LTT 3DMark Thread

[done12many2]

Just now, Dark said:

I wouldn't doubt it, but max turbo is 3.3ghz (usually see 2.9-3.1 across multiple cores).  It would get a good score jump if it were in the 3.5ghz+ range.

 

No doubt with that many cores!

[Dark]

So low! 

Spent a few minutes raising the clocks with little success.  Rather then get them to a point where the fans are screaming and the temps are high, I am just going to wait until my water loop arrives.  Maybe then I'll have cooler cards and the same low score 

 

CPU: E5-2695v3

GPU: 2x Titan X (Pascal)

--Core(fs): 1,848 Mhz

--Mem(fs): 1,251 Mhz

 

Firestrike(23979): http://www.3dmark.com/fs/10659991 24961 - http://www.3dmark.com/3dm/15816566?

Time Spy(14325): http://www.3dmark.com/spy/672776

 

[done12many2]

20 minutes ago, Dark said:

So low! 

Spent a few minutes raising the clocks with little success.  Rather then get them to a point where the fans are screaming and the temps are high, I am just going to wait until my water loop arrives.  Maybe then I'll have cooler cards and the same low score 

 

CPU: E5-2695v3

GPU: 2x Titan X (Pascal)

--Core(fs): 1,848 Mhz

--Mem(fs): 1,251 Mhz

 

Firestrike(23979): http://www.3dmark.com/fs/10659991

Time Spy(14325): http://www.3dmark.com/spy/672776

 

Yeah, definitely get a custom loop on that beast.  You can't have pesky 8 and 10 core HWE and BWE chips outscoring you.  

 

What's the rig for?  Interesting choice on CPU/GPUs.

[Dark]

1 minute ago, done12many2 said:

 

Yeah, definitely get a custom loop on that beast.  You can't have pesky 8 and 10 core HWE and BWE chips outscoring you.  

 

What's the rig for?  Interesting choice on CPU/GPUs.

 

The 8 and 10 core upper tier consumer chips will eat this one on most benchmarks that aren't thread heavy, it just doesn't have the clock power.

 

About a year ago I was using this rig to run a mock environment of systems at the office that I could push patches/changes to.  I have since migrated that to a couple of Dell servers (R320, R730xd) so now this one is completely under utilized.  It would be nice to swap in a consumer chip but I don't think I'd notice much outside of benchmarks.

[done12many2]

4 minutes ago, Dark said:

 

The 8 and 10 core upper tier consumer chips will eat this one on most benchmarks that aren't thread heavy, it just doesn't have the clock power.

 

About a year ago I was using this rig to run a mock environment of systems at the office that I could push patches/changes to.  I have since migrated that to a couple of Dell servers (R320, R730xd) so now this one is completely under utilized.  It would be nice to swap in a consumer chip but I don't think I'd notice much outside of benchmarks.

 

You'd be surprised how much clock speed comes in to play with some games and daily usage.  I run 4 of my cores at 4.9 with a per core overclock just because it makes things really snappy.  As core count utilization increases, clock speed automatically drops to a final 4.6 on all 8.  I notice a huge difference compared to running at the default 3.0 / 3.5 speeds.

 

If you don't need that many cores anymore, maybe you can sell the chip and roll that into an Extreme Edition chip?

[Dark]

6 minutes ago, done12many2 said:

 

You'd be surprised how much clock speed comes in to play with some games and daily usage.  I run 4 of my cores at 4.9 with a per core overclock just because it makes things really snappy.  As core count utilization increases, clock speed automatically drops to a final 4.6 on all 8.  I notice a huge difference compared to running at the default 3.0 / 3.5 speeds.

 

If you don't need that many cores anymore, maybe you can sell the chip and roll that into an Extreme Edition chip?

Definitely something to think about. 

[Techicolors]

So 3DMark released VRMark today, which is VR benchmarking but without the headset so it's done on your display. 

 

http://www.guru3d.com/files-details/futuremark-vrmark-download.html

[DXMember]

22 hours ago, Technicolors said:

So 3DMark released VRMark today, which is VR benchmarking but without the headset so it's done on your display. 

 

http://www.guru3d.com/files-details/futuremark-vrmark-download.html

they had demo of it for a while, guess it should be included with the advanced edition?

awww... they released as a separate product...

[Vellinious]

I bought it on Steam for 9.99...played with it a little bit last night.  Apparently my rig isn't good enough for the "blue room" benchmark.  lol

[DXMember]

25 minutes ago, Vellinious said:

I bought it on Steam for 9.99...played with it a little bit last night.  Apparently my rig isn't good enough for the "blue room" benchmark.  lol

 

Reality-Check

Suddenly this doesn't feel as sarcastic, does it?

