China cracks down on explicit anime

[Guest Strangerbob]

....i think all countries should ban it.. what pervert gets their jollies off on cartoon porn?????? 

 

... annoying little child; go back to 4chan

[Gozert]

China censors so much stuff it isn't even funny. Any game that has blood or bones in it has those parts either modified or removed. 'China.

[Doobeedoo]

What a joke.

Accused of being too sexually suggestive, containing "particularly bloody" beheading scene that would cause "extreme discomfort" and anime about nuclear weapon attack that is said to glorify violence and criminal activities? Really?

 

And then there are movies in theaters with way worse content with actual actors and life like effects which have blood and war and all kind of violence and people enjoy and laugh at it and that is simply normal. But anime which contains explicit content is worse?

 

I laughed, a little.

[ivan134]

and lots of people are pedophiles too.. doesn't mean that's right..

if you like cartoon boobs that's you're choice.. I don't.. and as this is a forum a place to give opinion and free speech I choose to point out my opinion.

Let me guess, you also think homosexuality is the same as pedophilia and beastiality too?

[Admire]

and lots of people are pedophiles too.. doesn't mean that's right..

if you like cartoon boobs that's you're choice.. I don't.. and as this is a forum a place to give opinion and free speech I choose to point out my opinion.

 

What are .... you are.....Are you seriously comparing people who watch anime to people who sexually abuse children?

 

I tried to find a way to post what i want without going very much against COC, but i can't

 

But you are really the lowest of the low.

[ivan134]

What are .... you are.....Are you seriously comparing people who watch anime to people who sexually abuse children?

 

I tried to find a way to post what i want without going very much against COC, but i can't

 

But you are really the lowest of the low.

CoC is the same reason my response was tame.

[Admire]

Just wait for a bit, if you live in the US, Canada, or The UK, the joys of socialist paradise will soon force themselves upon you.

 

Yeah...because conservatives never ban anything....

 

I have been living in a country you definently would view a socialist countries for my entire, and nothing gets banned here.

 

No games, no movies...No censorship what so ever.

 

Where as the united states basically makes everything 16+ if the word blood in mentioned in something

[Trik'Stari]

Yeah...because conservatives never ban anything....

 

I have been living in a country you definently would view a socialist countries for my entire, and nothing gets banned here.

 

No games, no movies...No censorship what so ever.

 

Where as the united states basically makes everything 16+ if the word blood in mentioned in something

That's not a ban, it's "parental guidance"

 

And I did say, The US is heading in that direction. Did you even read the comment, or is this one of those "Trik said socialism, time to bash him" moments?

[Admire]

That's not a ban, it's "parental guidance"

 

And I did say, The US is heading in that direction. Did you even read the comment, or is this one of those "Trik said socialism, time to bash him" moments?

 

No not at all. You know that I generally don't bash you despite our differences...Told you before that I enjoy your posts.

 

You did bring socialism up without being prompted...You can't be mad when people respond

 

But if the US and the UK is heading in that direction, then Denmark must already be there right?

 

I was just pointing out that we don't ban stuff here, despite our socialistic system.....Even if you are right that you are heading in that direction, that maybe censorship doesn't automatically follow along.

 

I don't think you are heading anywhere near that direction, but thats another debate we have had before.

[Trik'Stari]

No not at all. You know that I generally don't bash you despite our differences...Told you before that I enjoy your posts.

 

You did bring socialism up without being prompted...You can't be mad when people respond

 

But if the US and the UK is heading in that direction, then Denmark must already be there right?

 

I was just pointing out that we don't ban stuff here, despite our socialistic system.....Even if you are right that you are heading in that direction, that maybe censorship doesn't automatically follow along.

 

I don't think you are heading anywhere near that direction, but thats another debate we have had before.

Considering how easy it is to shut someone's argument down with "that's offensive!"...we're heading that way. How long before we have laws making it illegal to offend someone?

 

Think of it this way, the conservatives in this country want to reduce welfare, and make it harder to get, because they think it will encourage people to work for a living and support themselves, rather than feeding off the rest of society's hard work (that's not everyone on welfare, but go work in a liquor store and you will realize, it's a LARGE percentage, I used to see at least 8-10 people a day standing in front of my store trying to sell their food stamps for cash so they could get cheap booze), and instead of making legitimate arguments, the democrats say "YOU HATE POOR PEOPLE, YOU WANT THEM TO STARVE!".

 

This country...ugh. There's no more civil discourse or discussion.

 

Edit: And just to point out, my store was in a relatively well off rural area, lots of rich people that lived primarily in DC, I can't imagine what an inner city liquor store is like

[Admire]

Considering how easy it is to shut someone's argument down with "that's offensive!"...we're heading that way. How long before we have laws making it illegal to offend someone?

 

Think of it this way, the conservatives in this country want to reduce welfare, and make it harder to get, because they think it will encourage people to work for a living and support themselves, rather than feeding off the rest of society's hard work (that's not everyone on welfare, but go work in a liquor store and you will realize, it's a LARGE percentage, I used to see at least 8-10 people a day standing in front of my store trying to sell their food stamps for cash so they could get cheap booze), and instead of making legitimate arguments, the democrats say "YOU HATE POOR PEOPLE, YOU WANT THEM TO STARVE!".

 

This country...ugh. There's no more civil discourse or discussion.

