BATTLEFIELD 4 supersampling

[DildorTheDecent]

Honestly the game looks even prettier when you use 200% Supersampling which makes the resolution effectively 4K (assuming you're native is 1080p).

Had to put the game at low settings, no AA for obvious reasons.

Should probably invest in 3-4GB cards...

[rambi36]

If only I had a GTX 780...

[bamerx98]

If only I had a GTX 780...

Still runs like poop saddly even on 290 its not very good (Friend 1 has 780, friend 2 has 290)

[Assassin]

Super Sampling lol thats like running SSAA.My 2GB GTX 770 will weep at that setting lol

[Fred Castellum]

I'll just be owning people up with my GTX 460 running the game at lowest possible settings....

 

http://battlelog.battlefield.com/bf4/soldier/Mobius_Squadron/stats/414694198/pc/

[jbr]

Will it help me spot those invisible players that keep killing me?

 

http://battlelog.battlefield.com/bf4/forum/search/?p=0&sort=score&q=invisible+players&byuser=&timerange=30&section=bf4&language=

[TheNinjaNextDor]

I've tried it and got 20FPS with it all the way up. That was at 1080P though.

[SkilledRebuilds]

x1.5 is still pretty good eye candy and can still give semi acceptable fps.

[Tr3vor]

Honestly the game looks even prettier when you use 200% Supersampling which makes the resolution effectively 4K (assuming you're native is 1080p).

Had to put the game at low settings, no AA for obvious reasons.

Should probably invest in 3-4GB cards...

 

what was your framerate like when you did that?

[LOST TALE]

If only this game had the MSAA efficiency of BF3.

 

BF3 had no grpahic flickering. that thing was praticly SSAA. the polls 2KM away ( litteraly ) would be AAed. on 4 MSAA.

when u got that, aint nobody notice SSAA

[DildorTheDecent]

what was your framerate like when you did that?

Well on 1080p at the highest possible settings, 70 to about 90FPS was achieved with GTX 660 SLi.

With supersampling at 200% along with lowest possible settings 40-60 FPS was achieved with that same GTX 660 SLi.

Both cards aren't overclocked because BF4 dislikes it, CPU is however.

Would recommend running at 1.5-2.0x supersampling at maybe low to medium settings.

Any recommendations for 3-4GB cards?

[totjup5]

Still runs like poop saddly even on 290 its not very good (Friend 1 has 780, friend 2 has 290)

It runs at like 20 fps at 200% on my 2 3gb 660tis (that's at 1440p though)

[schwat]

In BF4 the highest I can go before starting to lose fps with my GTX 770 SLI setup is 140%. Still looks way better than 100% & still getting 100-144 fps with mostly Ultra settings. 

 

Have any of yall tried SGSSAA in other games? Some of the ones I've found it works particularly well in are Borderlands 2 & Warframe. It's something to look into if you have an SLI setup or a very powerful gpu & are at ~50% gpu usage or less in a game. 

 

Here's a thread that has a list of all the compatibility bits you need to set up SGSSAA using nVidia inspector. http://forums.guru3d.com/showthread.php?t=357956

 

Edit: Here's a good comparison showing in game FXAA vs SGSSAA in warframe. Pay attention to the enhanced detail especially in the distance. Ignore the color change, that's just part of Warframe not an effect of the SGSSAA. 

 

http://screenshotcomparison.com/comparison.php?id=64871

[Blue fellow]

How does supersampling make it look like 4k textures when you are lowering to the texture quality to low to run it? I was never fond of supersampling since it can cause blurring. If I want some form of awesome anti aliasing I'd rather downscale the game and run multisampling.

 

Could you do a screenshot comparison of your low supersampling settings verses your normal settings? And ultra supersampling verses ultra non-super sampling?

[Coconut Money Affiliates]

Bruddah I run on medium/high and at 200% supersampled.

[ACatWithThumbs]

I used Supersampling in Battlefield 3.
But in Battlefield 4 it takes to much VRAM

The GTX870/880 can't come soon enough...