Jump to content

Battlefield 4 OFFICIAL Release Benchmarks: NVIDIA & AMD

digitalnav
 Share
Posted

Seeing that BF4 is a graphical upgrade form bf3 but not in an extreme form, I expected the Titan for example to reach 80-90 at least :S I hope performance increases will be seen with newer drivers, or DICE is just giving Nvidia the finger :L

i5 4670k - MSI GTX 770 gaming - Fractal design define R4 (windowed) - MSI Z87-G45 gaming - be quiet! Dark Rock Pro 2 - Corsair vengeance 8 gb (lp) - WB black 1tb - 256GB SSD - Corsair TX 750M - Ducky Shine 3

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Link to post
Share on other sites
Posted
  • Author

Seeing that BF4 is a graphical upgrade form bf3 but not in an extreme form, I expected the Titan for example to reach 80-90 at least :S I hope performance increases will be seen with newer drivers, or DICE is just giving Nvidia the finger :L

Hmm, we'll find out when I bench the R9 290x today!

Research and Development at Digital Storm

 

Personal Website: www.DigitalNav.net

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Link to post
Share on other sites
Posted

Hmm, we'll find out when I bench the R9 290x today!

Can we see the results before the video is out, I'm curious. Since I'm in the UK we don't get BF4 until friday. Itching to see how my 290x performs. 

AMD Ryzen 5900x, Nvidia RTX 3080 (MSI Gaming X-trio), ASrock X570 Extreme4, 32GB Corsair Vengeance RGB @ 3200mhz CL16, Corsair MP600 1TB, Intel 660P 1TB, Corsair HX1000, Corsair 680x, Corsair H100i Platinum

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Link to post
Share on other sites
Posted

Anyone notice the performance test in the graphics options while in game? I click it but it shows nothing?

9900K  / Noctua NH-D15S / Z390 Aorus Master / 32GB DDR4 Vengeance Pro 3200Mhz / eVGA 2080 Ti Black Ed / Morpheus II Core / Meshify C / LG 27UK650-W / PS4 Pro / XBox One X

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Link to post
Share on other sites
Posted
  • Author

Anyone notice the performance test in the graphics options while in game? I click it but it shows nothing?

Yeah I was having issues with that which is why I ran it through the same sequence over and over.

 

 

Can we see the results before the video is out, I'm curious. Since I'm in the UK we don't get BF4 until friday. Itching to see how my 290x performs. 

I'll try my best mate, should be up 2pm PST or 10pm UK time.

Research and Development at Digital Storm

 

Personal Website: www.DigitalNav.net

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Link to post
Share on other sites
Posted

Do you actually work for Digital Storm?

If so, I'd look into getting Industry Affiliate status.

Nice videos!

Intel i5 6600k~Asus Maximus VIII Hero~G.Skill Ripjaws 4 Series 8GB DDR4-3200 CL-16~Sapphire Radeon R9 Fury Tri-X~Phanteks Enthoo Pro M~Sandisk Extreme Pro 480GB~SeaSonic Snow Silent 750~BenQ XL2730Z QHD 144Hz FreeSync~Cooler Master Seidon 240M~Varmilo VA87M (Cherry MX Brown)~Corsair Vengeance M95~Oppo PM-3~Windows 10 Pro~http://pcpartpicker.com/p/ynmBnQ

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Link to post
Share on other sites
Posted
  • Author

Do you actually work for Digital Storm?

If so, I'd look into getting Industry Affiliate status.

Nice videos!

I do! Working with Linus/Slick to get it sorted.

 

amd benchmarks??

Ill have them up today! As well as 290x crossfire benchmarks.

Research and Development at Digital Storm

 

Personal Website: www.DigitalNav.net

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Link to post
Share on other sites
Posted

UPDATE: AMD R9 290X with Beta v7 got 67.2 fps... I was honestly expecting more.

 is that minimum/average/max ?

AMD Ryzen 5900x, Nvidia RTX 3080 (MSI Gaming X-trio), ASrock X570 Extreme4, 32GB Corsair Vengeance RGB @ 3200mhz CL16, Corsair MP600 1TB, Intel 660P 1TB, Corsair HX1000, Corsair 680x, Corsair H100i Platinum

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Link to post
Share on other sites
Posted

Well this hasn't really changed since beta.

 

AMD CPU + Nvidia GPU works quite okay as always.

Intel CPU + Nvidia GPU works good as always.