[Vellinious]

23 minutes ago, DXMember said:

 

Reality-Check

Suddenly this doesn't feel as sarcastic, does it?

I don't have time to listen to over an hour of 40 year old guys in mommy's basement bitching about stuff....is there a TLDR version?

[DXMember]

10 hours ago, Vellinious said:

I don't have time to listen to over an hour of 40 year old guys in mommy's basement bitching about stuff....is there a TLDR version?

.... the link is timestamped you click it and listen for 15 seconds for a good laugh

[Vellinious]

1 hour ago, DXMember said:

.... the link is timestamped you click it and listen for 15 seconds for a good laugh

I'll take a listen tomorrow.  

[done12many2]

18 hours ago, Vellinious said:

Apparently my rig isn't good enough for the "blue room" benchmark.  lol

 

What happened to the Titan XP that you had?  I thought that you were doing an XP SLI?

[Vellinious]

1 hour ago, done12many2 said:

 

What happened to the Titan XP that you had?  I thought that you were doing an XP SLI?

Was going to.  I didn't like the Titan.  As powerful as it was, it just seemed so fragile....it took all the fun of overclocking away.  I'm not the kind of guy that's going to hardware mod a $1200 GPU to avoid a power limit that should have been set higher from the factory, and with the likelihood that we're just not going to get a pascal bios editor....a GPU that wouldn't be bashing it's head against the power limit every time I add 100mhz to the core, seemed like a much better idea.  lol

I sold it to a buddy of mine and kept the 1080 FTWs, instead.  Was a fun experiment, but....not my thing.

[Vellinious]

Lowered the ambient 5c today and pushed the GPUs for a while.  Might try to go 10c lower next weekend and see if I can extend it out a bit more.

 

CPU: Intel Core i7-6950X @ 4.3
GPU: 2 x GTX 1080 FTW 
GPU Core: 2202
GPU Memory: 5556

Score: 15769

http://www.3dmark.com/spy/688549

[DildorTheDecent]

2 minutes ago, Vellinious said:

GPU Core: 2202

[Festive]

https://gyazo.com/9b1913cf29316c78b1c41a05941d47e1

[DildorTheDecent]

7 hours ago, Festive said:

https://gyazo.com/9b1913cf29316c78b1c41a05941d47e1

use the template

 

Benchmark: (Fire Strike, Fire Strike Extreme, Sky Diver)
CPU: 
GPU:
GPU Core:
GPU Memory:
Score:
3DMark Link:

[Vellinious]

CPU: Intel Core i7-6950X @ 4.4
GPU: GTX 1080 FTW 
GPU Core: 2189
GPU Memory: 5567

Score: 8867

http://www.3dmark.com/spy/699181

[Dark]

With the new water loop and some overclocking...

 

CPU: E5-2695v3 (stock)

GPU: 2x Titan X (Pascal)

--Core(fs): 2,076 Mhz

--Mem(fs): 5,602 Mhz

 

Time Spy (15,710): http://www.3dmark.com/spy/714187

----Graphics: 17,965  ----CPU: 9,182

[Intelfreak]

I got a better score since my last post and also ran a time spy.

 

Benchmark: Fire strike and time spy

CPU: I7 920 OC to 4,4 GHz

GPU: Zotac GTX 970 sli

GPU: BASE 1316 MHz boost 1456 MHz (for time spy clocks is lower cause of heat).

Memory: 7676 MHz

 

http://www.3dmark.com/fs/9319378

http://www.3dmark.com/spy/673209

[Morgan MLGman]

Benchmark: (Fire Strike)
CPU: i7-6700K (14 671)
GPU: Sapphire Radeon R9 Fury Nitro (17 218)
GPU Core: 1160
GPU Memory: 550

Score: 14 758
3DMark Link: http://www.3dmark.com/3dm/16182840?

 

Full specifications in the sig

[Jumper118]

Firestrike

i5 2500K@5.2ghz

XFX RX480

1500

2250

12528

http://www.3dmark.com/3dm/16211574

 

that is probably the least valid submission ever  

[crowy]

Pre Upgrade
Benchmarks: Sky Diver/Time Spy/Fire Strike/VR Orange/VR Blue
CPU: i7 920
GPU: GTX 980 Ti
GPU Core: Stock
GPU Memory: Stock

Sky Diver Score: 18 450

Time Spy Score: 4 463

Fire Strike Score: 10 151
Sky Diver 3DMark Link:http://www.3dmark.com/3dm/16241733

Time Spy 3DMark Link: http://www.3dmark.com/3dm/16242091

Fire Strike 3DMark Link: http://www.3dmark.com/3dm/16242655

 

VR Orange Score: 4 766

VR Blue Score: 1 860
VR Orange Link: http://www.3dmark.com/vrm/16242764

VR Blue Link: http://www.3dmark.com/vrm/16242811