similar?

[grayblizzard]

is a i5 4460 basically comparable to the fx8350 just different as one has more threads than the other

[Arwanell]

in gaming i5 destroys 8350

in editing/rendering 8350 is better, but not such a huge difference

[Guest Kloaked]

No. The i5 kicks it's ass for the most part.

[ADZ_123_!"£]

is a i5 4460 basically comparable to the fx8350 just different as one has more threads than the other

No the I5 will give you much better performance in games. FX8350 is more comparable to an I3.

[Matrix Gaming]

I5 is way better the the 8350

[minibois]

is a i5 4460 basically comparable to the fx8350 just different as one has more threads than the other

You can compare them, but it wouldn't be a good comparison.

For gaming, the i5 is much better while in editing the FX chip might be better because for editing.. Really, moar cores = moar better.

[Aytex]

moar kores=more multitasking111

[H4X3R]

moar kores=more multitasking111

While that is usually the case, the 8350 is being outperformed by the i5 in EVERYTHING.

[Aytex]

8350 for multitasking i5 for more frames in one game we all win!!!!

[Aytex]

-snip-

im gonan go cry now 

[Arwanell]

im gonan go cry now 

 

i was joking

you are actually right, but give me one example of tasking, that i5 couldn't handle.. unless you are a maniac

[Atmos]

While that is usually the case, the 8350 is being outperformed by the i5 in EVERYTHING.

Let's not fancy it too hard, there are a lot of cases where the 8350 is plainly better

[Aytex]

i was joking

you are actually right, but give me one example of tasking, that i5 couldn't handle.. unless you are a maniac

Im not amd not intel fanboy i like to list pros and cons and make ppl feel unsure of which to get

[Aytex]

Overall just do the i5 for mainly gaming if you want just frames.

[H4X3R]

Let's not fancy it too hard, there are a lot of cases where the 8350 is plainly better

Yeah well, i owned an 8350 so i'd know. Give me proof in which the 8350 outperforms the i5 4460 at least semi-significantly.

[Atmos]

Yeah well, i owned an 8350 so i'd know. Give me proof in which the 8350 outperforms the i5 4460 at least semi-significantly.

Where to start.

Rendering in professional grade programs

Streaming game play while recording that gameplay

Hosting servers while gaming

Basically any heavy multitasking, as listed above as well as rendering in programs that have been written with at least some fluency and use more than two cores.

For someone like me the 9590 was more what I required when it came time to upgrade. It was only because of a raise and a sale that I was able to get the 4790k that I have now. For those of us out there who do heavy multitasking, and I mean heavy the more cores is far day better

[TechFun]

I had the FX 8120 then switched to Intel I was an AMD fanboy I have been wasting time

[H4X3R]

Where to start.

Rendering in professional grade programs

Streaming game play while recording that gameplay

Hosting servers while gaming

Basically any heavy multitasking, as listed above as well as rendering in programs that have been written with at least some fluency and use more than two cores.

For someone like me the 9590 was more what I required when it came time to upgrade. It was only because of a raise and a sale that I was able to get the 4790k that I have now. For those of us out there who do heavy multitasking, and I mean heavy the more cores is far day better

Proof, not just claims.

 

e.g. GT 210 > GTX 980 because i said so.

[Atmos]

Proof, not just claims.

 

e.g. GT 210 > GTX 980 because i said so.

 

Geekbench Average scores

8350:      12,796 Winner

I5 4460:  10,351 

 

Passmark Average scores

8350:      9,134 Winner

I5 4460:  6,676

 

Passmark single-core

8350:      1,525

I5 4460:  1,960 Winner

 

As reported by: Cpubenchmark.net, Scores are based on averages submitted by users through the program

AMD FX-8350 @ Stock: 8,981 Winner

Intel I5 4460 @ Stock:    6,682

 

As reported by: Cpu.benchmark.com

The 8350 is approximately 43% faster when calculating floating point integers when run in their Multicore mixed speed test. "A multi-core server orientated integer and floating point CPU benchmark test."

 

The proof is in the puddin'. The 8350 still kicks ass When it is able to use all of its cores, much like in rendering.

 

http://www.cpubenchmark.net/high_end_cpus.html

http://browser.primatelabs.com/processor-benchmarks

http://cpu.userbenchmark.com/Compare/Intel-Core-i5-4460-vs-AMD-FX-8350/2310vs1489

 

It's been a long time since I've had to put that much effort into proving that I still know what im talking about. Last time that happened was when someone proclaimed that AMD had no gpu competition against nvidia. Let's just say, me and plenty of others had some, words, with them.