Jump to content

Why has SCSI decided to rear its ugly head back into the world?

Hi all.

 

I have recently watched the Techquickie video about SATA vs. SAS.

 

I know that having things like PATA and SATA stopped the need to use SCSI.

 

Why didn't the developers of SAS just develop it for SATA so anyone can use it.

 

C'mon SCSI developers, SCSI is like way too old, at least by today's standards. Develop something like SAS but for SATA. 

2017 Gaming PC

Excellent value machine, keeps me going.

CPU: Intel Core i5-6600K | GPU: Nvidia GeForce GTX 1080 8GB | RAM: 16GB DDR4 | Motherboard: MSI Z170A XPOWER GAMING TITANIUM

PSU: Casecom 600W PSU | Case: Corsair Graphite 230T | SSD: Samsung 850 EVO 250GB | HDD: 3TB WD Blue

Dell XPS 15 9560

Beautiful laptop, in a stunning form factor.

CPU: Intel Core i7-7700HQ | GPU: Intel HD Graphics 630/Nvidia GeForce GTX 1050 (not mobile, full GPU) | RAM: 16GB DDR4 | SSD: 512GB SK Hynix SSD

Display: 4K IPS 100% Adobe RGB Touch Panel | I/O: Two USB 3.0 with PowerShare, HDMI, 3.5mm Headphone Jack, SD Card Slot, and Thunderbolt 3 USB-C

Samsung Galaxy S8 64GB | Samsung Galaxy Tab S2 9.7 32GB

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

because sas is 4x faster than sata, and aside from cost doesnt really have any extra disadvantages.

(edit: should clarify: 2x the troughput, and sas being full duplex over sata's half duplex adds up to "theoretical" 4x speed)

 

and its not because the scsi standard is old that it shouldnt be used, look down at your keyboard, that layout is older than your grandma, and its still just fine today.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi all.

 

I have recently watched the Techquickie video about SATA vs. SAS.

 

I know that having things like PATA and SATA stopped the need to use SCSI.

 

Why didn't the developers of SAS just develop it for SATA so anyone can use it.

 

C'mon SCSI developers, SCSI is like way too old, at least by today's standards. Develop something like SAS but for SATA. 

 

You know that SAS stands for Serial Attached SCSI and accepts SATA disks natively right, it was in the video. The SCSI command sets were specifically designed more multi user access for servers, something not required for desktops. This is just a general compatibility issue when upgrading existing technologies.

 

Also SAS allows you to run multiple disks per port unlike SATA, something also not required for desktops. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

OP doesn't know the difference between SCSI and SAS 

lel

muh specs 

Gaming and HTPC (reparations)- ASUS 1080, MSI X99A SLI Plus, 5820k- 4.5GHz @ 1.25v, asetek based 360mm AIO, RM 1000x, 16GB memory, 750D with front USB 2.0 replaced with 3.0  ports, 2 250GB 850 EVOs in Raid 0 (why not, only has games on it), some hard drives

Screens- Acer preditor XB241H (1080p, 144Hz Gsync), LG 1080p ultrawide, (all mounted) directly wired to TV in other room

Stuff- k70 with reds, steel series rival, g13, full desk covering mouse mat

All parts black

Workstation(desk)- 3770k, 970 reference, 16GB of some crucial memory, a motherboard of some kind I don't remember, Micomsoft SC-512N1-L/DVI, CM Storm Trooper (It's got a handle, can you handle that?), 240mm Asetek based AIO, Crucial M550 256GB (upgrade soon), some hard drives, disc drives, and hot swap bays

Screens- 3  ASUS VN248H-P IPS 1080p screens mounted on a stand, some old tv on the wall above it. 

Stuff- Epicgear defiant (solderless swappable switches), g600, moutned mic and other stuff. 

Laptop docking area- 2 1440p korean monitors mounted, one AHVA matte, one samsung PLS gloss (very annoying, yes). Trashy Razer blackwidow chroma...I mean like the J key doesn't click anymore. I got a model M i use on it to, but its time for a new keyboard. Some edgy Utechsmart mouse similar to g600. Hooked to laptop dock for both of my dell precision laptops. (not only docking area)

Shelf- i7-2600 non-k (has vt-d), 380t, some ASUS sandy itx board, intel quad nic. Currently hosts shared files, setting up as pfsense box in VM. Also acts as spare gaming PC with a 580 or whatever someone brings. Hooked into laptop dock area via usb switch

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

You know that SAS stands for Serial Attached SCSI and accepts SATA disks natively right, it was in the video. The SCSI command sets were specifically designed more multi user access for servers, something not required for desktops. This is just a general compatibility issue when upgrading existing technologies.

 

Also SAS allows you to run multiple disks per port unlike SATA, something also not required for desktops. 

Yes, I totally forgot when I was creating this post.

2017 Gaming PC

Excellent value machine, keeps me going.

CPU: Intel Core i5-6600K | GPU: Nvidia GeForce GTX 1080 8GB | RAM: 16GB DDR4 | Motherboard: MSI Z170A XPOWER GAMING TITANIUM

PSU: Casecom 600W PSU | Case: Corsair Graphite 230T | SSD: Samsung 850 EVO 250GB | HDD: 3TB WD Blue

Dell XPS 15 9560

Beautiful laptop, in a stunning form factor.

CPU: Intel Core i7-7700HQ | GPU: Intel HD Graphics 630/Nvidia GeForce GTX 1050 (not mobile, full GPU) | RAM: 16GB DDR4 | SSD: 512GB SK Hynix SSD

Display: 4K IPS 100% Adobe RGB Touch Panel | I/O: Two USB 3.0 with PowerShare, HDMI, 3.5mm Headphone Jack, SD Card Slot, and Thunderbolt 3 USB-C

Samsung Galaxy S8 64GB | Samsung Galaxy Tab S2 9.7 32GB

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

×