Theoretical design

[TatamiMatt]

2 hours ago, Blue4130 said:

Nobody is claiming that it isn't a real product. BUT it doesn't make water "wetter". All it does is reduce surface tension.

Tbf i do think that would actually make water *feel* wetter at least

[BringBackBlinkCode]

5 hours ago, Blue4130 said:

Nobody is claiming that it isn't a real product. BUT it doesn't make water "wetter". All it does is reduce surface tension.

it says on the bottle , it makes the water, wetter

[BringBackBlinkCode]

3 hours ago, TatamiMatt said:

Tbf i do think that would actually make water *feel* wetter at least

yah it does some surface tension trick , basically water striders would be flucked

[Blue4130]

1 hour ago, BringBackBlinkCode said:

it says on the bottle , it makes the water, wetter

That is marketing, not a real thing.

[BringBackBlinkCode]

you're not my dad.

[thrasher_565]

On 2/23/2025 at 10:20 PM, LogicalDrm said:

If this is meant as experiment for school/uni, go for it. If not, you can make calculations for it on theoretical level to prove it wrong. The amount of energy required to get water above turbine is always greater than what turbine can generate.

there is a free energy pump that pushes water higher. ya its slow but it can be scaled up.

[whispous]

2 hours ago, thrasher_565 said:

there is a free energy pump that pushes water higher. ya its slow but it can be scaled up.

That's not true, at any level.

[Blue4130]

4 hours ago, thrasher_565 said:

there is a free energy pump that pushes water higher. ya its slow but it can be scaled up.

No there isn't.

[thrasher_565]

On 3/2/2025 at 11:06 AM, whispous said:

That's not true, at any level.

 

On 3/2/2025 at 1:46 PM, Blue4130 said:

No there isn't.

papa pump is another but you buy it other you can build it.

 

Edited March 4, 2025 by thrasher_565

[Blue4130]

2 hours ago, thrasher_565 said:

 

papa pump is another but you buy it other you can build it.

 

None of those videos show more energy being output than is put in. Because it not possible. The first person that can do that would single handedly solve the energy crisis.

[thrasher_565]

3 minutes ago, Blue4130 said:

None of those videos show more energy being output than is put in. Because it not possible. The first person that can do that would single handedly solve the energy crisis.

we solved it we just dont build it. i was solved in like the 70's...

its oil or die...

 

there been off grid for a long time...but you dont need to build off grid thow

Edited March 4, 2025 by thrasher_565

[Blue4130]

1 minute ago, thrasher_565 said:

we solved it we just dont build it. i was solved in like the 70's...

its oil or die...

 

there been off grid for a long time...but you dont need to build off grid thow

No it wasn't. None of those provide more energy that is put in... You can't get free energy.

[whispous]

7 hours ago, thrasher_565 said:

we solved it we just dont build it. i was solved in like the 70's...

its oil or die...

 

there been off grid for a long time...but you dont need to build off grid thow

You have been taken in by an illogical conspiracy theory. This is not possible with the laws of physics.

 

There is no free energy. You are wrong, you must stop imagining this is real.

 

You seeing a youtube video is not a good way to build a belief system.

[OddOod]

8 hours ago, thrasher_565 said:

we solved it we just dont build it. i was solved in like the 70's...

its oil or die...

 

there been off grid for a long time...but you dont need to build off grid thow

[BringBackBlinkCode]

geo thermal pumps are finite resources, they found that out, as it eventually uses up the geo thermal and cools the geo to the point it stops thermaling. energy recouperation is a thing, and a noble goal, but you can't break the laws of physics, unless you can, if you can, stfu and get your noble prize3