BFH Beta meh performance

[APrettyCoolWalrus]

I am so excited for Battlefield Hardline and I got the beta when it came out. I noticed performance was actually pretty bad for my overclocked 780 (1077/1130). On Ultra settings at 1080p I was experiencing around 65-80 fps in the Bank map and performance went to shit the second a gas grenade went off or a molotov was thrown. Is this just because Hardline's graphics are more superior to BF4's or is it just unoptimized in it's beta form?

[X1XNobleX1X]

It's a Beta, probably with an old build of the game. It's just not properly optimized. 

I think BFH is running quite well.

With two Titans I get 70-80 on Ultra (AA off) with Nvidia surround. 

 

 

 

What monitors are you running to need more than 60FPS?

 

 

Sometimes, I think BFH graphics aren't as good as BF4. Maybe just because it's a beta. 

[SpagettiNinja]

Battlefield's graphics havent changed since BF3, so i would assume it is unoptimized.

[APrettyCoolWalrus]

It's a Beta, probably with an old build of the game. It's just not properly optimized. 

I think BFH is running quite well.

With two Titans I get 70-80 on Ultra (AA off) with Nvidia surround. 

 

 

 

What monitors are you running to need more than 60FPS?

 

 

Sometimes I think BFH graphics aren't as good as BF4. 

An ASUS VG248QE. It's one of those trashy 144hz "gaming" monitors.

[CoolaxGaming]

Battlefield's graphics havent changed since BF3, so i would assume it is unoptimized.

Frostbite 3 is better then frostbite 2.

So BF4 has better graphis then 2.

And @APrettyCoolWalrus Wut, isint the 780 neck to neck and even a little better then the 290x? At max settings @ 1080p I get roughly Minimum of 80ish and average of 100ish. About 20fps better then bf4. Or it might just be Im using DX12

[CoolaxGaming]

An ASUS VG248QE. It's one of those trashy 144hz "gaming" monitors.

Hows it trashy?

[APrettyCoolWalrus]

Hows it trashy?

It has red all over the back and a big "3D" symbol on the stand.

[APrettyCoolWalrus]

Frostbite 3 is better then frostbite 2.

So BF4 has better graphis then 2.

And @APrettyCoolWalrus Wut, isint the 780 neck to neck and even a little better then the 290x? At max settings @ 1080p I get roughly Minimum of 80ish and average of 100ish. About 20fps better then bf4. Or it might just be Im using DX12

Yeah I'm back on windows 7.

[CoolaxGaming]

It has red all over the back and a big "3D" symbol on the stand.

Lol ok It seems like Im to only one who likes red and black...

 

Yeah I'm back on windows 7.

Ouch. Seeing in chat comments, people were getting a LOT less fps on a 970 (Not cause of VRM its still under 3 gigs) then my 290x. Maybe they are only optimizing for AMD?

[APrettyCoolWalrus]

 

 

Ouch. Seeing in chat comments, people were getting a LOT less fps on a 970 (Not cause of VRM its still under 3 gigs) then my 290x. Maybe they are only optimizing for AMD?

If so that would hurt my feelings

[Pony080905]

I get a steady 60fps

I have a i5-4440

R9 290

16GB ram

[EpicAdom]

It's a beta. No surprise.

[as96]

I don't have any performance problem, running at 1080p 144Hz, ultra settings (I had to turn off HBAO), it never goes under 70fps

[IMPERIUS]

I think its not optimized. And imho I think bf4 and sometimes even 3 has better graphics, probablly becaise of the lightning

[Vrbas]

80-100+FPS Ultra on a 970. Windows 8.1. Game runs smooth no stutters or massive drops. BFH graphics are not as good as BF4 as BFH is reskined BF3. Everyone should have better performance on this game over BF4

[APrettyCoolWalrus]

Maybe it's the fact that I'm on W7. I guess performance will be better come launch time.

[sgtcool]

Frostbite 3 is better then frostbite 2.

So BF4 has better graphis then 2.

And @APrettyCoolWalrus Wut, isint the 780 neck to neck and even a little better then the 290x? At max settings @ 1080p I get roughly Minimum of 80ish and average of 100ish. About 20fps better then bf4. Or it might just be Im using DX12

DX12? is it default on win 8.1? i know DX11 is

 

80-100+FPS Ultra on a 970. Windows 8.1. Game runs smooth no stutters or massive drops. BFH graphics are not as good as BF4 as BFH is reskined BF3. Everyone should have better performance on this game over BF4

BFH runs on Frostbite 2?

i have crappy performance ,less than on BF4 , GTX 770 GIGABYTE, i5 4690K 4.4ghz, Win 8.1 (avg: 62, max: 71,min: 30, a lot lower than in BF4)

 

drops down to 30 when the sandstorm comes in (BFH dust bowl CQ large,NOT GULF OF OMAN BF4)

[Columbo]

I don't have any performance problem, running at 1080p 144Hz, ultra settings (I had to turn off HBAO), it never goes under 70fps

Turn off MSAA as well. I use SSAO on Hardline with no MSAA. Ultra everything else. 

[R_Golden]

Lol ok It seems like Im to only one who likes red and black...

 

Ouch. Seeing in chat comments, people were getting a LOT less fps on a 970 (Not cause of VRM its still under 3 gigs) then my 290x. Maybe they are only optimizing for AMD?

I get between 80-100 FPS ultra 4x MSAA with 115% resolution scale O_O

[PerfectTemplar]

Lol ok It seems like Im to only one who likes red and black...

 

Ouch. Seeing in chat comments, people were getting a LOT less fps on a 970 (Not cause of VRM its still under 3 gigs) then my 290x. Maybe they are only optimizing for AMD?

Ultra with 4x MSAA 1080p I get min 80fps and max around 120fps.

[Snickerzz]

im mostly at 80fps with ultra 1080p with my 970.. do you have the latest driver?

[APrettyCoolWalrus]

im mostly at 80fps with ultra 1080p with my 970.. do you have the latest driver?

yeah I should...347.25