More Titan X Benchmarks (On Par with Titan-Z, faster in Games)

[BiG StroOnZ]

 

 

 

 

 

Source: http://www.chiphell.com/thread-1251587-1-1.html

 

Source 2: http://tieba.baidu.com/p/3628183752?pn=1

 

The power of a Titan-Z in a single card @ 1440p, that's something people should be excited about. Noticed some grieving after some other benchmarks were released, but this really puts things into perspective for people. Also realize that this is not overclocked balls to the wall, if it overclocks anything like Maxwell, 1000-1200MHz is quite conservative. So expect a huge jump in performance when to bring it closer to say 980 Classified clocks of 1500-1550MHz. But short hand is, it still is as fast as a Titan-Z which is quite impressive, faster in games apparently.

[CoolaxGaming]

China youth development foundation?

[BiG StroOnZ]

China youth development foundation?

 

I included the ChipHell link too.

[carolkarine]

For anyone out there about to be butthurt over the X beating the Z, remember that the way this bench is done is by averaging framerates of 22 games. The end result is that the Z scores lower due to games which don't properly utilize the second chip in the Z.

[Deletive]

We get it it's a good card. Still more interested in the 390x though.

People say it's a 250w card. I'll take an extra 50watts for OpenCL though.
 

 

For anyone out there about to be butthurt over the X beating the Z, remember that the way this bench is done is by averaging framerates of 22 games. The end result is that the Z scores lower due to games which don't properly utilize the second chip in the Z.

 

 
This is more game/graphics development then actual gaming, So I'm not surprised.

[BiG StroOnZ]

For anyone out there about to be butthurt over the X beating the Z, remember that the way this bench is done is by averaging framerates of 22 games. The end result is that the Z scores lower due to games which don't properly utilize the second chip in the Z.

 

For it to be that close, I severely doubt any lack of utilization from the second chip happened. 

[Syntaxvgm]

This titan might actually be worth the sticker price to gaming enthusiasts with the money to spend? 

[KungPaoChino]

College tuition or a really fast graphics card???  College tuition

 

 

 

sike.... nvidia titan x bb <3

[JustCallMeVlad]

Source: http://www.chiphell.com/thread-1251587-1-1.html

Source 2: http://tieba.baidu.com/p/3628183752?pn=1

The power of a Titan-Z in a single card @ 1440p, that's something people should be excited about. Noticed some grieving after some other benchmarks were released, but this really puts things into perspective for people. Also realize that this is not overclocked balls to the wall, if it overclocks anything like Maxwell, 1000-1200MHz is quite conservative. So expect a huge jump in performance when to bring it closer to say 980 Classified clocks of 1500-1550MHz. But short hand is, it still is as fast as a Titan-Z which is quite impressive, faster in games apparently.

I'm not sure how sure 1500 core Is going to be with that huge die and reference cooler

[BonSie]

All the chiphell leaks last year where complete bogus.

Take them with a big grain of salt.

[Syntaxvgm]

All the chiphell leaks last year where complete bogus.

Take them with a big grain of salt.

This so much this. And the other source being videocardz, who are the WCCF of GPUs

[SteveGrabowski]

People say it's a 250w card.

 

OMGz it's a space heater, and they're releasing this now instead of 2 months ago when it could have been useful? U sux Nvidia

[Syntaxvgm]

OMGz it's a space heater, and they're releasing this now instead of 2 months ago when it could have been useful? U sux Nvidia

I have a feeling that if this card is as good as the two BS sites say it is, it's because they just took the current maxwell platform and made it run hotter or something. I knew they were holding back when the 980m's performance was so much closer to its desktop counterpart than previous mobile flagship cards. 

[BiG StroOnZ]

 

I'm not sure how sure 1500 core Is going to be with that huge die and reference cooler

 

I think once people at overclock.net get their hands on this card, and skyn3t releases a bios you will see 1500 core clocks easily. Also remember, Gigabyte released a Windforce 3x cooler for the Titan before.

 

All the chiphell leaks last year where complete bogus.

Take them with a big grain of salt.

 

Chiphell leaks are legit when they are closer to release of the actual card, before then not very reliable. For example, see their 980 leaks, on the money.

 

Here for reference, anyone doubting the legitimacy of these Titan X benchmarks, pulled up their "GM204" leaks weeks prior to actual 980/970 release:

 

 

 

Like I said, on the money.

