Jump to content

Quick stupid RAM question [which is better ](Mhz vs CL)

Which is better?

DDR4

3000Mhz 18CL or 2666Mhz 16CL

CPU: Ryzen 3 1200

 

Edit: should I empty my pockets and go 3200Mhz 16 CL ?

 

edit2: Does buying faster Ram even matter, for example do you get more dps?

Note: Users receive notifications after Mentions & Quotes. 

Feel free to ask any questions regarding my comments/build lists. I know a lot about PCs but not everything.

PC:

Ryzen 5 5600 |16GB DDR4 3200Mhz | B450 | GTX 1080 ti

PCs I used before:

Pentium G4500 | 4GB/8GB DDR4 2133Mhz | H110 | GTX 1050

Ryzen 3 1200 3,5Ghz / OC:4Ghz | 8GB DDR4 2133Mhz / 16GB 3200Mhz | B450 | GTX 1050

Ryzen 3 1200 3,5Ghz | 16GB 3200Mhz | B450 | GTX 1080 ti

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, ragnarok0273 said:

3000 CL18 - it has a bit less latency and plus Ryzen prefers faster RAM

is it worth money going more expensive up to 3200Mhz 16CL or is the difference so small it has 0 reason, unless?

Note: Users receive notifications after Mentions & Quotes. 

Feel free to ask any questions regarding my comments/build lists. I know a lot about PCs but not everything.

PC:

Ryzen 5 5600 |16GB DDR4 3200Mhz | B450 | GTX 1080 ti

PCs I used before:

Pentium G4500 | 4GB/8GB DDR4 2133Mhz | H110 | GTX 1050

Ryzen 3 1200 3,5Ghz / OC:4Ghz | 8GB DDR4 2133Mhz / 16GB 3200Mhz | B450 | GTX 1050

Ryzen 3 1200 3,5Ghz | 16GB 3200Mhz | B450 | GTX 1080 ti

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just now, ragnarok0273 said:

3200 CL16 is better than 3000 CL18 by 2 nanoseconds.

And 2 nanoseconds is a decent amount.

does that translate to games though? also elephants

Note: Users receive notifications after Mentions & Quotes. 

Feel free to ask any questions regarding my comments/build lists. I know a lot about PCs but not everything.

PC:

Ryzen 5 5600 |16GB DDR4 3200Mhz | B450 | GTX 1080 ti

PCs I used before:

Pentium G4500 | 4GB/8GB DDR4 2133Mhz | H110 | GTX 1050

Ryzen 3 1200 3,5Ghz / OC:4Ghz | 8GB DDR4 2133Mhz / 16GB 3200Mhz | B450 | GTX 1050

Ryzen 3 1200 3,5Ghz | 16GB 3200Mhz | B450 | GTX 1080 ti

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

hello?

Note: Users receive notifications after Mentions & Quotes. 

Feel free to ask any questions regarding my comments/build lists. I know a lot about PCs but not everything.

PC:

Ryzen 5 5600 |16GB DDR4 3200Mhz | B450 | GTX 1080 ti

PCs I used before:

Pentium G4500 | 4GB/8GB DDR4 2133Mhz | H110 | GTX 1050

Ryzen 3 1200 3,5Ghz / OC:4Ghz | 8GB DDR4 2133Mhz / 16GB 3200Mhz | B450 | GTX 1050

Ryzen 3 1200 3,5Ghz | 16GB 3200Mhz | B450 | GTX 1080 ti

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

12 hours ago, ragnarok0273 said:

3200 CL16 is better than 3000 CL18 by 2 nanoseconds.

And 2 nanoseconds is a decent amount.

RAM isn't that simple.

8700K @ 5.2ghz 1.29V, 4x8 Rev.E @ 4040 13-20-20-39 1.7V.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just now, alatron978 said:

RAM isn't that simple.

I know that.

But I'm not looking to explain the exact details of how each one is better than another.

elephants

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

13 hours ago, podkall said:

Which is better?

DDR4

3000Mhz 18CL or 2666Mhz 16CL

CPU: Ryzen 3 1200

 

Edit: should I empty my pockets and go 3200Mhz 16 CL ?

 

edit2: Does buying faster Ram even matter, for example do you get more dps?

A mixture of both frequency and timings are very important though which kit is better can't be determined by the information you have given. CAS latency and the frequency isn't the only factor, the only primary timings have a massive performance impact as well. Most noticeably tRCD, which is the 2nd timing you will usually see which has a larger impact on performance then CAS latency does.
Regarding faster ram making an impact this graph shows the impact it can have. This was using a 10900K though, so a ryzen system will scale even more with frequency whilst FCLK, UCLK and MCLK are 1:1:1.
unknown.png
 

8700K @ 5.2ghz 1.29V, 4x8 Rev.E @ 4040 13-20-20-39 1.7V.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, alatron978 said:

A mixture of both frequency and timings are very important though which kit is better can't be determined by the information you have given. CAS latency and the frequency isn't the only factor, the only primary timings have a massive performance impact as well. Most noticeably tRCD, which is the 2nd timing you will usually see which has a larger impact on performance then CAS latency does.
Regarding faster ram making an impact this graph shows the impact it can have. This was using a 10900K though, so a ryzen system will scale even more with frequency whilst FCLK, UCLK and MCLK are 1:1:1.
unknown.png
 

holy, anyway I figured it's whatever I buy it will be faster than my previous ram and obviously larger so.... simple cheap and effective, but thx for the detail I knew other timings existed but never knew how detremental they can be

Note: Users receive notifications after Mentions & Quotes. 

Feel free to ask any questions regarding my comments/build lists. I know a lot about PCs but not everything.

PC:

Ryzen 5 5600 |16GB DDR4 3200Mhz | B450 | GTX 1080 ti

PCs I used before:

Pentium G4500 | 4GB/8GB DDR4 2133Mhz | H110 | GTX 1050

Ryzen 3 1200 3,5Ghz / OC:4Ghz | 8GB DDR4 2133Mhz / 16GB 3200Mhz | B450 | GTX 1050

Ryzen 3 1200 3,5Ghz | 16GB 3200Mhz | B450 | GTX 1080 ti

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

×