Zotac 750ti 2gb vs EVGA GeForce GTX 750Ti 2gb (regular)

[eolson]

Which one is stronger, which one will work better on 300 watts

[don_svetlio]

Both are the same and both perform poorly nowadays. Take it from someone who has used a 750 Ti-level card - you are looking at low settings 30fps or less

[eolson]

1 minute ago, don_svetlio said:

Both are the same and both perform poorly nowadays. Take it from someone who has used a 750 Ti-level card - you are looking at low settings 30fps or less

everyone who uses the zotac says they can run skyrim and gta at ultra with a 60 fps average

[don_svetlio]

1 minute ago, eolson said:

everyone who uses the zotac says they can run skyrim and gta at ultra with a 60 fps average

And I am telling you that unless they are talking 720p and no AA then they are lying out of their ass. Want me to make a video showing you 30fps at 1080p skyrim on high (not ultra)? Cuase I can.

[eolson]

1 minute ago, don_svetlio said:

And I am telling you that unless they are talking 720p and no AA then they are lying out of their ass. Want me to make a video showing you 30fps at 1080p skyrim on high (not ultra)? Cuase I can.

im talking about 720p

[don_svetlio]

1 minute ago, eolson said:

im talking about 720p

Even then you can't run AA on a 750 Ti - the card is too slow to process it and sustain 60fps. Look, the 750 Ti has outlived its usefulness. It began its life as a low-end card in 2013. It is now 2016 and that card is VERY VERY low-end. Slower than ANYTHING that is coming out, even in laptops. Intel Iris Pro Graphics are beating it. Sad reality of the situation. Best thing to do is either wait for the RX 460 or GT 1040 or buy a R7 370

[eolson]

1 minute ago, don_svetlio said:

Even then you can't run AA on a 750 Ti - the card is too slow to process it and sustain 60fps. Look, the 750 Ti has outlived its usefulness. It began its life as a low-end card in 2013. It is now 2016 and that card is VERY VERY low-end. Slower than ANYTHING that is coming out, even in laptops. Intel Iris Pro Graphics are beating it. Sad reality of the situation. Best thing to do is either wait for the RX 460 or GT 1040 or buy a R7 370

no aa, 720p, I dont really care about aa or 1080p

[don_svetlio]

1 minute ago, eolson said:

no aa, 720p, I dont really care about aa or 1080p

What about next year, when a new game comes out and it runs at 10fps? Will you care then? When you want to play it but can't run it?

[eolson]

1 minute ago, don_svetlio said:

What about next year, when a new game comes out and it runs at 10fps? Will you care then? When you want to play it but can't run it?

this is basically intill christmas

[don_svetlio]

1 minute ago, eolson said:

this is basically intill christmas

Just save up and get a better product rather than waste 100$ now for something you'll throw away

[eolson]

7 minutes ago, don_svetlio said:

Just save up and get a better product rather than waste 100$ now for something you'll throw away

meh

[Autoimmunity]

4 minutes ago, eolson said:

meh

If anything, at least wait for something like the RX 460 to release.  It supposedly has 960-level performance, and will be much much faster than a 750ti, while probably being around the same $100 price point.

 

I agree with don_svetlio, the 750ti is a poor purchase at this point.  It was fantastic 2 years ago, but times have changed.  It is not a good card for GTA, and it certainly isn't a good card for Skyrim if you plan on doing any modding.  

[eolson]

1 minute ago, Autoimmunity said:

If anything, at least wait for something like the RX 460 to release.  It supposedly has 960-level performance, much much faster than a 750ti.

 

I agree with don_svetlio, the 750ti is a poor purchase at this point.  It was fantastic 2 years ago, but times have changed.  It is not a good card for GTA, and it certainly isn't a good card for Skyrim if you plan on doing any modding.  

I don't really want to do ENBs, I dont have gta anyhow

[Autoimmunity]

10 minutes ago, eolson said:

I don't really want to do ENBs, I dont have gta anyhow

There may be another game next year that you would like to play.  The 750ti is going to be unusable for any 2017 games other than indie titles.  Wait a bit, or spend some more, and have a more future-proof solution.

[eolson]

1 minute ago, Autoimmunity said:

There may be another game next year that you would like to play.  The 750ti is going to be unusable for any 2017 games other than indie titles.  Wait a bit, or spend some more, and have a more future-proof solution.

this is a temporary card intill my birthday/christmas I'll probably get a rx 470 and a new psu at christmas

[Autoimmunity]

3 hours ago, eolson said:

this is a temporary card intill my birthday/christmas I'll probably get a rx 470 and a new psu at christmas

In that case, search for used cards on Ebay.  You'll find a better card for a lower price.  Might be able to get a 660ti for $50 or so.

[eolson]

1 hour ago, Autoimmunity said:

In that case, search for used cards on Ebay.  You'll find a better card for a lower price.  Might be able to get a 660ti for $50 or so.

can the 660ti work on 300 watts?

[Zodiark1593]

21 minutes ago, eolson said:

can the 660ti work on 300 watts?

Ekk, that PSU. Again though, all the more reason to wait for the Radeon 460. Performance about on par with the GTX 960 (more than 2x the 750 TI), $100 price tag, and it should be able to run on just power from the PCI-e slot.

[Gerr]

EVGA >>> Zotac

[Taja]

I have the evga SC 750ti and im happy with it. My res is 1440x900 and i play witcher 3 with médium/high settings at 45~55 fps.

[don_svetlio]

10 minutes ago, Taja said:

I have the evga SC 750ti and im happy with it. My res is 1440x900 and i play witcher 3 with médium/high settings at 45~55 fps.

I'd like a video showing it as those are the results of R9 270s and that card is MUCH more powerful

[Taja]

13 hours ago, don_svetlio said:

I'd like a video showing it as those are the results of R9 270s and that card is MUCH more powerful

Well, i wont be making a vídeo,but i can make some screens (settings and fps in some areas).

But yeah, most of my settings are med/high, and fps average is 45 i would say (40 in novigrad, 50~ in skellige)

[don_svetlio]

1 minute ago, Taja said:

Well, i wont be making a vídeo,but i can make some screens (settings and fps in some areas).

But yeah, most of my settings are med/high, and fps average is 45 i would say (40 in novigrad, 50~ in skellige)

I still find that a bit odd - again, my 280 gets similar results and that is over double the performance of a 750 Ti. I've also tinked with a 750 Ti and I can assure you that medium-high 50fps is odd to say the least. I get 45-50 on low.

[Taja]

6 minutes ago, don_svetlio said:

I still find that a bit odd - again, my 280 gets similar results and that is over double the performance of a 750 Ti. I've also tinked with a 750 Ti and I can assure you that medium-high 50fps is odd to say the least. I get 45-50 on low.

Strange... remember my res is 1440x900, you testes in this res?

I dont remember the settings for fallout 4, but i played it with nice fps (65 avg) and it was on NVidia GeForce experience "optimized" mode

[don_svetlio]

1 minute ago, Taja said:

Strange... remember my res is 1440x900, you testes in this res?

I dont remember the settings for fallout 4, but i played it with nice fps (65 avg) and it was on NVidia GeForce experience "optimized" mode

Yes, I do. But it still makes 0 sense for those results. You sure you don't have grass density or population density on low?