Jump to content

What Is The Best Graphics Card By Nvidia

RickHasRolledYou

RTX A6000

NEW PC build: Blank Heaven   minimalist white and black PC     Old S340 build log "White Heaven"        The "LIGHTCANON" flashlight build log        Project AntiRoll (prototype)        Custom speaker project

Spoiler

Ryzen 3950X | AMD Vega Frontier Edition | ASUS X570 Pro WS | Corsair Vengeance LPX 64GB | NZXT H500 | Seasonic Prime Fanless TX-700 | Custom loop | Coolermaster SK630 White | Logitech MX Master 2S | Samsung 980 Pro 1TB + 970 Pro 512GB | Samsung 58" 4k TV | Scarlett 2i4 | 2x AT2020

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, jaslion said:

Gt 710

I had one of those and yeah it was awesome but my money is on the GTX 1050 Ti, best bang for the buck I ever had.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just now, Chris Fortune said:

I had one of those and yeah it was awesome but my money is on the GTX 1050 Ti, best bang for the buck I ever had.

Mine was a joke btw. This question is so vague and really can have many answers depending on what the user wants it to do

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Obviously its the GT1010.. since its the only card we can buy.. according to Nvidia as its the answer to all our GPU shortages!!!

Community Standards | Fan Control Software

Please make sure to Quote me or @ me to see your reply!

Just because I am a Moderator does not mean I am always right. Please fact check me and verify my answer. 

 

"Black Out"

Ryzen 9 5900x | Full Custom Water Loop | Asus Crosshair VIII Hero (Wi-Fi) | RTX 3090 Founders | Ballistix 32gb 16-18-18-36 3600mhz 

1tb Samsung 970 Evo | 2x 2tb Crucial MX500 SSD | Fractal Design Meshify S2 | Corsair HX1200 PSU

 

Dedicated Streaming Rig

 Ryzen 7 3700x | Asus B450-F Strix | 16gb Gskill Flare X 3200mhz | Corsair RM550x PSU | Asus Strix GTX1070 | 250gb 860 Evo m.2

Phanteks P300A |  Elgato HD60 Pro | Avermedia Live Gamer Duo | Avermedia 4k GC573 Capture Card

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just now, jaslion said:

Mine was a joke btw. This question is so vague and really can have many answers depending on what the user wants it to do

I did realise that but also saw some truth in it too, at the time it was a top card. I am running an RTX 3090 at the mo and money no object I would have to say that is it, bang for the buck I would say a 3080 FE if you can get one at MSRP

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Chris Fortune said:

I did realise that but also saw some truth in it too, at the time it was a top card. I am running an RTX 3090 at the mo and money no object I would have to say that is it, bang for the buck I would say a 3080 FE if you can get one at MSRP

It was never a top card. It's always been a terrible gaming card :p.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just now, jaslion said:

It was never a top card. It's always been a terrible gaming card :p.

It worked really well for me and was able to run games that "required" a higher specced card, personal experience and anecdotal to be sure but that was what I based my comment on

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just now, Chris Fortune said:

It worked really well for me and was able to run games that "required" a higher specced card, personal experience and anecdotal to be sure but that was what I based my comment on

You can get most stuff to run on the lowest of hardware if you go low enough :p.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, jaslion said:

You can get most stuff to run on the lowest of hardware if you go low enough :p.

Run at playable rates, true it wasn't maxed out or even close but according to the developer it shouldn't have even managed. To me that's a win and sure I upgraded as soon as I could but it worked well enough for me for about 6 months

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, Chris Fortune said:

I did realise that but also saw some truth in it too, at the time it was a top card. 

The GT 710? That was literally never a top card. It was designed to be a very low end card intentionally. 

Main System: Phobos

AMD Ryzen 7 2700 (8C/16T), ASRock B450 Steel Legend, 16GB G.SKILL Aegis DDR4 3000MHz, AMD Radeon RX 570 4GB (XFX), 960GB Crucial M500, 2TB Seagate BarraCuda, Windows 10 Pro for Workstations/macOS Catalina

 

Secondary System: York

Intel Core i7-2600 (4C/8T), ASUS P8Z68-V/GEN3, 16GB GEIL Enhance Corsa DDR3 1600MHz, Zotac GeForce GTX 550 Ti 1GB, 240GB ADATA Ultimate SU650, Windows 10 Pro for Workstations

 

Older File Server: Yet to be named

Intel Pentium 4 HT (1C/2T), Intel D865GBF, 3GB DDR 400MHz, ATI Radeon HD 4650 1GB (HIS), 80GB WD Caviar, 320GB Hitachi Deskstar, Windows XP Pro SP3, Windows Server 2003 R2

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just now, ProjectBox153 said:

The GT 710? That was literally never a top card. It was designed to be a very low end card intentionally. 

IT worked for me at a time where performance was secondary to cost, also it went well past what it was "supposed" to achieve in the games I played at the time so for me that's a good card.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Chris Fortune said:

IT worked for me at a time where performance was secondary to cost, also it went well past what it was "supposed" to achieve in the games I played at the time so for me that's a good card.

Sure, it might have been a good card for some things, but there's no denying that it performs terribly compared to anything higher. It was made to literally add display outputs to a computer, essentially. 

Main System: Phobos

AMD Ryzen 7 2700 (8C/16T), ASRock B450 Steel Legend, 16GB G.SKILL Aegis DDR4 3000MHz, AMD Radeon RX 570 4GB (XFX), 960GB Crucial M500, 2TB Seagate BarraCuda, Windows 10 Pro for Workstations/macOS Catalina

 

Secondary System: York

Intel Core i7-2600 (4C/8T), ASUS P8Z68-V/GEN3, 16GB GEIL Enhance Corsa DDR3 1600MHz, Zotac GeForce GTX 550 Ti 1GB, 240GB ADATA Ultimate SU650, Windows 10 Pro for Workstations

 

Older File Server: Yet to be named

Intel Pentium 4 HT (1C/2T), Intel D865GBF, 3GB DDR 400MHz, ATI Radeon HD 4650 1GB (HIS), 80GB WD Caviar, 320GB Hitachi Deskstar, Windows XP Pro SP3, Windows Server 2003 R2

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, ProjectBox153 said:

Sure, it might have been a good card for some things, but there's no denying that it performs terribly compared to anything higher. It was made to literally add display outputs to a computer, essentially. 

As I said I upgraded ASAP but why I remember it was that it worked far better than I expected it too rather than its actual performance level. TBH I think I still have it in my box of junk hardware as an if all else fails card.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Quatro RTX8000 of course. works great at the office and has just enough VRAM for 8k 240hz 🤣

The best gaming PC is the PC you like to game on, how you like to game on it

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Alltime the Geforce 4 Ti 4200 was a beast, and the 8800GT was also brilliant. Both gave Performance only like 30-40% off the fastest card for <£200.  Today I would Say either the 3060Ti or 3060 would be the best card for value if they actually existed outside a Youtuber's studio!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

×