Unigine Valley Benchmark Scores Thread + SUPERPOSITION ***Over 1000 Submissions!***

[Zebster]

1 minute ago, done12many2 said:

 

Wow.  That 2600k is choking that card at 1080p.  Congrats on the 1080 Ti!

Thanks... Planing of upgrading my 2600K to the next 8700K. Your 5.3 GHz on the 7700K, is that on water?

[Zebster]

Just now, Zebster said:

Thanks... Planing of upgrading my 2600K to the next 8700K. Your 5.3 GHz on the 7700K, is that on water?

My bad... I saw your " Cooling: Custom Loop | 5 x EK 360mm rads | 2 x EK D5 PWM pumps | EK GPUs & CPU blocks " now :-D

[Jumper118]

30 minutes ago, Zebster said:

Thanks... Planing of upgrading my 2600K to the next 8700K. Your 5.3 GHz on the 7700K, is that on water?

what voltage are you running on the 2600k and what cooling do you have? 

[Zebster]

Take #2

I7 2600K@4.8 GHz

Mem 2133 MHz DDR3

Nvidia Geforce GTX 1080 Ti FE

[DildorTheDecent]

13 minutes ago, Jumper118 said:

what voltage are you running on the 2600k and what cooling do you have? 

His new CPU-Z screenshot suggests around 1.420V

 

plenty of headroom then. 

[Guest]

Should I trust Heaven score? Seems low compared to other cards but then again other games I tested ran as expected. Will go on with memory clock later

[Masada02]

4 hours ago, deXxterlab97 said:

Should I trust Heaven score? Seems low compared to other cards but then again other games I tested ran as expected. Will go on with memory clock later

Based on the scores I've seen I would guess that Valley doesn't make use of some of the new tech in the AMD cards. Only a guess though, but they don't seem to get the scores that coincide with where they actually perform in games.

[done12many2]

12 hours ago, deXxterlab97 said:

Should I trust Heaven score? Seems low compared to other cards but then again other games I tested ran as expected. Will go on with memory clock later

 

I suspect that you may be seeing first hand why we commonly/jokingly refer to Valley at 1080p as a CPU test.  You'll need higher clock speeds to rule it out.  That may be the reason you see similar cards with higher scores.

[Jumper118]

the rx480 doesnt have this problem at all  its just slower than a 7970 or 280x  

[Guest]

20 minutes ago, Jumper118 said:

the rx480 doesnt have this problem at all  its just slower than a 7970 or 280x  

Hmm ok

[Guest]

I'll do some more testings later. 

[Guest]

Don't feel like this problem is big enough for a thread but anyways

I can max out memory clock to 2250mhz (not touching voltages yet) 

I ran few valley benches, all stable no driver crash but got quite a low score compared to stock. So why? 

 

Also just retried valley with the above memory clock at 2200mhz but now with extreme hd and the score was lower than without changing the memory speed. 

 

I guess I should revert back? Core clock is absolute max already. 

[Jumper118]

3 hours ago, deXxterlab97 said:

Don't feel like this problem is big enough for a thread but anyways

I can max out memory clock to 2250mhz (not touching voltages yet) 

I ran few valley benches, all stable no driver crash but got quite a low score compared to stock. So why? 

 

Also just retried valley with the above memory clock at 2200mhz but now with extreme hd and the score was lower than without changing the memory speed. 

 

I guess I should revert back? Core clock is absolute max already. 

if you flash the bios you can set the ram timings to staying fixed at  2000mhz or 1750mhz timings which helps stop them going crazy, also you can set the limit for the memory clock way higher and give it a bit more power limit if you have the temperature headroom.

[Zebster]

On 12/3/2017 at 0:31 AM, Jumper118 said:

what voltage are you running on the 2600k and what cooling do you have? 

I'm running vcore@1.4V, my cooler is an Noctua NH-D14 :-) max temps around 75-80° C

[Jumper118]

3 hours ago, Zebster said:

I'm running vcore@1.4V, my cooler is an Noctua NH-D14 :-) max temps around 75-80° C

OK. Not much headroom On that then

[Guest]

Damn just dropped 100 pts from my first bench with same clocks. I think Valley is bitching with me

[Lays]

20 hours ago, deXxterlab97 said:

I'll do some more testings later. 

Close all that shet on your background and everything else, it'll help. Or just run on win 7, it gives huge points 

[Guest]

Just now, Lays said:

Close all that shet on your background and everything else, it'll help. Or just run on win 7, it gives huge points 

I'm mainly testing for stability

[DildorTheDecent]

13 minutes ago, deXxterlab97 said:

I'm mainly testing for stability

Wrong program lol

[Guest]

[Guest]

Who would have thought closing programs could have helped?

[Jumper118]

1 hour ago, deXxterlab97 said:

Who would have thought closing programs could have helped?

Well considering your cpu is lock and therefore slow and you are using a very new gpu with some kind of memory compression it does make perfect sense. It's the same with any 900 or 1000 series nvidia gpu as well. Just is way worse on amd cards for some reason.  

[Guest]

58 minutes ago, Jumper118 said:

Well considering your cpu is lock and therefore slow and you are using a very new gpu with some kind of memory compression it does make perfect sense. It's the same with any 900 or 1000 series nvidia gpu as well. Just is way worse on amd cards for some reason.  

Alright, I'll see what Win7 gives

Btw the doc doesn't seperate different vram 

So 1060 3gb and 1060 6gb gets grouped together as 1060

Also is this normal to get max memory clock?

[Herman Mcpootis]

not sure how i got results worse than an fx 8300, but:

CPU: E5 2670 V2(ES) 2.3ghz stock, 2.8ghz boost

GPU: R9 fury Nitro 1050mhz core clock, 500mhz memory clock

average FPS: 46.1(1440p), 66.2(1080p)

score: 1929(1440p), 2771(1080p)

 

[Zebster]

19 hours ago, Jumper118 said:

OK. Not much headroom On that then

Nope but it's rock stable