Jump to content

Razer Blade 1060 overview (with temps)

L0veless

 

Surprisingly cooler than expected. What do you guys think?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, L0veless said:

 

Surprisingly cooler than expected. What do you guys think?

I feel like most Gaming Laptops are so overpriced or don't offer a wide enough range of price points.

 

It'd be nice if OEMs tried to target $1000 laptops with AMD Radeon RX 470 for notebooks with a Core i5-6300HQ

Judge a product on its own merits AND the company that made it.

How to setup MSI Afterburner OSD | How to make your AMD Radeon GPU more efficient with Radeon Chill | (Probably) Why LMG Merch shipping to the EU is expensive

Oneplus 6 (Early 2023 to present) | HP Envy 15" x360 R7 5700U (Mid 2021 to present) | Steam Deck (Late 2022 to present)

 

Mid 2023 AlTech Desktop Refresh - AMD R7 5800X (Mid 2023), XFX Radeon RX 6700XT MBA (Mid 2021), MSI X370 Gaming Pro Carbon (Early 2018), 32GB DDR4-3200 (16GB x2) (Mid 2022

Noctua NH-D15 (Early 2021), Corsair MP510 1.92TB NVMe SSD (Mid 2020), beQuiet Pure Wings 2 140mm x2 & 120mm x1 (Mid 2023),

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, L0veless said:

Surprisingly cooler than expected. What do you guys think?

useless. no clock speeds. it could be running at 900mhz for all we know. He also says it ran cooler than the 970m. So either his testing methodology is fucked, or Razer power throttles the 1060.

Laptop Main

(Retired) Zbook 15: i7-6820HQ, M2000M, 32gb, 512gb SSD + 2tb HDD, 4k Dreamcolor

(Retired) Alienware 15 R3: i7-6820HK, GTX1070, 16gb, 512 SSD + 1tb HDD, 1080p

(Retired) T560: i7-6600U, HD520, 16gb, 512gb SSD, 1620p

(Retired) P650RS: i7-6820HK, 1070, 16gb, 512gb + 1tb HDD, 4k Samsung PLS

(Retired) MBP 2012 Retina: i7-3820QM, GT650M, 16gb, 512gb SSD, 1800p

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

32 minutes ago, Pendragon said:

useless. no clock speeds. it could be running at 900mhz for all we know. He also says it ran cooler than the 970m. So either his testing methodology is fucked, or Razer power throttles the 1060.

 

He did say he didn't notice throttling, doesn't that imply it's running at top 1060 speed?

 

I do think something's wrong there, it doesn't seem physically possible for the 1060 to run cooler than a 970m in the same chassis, but if data proves me wrong I won't dispute it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, L0veless said:

He did say he didn't notice throttling, doesn't that imply it's running at top 1060 speed?

Look at the graph. And make your own assessment. Then look at supporting evidence provided by other sources. That's what I think. If he does a Unigine Heaven endurance run and shows clock speed graph with temp graph I'll say otherwise of course. 

Laptop Main

(Retired) Zbook 15: i7-6820HQ, M2000M, 32gb, 512gb SSD + 2tb HDD, 4k Dreamcolor

(Retired) Alienware 15 R3: i7-6820HK, GTX1070, 16gb, 512 SSD + 1tb HDD, 1080p

(Retired) T560: i7-6600U, HD520, 16gb, 512gb SSD, 1620p

(Retired) P650RS: i7-6820HK, 1070, 16gb, 512gb + 1tb HDD, 4k Samsung PLS

(Retired) MBP 2012 Retina: i7-3820QM, GT650M, 16gb, 512gb SSD, 1800p

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Maybe he did a Throttlestop fix and then overclocked the gpu. Because by default razer has it underclocked. The strange thing is it doesn't increase temperatures, max it goes to is 82 c. It could be that razer cherry picked the blade for him. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

With a few after market fixes, the new blade seems to get the desired 1060 performance without thermal throttling and usually hits mid 80's for temps.  Pretty impressive for the form factor.  But again, a thicker laptop should have more headroom to out perform this, be cooler and quieter.  You're paying for the macbook like build quality and size.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

He doesn't once show GPU clockspeeds... but his Overwatch gameplay (which he says is at 1080p) shows worse FPS than my 780M SLI got, which indicates that the 1060 wasn't performing as it should. It should be better than my machine's stock SLI setup, which means 120fps in matches or more is par for the course.

 

I don't like half-assed "reviews" like this, they don't tell nearly the whole story and are designed to sell a PC and not review it.

 

Also, there is ZERO way that a 970M is hotter than a 1060. It's physically impossible.

I have finally moved to a desktop. Also my guides are outdated as hell.

 

THE INFORMATION GUIDES: SLI INFORMATION || vRAM INFORMATION || MOBILE i7 CPU INFORMATION || Maybe more someday

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

×