 

 

[carolkarine]

For it to be that close, I severely doubt any lack of utilization from the second chip happened.

It's fairly close, but as shown by the benchmark it should be a bit slower than dual GK110

[CarlosRex]

Anything you compare to a Titan Z will look good. That card is a joke. The headline should say it's 50% faster than a GTX 970 and will cost 3 times as much. What a bargain right ?

[patrickjp93]

Anything you compare to a Titan Z will look good. That card is a joke. The headline should say it's 50% faster than a GTX 970 and will cost 3 times as much. What a bargain right ?

 

The Titan Z is a joke only until you put it in expert hands. Under water that card trounces the 295x2 straight back to the infernal pits from which it rose. 1150+MHz Titan Z lays it out flat (EK Waterblocks ftw).

[Guest Kloaked]

Can someone provide a post showing how close rumors of previously released cards were to the actual thing?

I'm probably going to save these alleged Titan X benchmarks for future reference when another generation of Nvidia cards are released.

[Notional]

The Titan Z is a joke only until you put it in expert hands. Under water that card trounces the 295x2 straight back to the infernal pits from which it rose. 1150+MHz Titan Z lays it out flat (EK Waterblocks ftw).

At the low low price of just 4000$ with blocks and custom loops. Get yours now with 2 easy payments of 1 kidney and half a liver.

No the titan z is a huge joke. Over priced and under performing.

Even staying with nvidia, 2x titan blacks would be cheaper and better performing, even without the additional water cooling.

The titan z should have used the same clever cooling solution, that the 295x2 has (that Asus co developed with Asetek for their Ares II). Shave off at least 500$ and it might have been useful, instead of the joke, that it is.

[That Norwegian Guy]

Anything you compare to a Titan Z will look good. That card is a joke. The headline should say it's 50% faster than a GTX 970 and will cost 3 times as much. What a bargain right ?

 

Are you forgetting that a Titan X has 12GB of VRAM and will keep outputting high performance at 4K/5K/8K when a 970 will simply chug/croak/die?

 

Not everyone plays on 1080p.

[BiG StroOnZ]

It's fairly close, but as shown by the benchmark it should be a bit slower than dual GK110

  

That is only because the only place where SLI or Crossfire scales perfectly is 3DMark and maybe Tomb Raider

Can someone provide a post showing how close rumors of previously released cards were to the actual thing?

I'm probably going to save these alleged Titan X benchmarks for future reference when another generation of Nvidia cards are released.

Those GM204 leaks I posted above came out about two weeks prior to 980/970 launch.

[Victorious Secret]

Its almost sad that people aren't willing to accept that the Titan X is one hell of a gaming card that will probably make 4K its slave, all off a twin slot, single GPU solution that will play very nicely with mini-ITX builds. 

[carolkarine]

Its almost sad that people aren't willing to accept that the Titan X is one hell of a gaming card that will probably make 4K its slave, all off a twin slot, single GPU solution that will play very nicely with mini-ITX builds.

People are more than willing to accept it. The confusion is that the benchmarks are showing lower than expected performance.

[Victorious Secret]

People are more than willing to accept it. The confusion is that the benchmarks are showing lower than expected performance.

 

It matches a dual GPU Titan Z...how is that lower than expected? 

If thats low, people need to get their expectations in order and stop dreaming in the clouds and come back to Earth. 

[patrickjp93]

At the low low price of just 4000$ with blocks and custom loops. Get yours now with 2 easy payments of 1 kidney and half a liver.

No the titan z is a huge joke. Over priced and under performing.

Even staying with nvidia, 2x titan blacks would be cheaper and better performing, even without the additional water cooling.

The titan z should have used the same clever cooling solution, that the 295x2 has (that Asus co developed with Asetek for their Ares II). Shave off at least 500$ and it might have been useful, instead of the joke, that it is.

$1200 now with the block. Please keep up. AMD isn't the only company capable of lowering prices. The cooling solution is not clever when it's the only option provided. As the only reference cooler it's an admittance of failure by AMD's engineers to be able to design an air cooler or any cooler themselves. Also, custom builders hate the 295x2 cooling solution. Being a closed loop there's a huge amount of disassembly involved if you want to get things done properly with a single large system loop or use your own better fans or a better radiator. No reference design should come as an AIO liquid cooling solution from the amateur patent trolls at Asetek. End of discussion.

The Titan Z is a superior card when put in proper hands, as I said.