Intel CPU + Radeon GPU works good as always.

 

AMD CPU + Radeon GPU works terrible...

 

bf4_cpu_gpu_d.png

 

bf4_cpu_gpu_t.png

 

http://pclab.pl/art55318.html

 

I have another two interesting graphs, something for FX 83xx owners:
 
bf4_windows_s.png
 
bf4_windows_m.png

][ CPU: Phenom II x6 1045t @3,7GHz ][ GPU: GTX 660 2GB ][ Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-MA770T-UD3P ][ RAM: 8GB @1450Mhz CL9 DDR3 ][ PSU: Chieftec 500AB A ][ Case: SilentiumPC Regnum L50 ][ CPU Cooler: CoolerMaster Hyper 212 Evo & Arctic MX4 ][

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Link to post
Share on other sites
Posted

In before somebody says that the review is false because AMD GPUs lose to Nvidia GPUs:

 

This is multiplayer tests i posted.

 

The reason singleplayer ones look a lot different is because singleplayer isnt that CPU demanding, so the CPU load from Radeon drivers doesn't matter. In Multiplayer all the CPUs are put to test under near 100% load thus the Nvidia multithreaded drivers help a lot to push additional frames.

 

here are singleplayer ones:

 

bf4_gpu_high_1920.png

][ CPU: Phenom II x6 1045t @3,7GHz ][ GPU: GTX 660 2GB ][ Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-MA770T-UD3P ][ RAM: 8GB @1450Mhz CL9 DDR3 ][ PSU: Chieftec 500AB A ][ Case: SilentiumPC Regnum L50 ][ CPU Cooler: CoolerMaster Hyper 212 Evo & Arctic MX4 ][

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Link to post
Share on other sites
Posted

May be a stupid question, but is kl./s the same thing as FPS?

My rig: CPU: Intel core i5 4670K MoBo: MSI Z87-G45 Gaming RAM: Kingston HyperX Beast 2x4GB 1600mhz CL9 GPU: EVGA GTX780 SC ACX SSD: ADATA Premier Pro SP900 256GBHDD: Western Digital RED 2TB PSU: FSP Aurum CM 750W Case: Cooler Master HAF XM OS: Windows 8 Pro

My Build log, the Snowbird (heavy WIP): http://linustechtips.com/main/topic/188011-snowbird-by-lachy/?hl=snowbird

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Link to post
Share on other sites
Posted

I take back my previous comment. We just have to wait for the official release to see whether mantle actually makes a difference.  

Spoiler
Spoiler

Project Depravity: £850 / ????? (03/12/2015) Case: Phanteks Enthoo Primo SE Red Keyboard: Corsair K95 RGB MX Red Monitors: 3* Asus PG279Q Stand: Ergotech Triple Desk Stand Webcam: Logitch C920

Spoiler

RIP in kill: CPU: Single core Celeron M @1.73GHz RAM: 1GB (512MB x2) DDR2 SO-DIMM Motherboard: Asus MOCA-AR HDD: 160GB SATA2 5400rpm

Spoiler

Current System: CPU: Intel i5-4690K Cooler: Cooler Master Hyper 212 EVO Motherboard: MSI Z97 Gaming 5 RAM: Kingston HyperX Fury 8GB 1866MHz GPU: Gigabyte Windforce 960 4GB SSD: Sandisk Ultra Plus 128GB HDD: WD Caviar Blue 1TB PSU: Corsair CX500M Case: Corsair 200R Windowed Monitor: LG 22MP55HQ 22" IPS + HP w19 Mouse: Roccat Savu Keyboard: Corsair Raptor K30 Mouse Pad: Perixx DX-1000XXL Headset: Kingston HyperX Cloud OS: Windows 10 Pro 64-bit 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Link to post
Share on other sites
Posted

Is this with the latest nvidia drivers that are said to give increased performance in BF4?

 

Either way I love how the 770 is beating the 280x :P

CPU: i5 4430 PSU: XFX 550w Ram: 8gb Patriot Viper 1600mhz


Motherboard: MSI H87M-G43 Case: Fractal Design Define R4


SSD: 840 Evo 250gb, 512gb MX100 GPU: MSI GTX 980TI Gaming Cooler: Hyper 212 Evo

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Link to post
Share on other sites
Posted

May be a stupid question, but is kl./s the same thing as FPS?

 

Yup.

