics and/or a discreet graphics card for more serious gaming.

 

That way, you could connect almost any computer to an 8K screen and it would work.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Johnny64 said:

I remember that some early 4K displays were basically 2 displays in one and required 2 cables to connect them to your graphics card or cards.  Why not take 2 ARM GPUs, connect one to each side of a screen, then connect them to a computer via a Thunderbolt? 

The need for two cables was for enough bandwidth to drive such a high resolution display. One cable didn't provide enough bandwidth. 

Main System: Phobos

AMD Ryzen 7 2700 (8C/16T), ASRock B450 Steel Legend, 16GB G.SKILL Aegis DDR4 3000MHz, AMD Radeon RX 570 4GB (XFX), 960GB Crucial M500, 2TB Seagate BarraCuda, Windows 10 Pro for Workstations/macOS Catalina

 

Secondary System: York

Intel Core i7-2600 (4C/8T), ASUS P8Z68-V/GEN3, 16GB GEIL Enhance Corsa DDR3 1600MHz, Zotac GeForce GTX 550 Ti 1GB, 240GB ADATA Ultimate SU650, Windows 10 Pro for Workstations

 

Older File Server: Yet to be named

Intel Pentium 4 HT (1C/2T), Intel D865GBF, 3GB DDR 400MHz, ATI Radeon HD 4650 1GB (HIS), 80GB WD Caviar, 320GB Hitachi Deskstar, Windows XP Pro SP3, Windows Server 2003 R2

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Jamiec1130 said:

The need for two cables was for enough bandwidth to drive such a high resolution display. One cable didn't provide enough bandwidth. 

Thanks for the quick reply! OK, I understand that.  But my idea is to help take the burden off of the computer's GPU, so that you could connect any computer to an 8K screen and use to play 8K video or very light gaming right away.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

20 hours ago, Johnny64 said:

I apologize for the dumb question, but wouldn't it be possible to create a display with a built-in GPU and then just connect it to a computer using Thunderbolt?

 

I remember that some early 4K displays were basically 2 displays in one and required 2 cables to connect them to your graphics card or cards.  Why not take 2 ARM GPUs, connect one to each side of a screen, then connect them to a computer via a Thunderbolt? 

 

The built-in GPU(s) could be used mainly for playing 8K video or light gaming.  With multi-adapter support on Vulkan or Directx12, you could use the computer's on-board graphics and/or a discreet graphics card for more serious gaming.

 

That way, you could connect almost any computer to an 8K screen and it would work.

 

 

You have a valid idea but here's what I think why it won't happen. 

Back just two years ago gaming at 4k was a crazy thought because even most of the computers people own these days can barely handle 4k.

Initially, it is only the enthusiasts and the professionals who needs/wants better panel are pushing the industry and since we already are equipped with the latest and greatest stuff, there is no need for a built-in gpu so that people with regular average rigs can use them as well.

Yes I do agree that it will help maybe when I want to hook it up with my Macbook Pro or w.e but the enthusiasts won't stop buying them because their laptop can't drive it and the average people who only have a laptop or not-powerful-enough PC probably don't even know 8k is out. 

Eventually, by adding built-in GPUs, you are adding the cost to the potential customers and doing a favour for the people who won't be buying until 8k is as common as 1440p.

 

Sorry my logic is flying everywhere :D

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

 

Personal Desktop":

CPU: Intel Core i7 10700K @5ghz |~| Cooling: bq! Dark Rock Pro 4 |~| MOBO: Gigabyte Z490UD ATX|~| RAM: 16gb DDR4 3333mhzCL16 G.Skill Trident Z |~| GPU: RX 6900XT Sapphire Nitro+ |~| PSU: Corsair TX650M 80Plus Gold |~| Boot:  SSD WD Green M.2 2280 240GB |~| Storage: 1x3TB HDD 7200rpm Seagate Barracuda + SanDisk Ultra 3D 1TB |~| Case: Fractal Design Meshify C Mini |~| Display: Toshiba UL7A 4K/60hz |~| OS: Windows 10 Pro.

Luna, the temporary Desktop:

CPU: AMD R9 7950XT  |~| Cooling: bq! Dark Rock 4 Pro |~| MOBO: Gigabyte Aorus Master |~| RAM: 32G Kingston HyperX |~| GPU: AMD Radeon RX 7900XTX (Reference) |~| PSU: Corsair HX1000 80+ Platinum |~| Windows Boot Drive: 2x 512GB (1TB total) Plextor SATA SSD (RAID0 volume) |~| Linux Boot Drive: 500GB Kingston A2000 |~| Storage: 4TB WD Black HDD |~| Case: Cooler Master Silencio S600 |~| Display 1 (leftmost): Eizo (unknown model) 1920x1080 IPS @ 60Hz|~| Display 2 (center): BenQ ZOWIE XL2540 1920x1080 TN @ 240Hz |~| Display 3 (rightmost): Wacom Cintiq Pro 24 3840x2160 IPS @ 60Hz 10-bit |~| OS: Windows 10 Pro (games / art) + Linux (distro: NixOS; programming and daily driver)
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

×