 

Edit: And just to point out, my store was in a relatively well off rural area, lots of rich people that lived primarily in DC, I can't imagine what an inner city liquor store is like

 

We agree that too many of the citizens in your country and oversensitive "Insert curse word...I realized the one i choose would be against COC"  who are just waiting for drama and taking offence....But I honestly don't see how that has anything to do with socialism.

 

There seems to be very little civil discourse of discussion..but it doesn't help that you seem to evenly divided about everything.

 

The part about the liquor store....

 

I understand you frustration with not enough people working...too many people on welfare.

But you talk about this like its a crisis recently created under some evil dictatorship

. It was created in 1939, and no conservative government has removed it.

Its just gives the wrong picture to blame socialism or democrats when your own side has done jack shit to do anything about it.

I think conservative politicians love it, since it gives them something to rail at.

 

The problem in the US from my perspective, is that your welfare systems doesn't seem to do the job that they should do. We have far more expansive welfare systems than you, but people tend to use them for far shorter periods.

 

My own theory is that there is much less bureaucracy here in terms of hiring and firing people, or opening up a new business.

 

 

edit: Just something a little random.

but isn't it kinda stupid in the first place to make it illegal to buy booze with food stamps?

Like i know that you are against welfare in general, but since they are using your money already, why the hell should we care that they are drinking themselves to death?

 

Seems like it would remove them from welfare earlier. I just dislike the whole "We will give you money, but you can only use it for good" stick....Thats like giving money to a homeless person and making him promise not to buy booze...Screw that! If I give money to a homeless person, he can use it for whatever he wants. If its a bottle of booze that makes him happy, then do that.

[Trik'Stari]

We agree that too many of the citizens in your country and oversensitive "Insert curse word...I realized the one i choose would be against COC"  who are just waiting for drama and taking offence....But I honestly don't see how that has anything to do with socialism.

 

There seems to be very little civil discourse of discussion..but it doesn't help that you seem to evenly divided about everything.

 

The part about the liquor store....

 

I understand you frustration with not enough people working...too many people on welfare.

But you talk about this like its a crisis recently created under some evil dictatorship

. It was created in 1939, and no conservative government has removed it.

Its just gives the wrong picture to blame socialism or democrats when your own side has done jack shit to do anything about it.

I think conservative politicians love it, since it gives them something to rail at.

 

The problem in the US from my perspective, is that your welfare systems doesn't seem to do the job that they should do. We have far more expansive welfare systems than you, but people tend to use them for far shorter periods.

 

My own theory is that there is much less bureaucracy here in terms of hiring and firing people, or opening up a new business.

You're absolutely right.

 

The major root problem, is that both parties do things not to fix problems, but to create new problems so that "we can fix this....when we win the next election!".

[Admire]

You're absolutely right.

 

The major root problem, is that both parties do things not to fix problems, but to create new problems so that "we can fix this....when we win the next election!".

 

Absolutely! Its 4-8 years of sabotage until the guy/girl we like gets in charge. And that happens no matter who it is.

 

Thats not exactly a brilliant way to run shit.

[Remilia]

China being China.

[suicidalfranco]

Thanks for the new suggestions for my anime list!

Any of them worth watching?

high school of the dead best boob physics, worth watching

blood-c awesome gore, worth watching

terror in resonance great story, worth watching

[suicidalfranco]

You would be surprised....

( ° ͜ʖ °) ( ° ͜ʖ °) ( ° ͜ʖ °) ( ° ͜ʖ °) ( ° ͜ʖ °) ( ° ͜ʖ °) ( ° ͜ʖ °) ( ° ͜ʖ °) ( ° ͜ʖ °) ( ° ͜ʖ °) ( ° ͜ʖ °)

[suicidalfranco]

Was a time where people just watched proper, good old fashioned porn for such things. 

 

Sigh, the good old days. 

screw the good ol' days! at least anime know how to act

[Bensemus]

I'm quite sure people don't jerk off to saw.. there's not enough boobs..

my point is...ITS A FREAKING CARTOON! real porn contains real people .. not drawn by some fat sweaty pervert who's never experienced the real thing..

1. keep stereotypes out of this as they serve no point except making you look closed minded towards the topic.

2. My point wasn't that people get off to Saw. My point was that you don't need to be a crazy serial killer to enjoy the movies. Just like you don't need to be into hentai to enjoy anime like High School of the Dead.

3. Pretty much all of the anime listed; High School of the Dead, Blood-C, Terror in Resonance have content that is repeated in countless other movies and tv shows. If the anime is to sexualized then rate it accordingly and don't air it while younger people are normally watching tv.

4. porn is sex. Why is it wrong for it to be drawn? If it's CP then ya it's wrong but otherwise it's another way for people to experience fetishes/fantasies that are not possible/socially acceptable (nuns come to mind). I totally understand if you personally don't like it or are completely disgusted by it. That's your opinion. I have stuff that is off putting to me but Is ok to other people. I don't engage in it and let the people who do enjoy it enjoy it. I'm not hurt and they are happy.

 

More and more people seem to think that if something is offensive to them it should be removed so they don't have to deal with it. If you find something offensive then leave it alone. It doesn't care about you and will be happy to see you leave.

[OlekKing]

Why doesn't China crack down on their fur farms which skin all kinds of animals while they are alive?

[PerfectTemplar]

Don't like violence yet continue to execute people. Make up your mind China.