][ CPU: Phenom II x6 1045t @3,7GHz ][ GPU: GTX 660 2GB ][ Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-MA770T-UD3P ][ RAM: 8GB @1450Mhz CL9 DDR3 ][ PSU: Chieftec 500AB A ][ Case: SilentiumPC Regnum L50 ][ CPU Cooler: CoolerMaster Hyper 212 Evo & Arctic MX4 ][

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Link to post
Share on other sites
Posted

Is this with the latest nvidia drivers that are said to give increased performance in BF4?

 

Either way I love how the 770 is beating the 280x :P

 

Reread the thread, i posted another graph. It's due to drivers from Nvidia vs AMD drivers. The CPU load is totally different because Nvidia makes multithreaded drivers, that actually helps REDUCE the load from the CPU => pushing more frames per second in multiplayer. Singleplayer is the other way around, CPU doesnt matter, only GPU matters and AMD GPUs DO have a lead there! :)

][ CPU: Phenom II x6 1045t @3,7GHz ][ GPU: GTX 660 2GB ][ Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-MA770T-UD3P ][ RAM: 8GB @1450Mhz CL9 DDR3 ][ PSU: Chieftec 500AB A ][ Case: SilentiumPC Regnum L50 ][ CPU Cooler: CoolerMaster Hyper 212 Evo & Arctic MX4 ][

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Link to post
Share on other sites
Posted

Yup.

I can't understand that a 780 has basically the same results as 770 and Radeons fall back THAT much, the game is optimized for them anyway :o

My rig: CPU: Intel core i5 4670K MoBo: MSI Z87-G45 Gaming RAM: Kingston HyperX Beast 2x4GB 1600mhz CL9 GPU: EVGA GTX780 SC ACX SSD: ADATA Premier Pro SP900 256GBHDD: Western Digital RED 2TB PSU: FSP Aurum CM 750W Case: Cooler Master HAF XM OS: Windows 8 Pro

My Build log, the Snowbird (heavy WIP): http://linustechtips.com/main/topic/188011-snowbird-by-lachy/?hl=snowbird

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Link to post
Share on other sites
Posted

Reread the thread, i posted another graph. It's due to drivers from Nvidia vs AMD drivers. The CPU load is totally different because Nvidia makes multithreaded drivers, that actually helps REDUCE the load from the CPU => pushing more frames per second in multiplayer. Singleplayer is the other way around, CPU doesnt matter, only GPU matters and AMD GPUs DO have a lead there! :)

They do, I noticed, and was saddened because I probably should retract my statement.

CPU: i5 4430 PSU: XFX 550w Ram: 8gb Patriot Viper 1600mhz


Motherboard: MSI H87M-G43 Case: Fractal Design Define R4


SSD: 840 Evo 250gb, 512gb MX100 GPU: MSI GTX 980TI Gaming Cooler: Hyper 212 Evo

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Link to post
Share on other sites
Posted

I can't understand that a 780 has basically the same results as 770 and Radeons fall back THAT much, the game is optimized for them anyway :o

 

Multiplayer, the CPUs are on 100% load pretty much. Can't drive the GPU any faster => bottleneck.

 

Singleplayer does show the GPUs separate themselves.

][ CPU: Phenom II x6 1045t @3,7GHz ][ GPU: GTX 660 2GB ][ Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-MA770T-UD3P ][ RAM: 8GB @1450Mhz CL9 DDR3 ][ PSU: Chieftec 500AB A ][ Case: SilentiumPC Regnum L50 ][ CPU Cooler: CoolerMaster Hyper 212 Evo & Arctic MX4 ][

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Link to post
Share on other sites
Posted

Multiplayer, the CPUs are on 100% load pretty much. Can't drive the GPU any faster => bottleneck.

 

Singleplayer does show the GPUs separate themselves.

Do you have benchmarks with 4930K? That would probably make it clearer.

My rig: CPU: Intel core i5 4670K MoBo: MSI Z87-G45 Gaming RAM: Kingston HyperX Beast 2x4GB 1600mhz CL9 GPU: EVGA GTX780 SC ACX SSD: ADATA Premier Pro SP900 256GBHDD: Western Digital RED 2TB PSU: FSP Aurum CM 750W Case: Cooler Master HAF XM OS: Windows 8 Pro

My Build log, the Snowbird (heavy WIP): http://linustechtips.com/main/topic/188011-snowbird-by-lachy/?hl=snowbird

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share
Go to topic listing Tech News

×