Jump to content

Correct me:Does Nvidia Freestyle Sharpening improves Quality?

Mr.Stork
Go to solution Solved by Boby,

Captain here. The image sharpening feature is meant to be used in games that have internal scaling rendering option like AC Oddessey, so the game runs at native resolution like 1080p but the assets are rendered internally at 900p. And then if you apply sharpening, it's almost indestiguishable from native. However if you change your actual monitor resolution, to anything but native, no amount of sharpening will fix the crap. 

Specs: http://specr.me/show/8ee

I was playing Assassin's Creed Syndicate on 1920x1080p monitor, and thought of downscaling to 1600x900, and turned on Sharpening in Nvidia Overlay, it seemed worse that native 1080p. And the sharpening dosen't look too good either. Am I doing something wrong? I watched the Hardware Unboxed's video about that and they did it with 4k and it seemed good, so was it applied on 4k or to reach close to 4k?

So, do I apply on 1080p on 1080p monitor?, Unless the performance impact is far worse than how better it makes the games look..

 

Thanks.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm not surprised it looks worse. 1600x900 just doesn't fit nicely into a 1920x1080 grid. It's a factor of 1.2 difference on each side. In the video (can't watch it now), did they by chance scale down from 4k to 1080p or something, i.e. a nice round factor of 4?  Because then it can be scaled well, since now effectively 4 pixels become 1.

7 minutes ago, Mr.Stork said:

So, do I apply on 1080p on 1080p monitor?

Ideally yes. This goes for any resolution, that stuff will look best at its native resolution, as that's what it was designed to display. It's performance impact depends entirely on what components you have in your PC and the game settings.

Crystal: CPU: i7 7700K | Motherboard: Asus ROG Strix Z270F | RAM: GSkill 16 GB@3200MHz | GPU: Nvidia GTX 1080 Ti FE | Case: Corsair Crystal 570X (black) | PSU: EVGA Supernova G2 1000W | Monitor: Asus VG248QE 24"

Laptop: Dell XPS 13 9370 | CPU: i5 10510U | RAM: 16 GB

Server: CPU: i5 4690k | RAM: 16 GB | Case: Corsair Graphite 760T White | Storage: 19 TB

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Mr.Stork said:

 

It's because the sharpening in Nvidia is poop for now. They say it in the video too ;) 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

maybe because 900p is too much for it? Freestyle sharpening just isnt as good as Radeon Sharpening, even though it's still better than playing at the same reduced render res without sharpening

CPU: i7-2600K 4751MHz 1.44V (software) --> 1.47V at the back of the socket Motherboard: Asrock Z77 Extreme4 (BCLK: 103.3MHz) CPU Cooler: Noctua NH-D15 RAM: Adata XPG 2x8GB DDR3 (XMP: 2133MHz 10-11-11-30 CR2, custom: 2203MHz 10-11-10-26 CR1 tRFC:230 tREFI:14000) GPU: Asus GTX 1070 Dual (Super Jetstream vbios, +70(2025-2088MHz)/+400(8.8Gbps)) SSD: Samsung 840 Pro 256GB (main boot drive), Transcend SSD370 128GB PSU: Seasonic X-660 80+ Gold Case: Antec P110 Silent, 5 intakes 1 exhaust Monitor: AOC G2460PF 1080p 144Hz (150Hz max w/ DP, 121Hz max w/ HDMI) TN panel Keyboard: Logitech G610 Orion (Cherry MX Blue) with SteelSeries Apex M260 keycaps Mouse: BenQ Zowie FK1

 

Model: HP Omen 17 17-an110ca CPU: i7-8750H (0.125V core & cache, 50mV SA undervolt) GPU: GTX 1060 6GB Mobile (+80/+450, 1650MHz~1750MHz 0.78V~0.85V) RAM: 8+8GB DDR4-2400 18-17-17-39 2T Storage: HP EX920 1TB PCIe x4 M.2 SSD + Crucial MX500 1TB 2.5" SATA SSD, 128GB Toshiba PCIe x2 M.2 SSD (KBG30ZMV128G) gone cooking externally, 1TB Seagate 7200RPM 2.5" HDD (ST1000LM049-2GH172) left outside Monitor: 1080p 126Hz IPS G-sync

 

Desktop benching:

Cinebench R15 Single thread:168 Multi-thread: 833 

SuperPi (v1.5 from Techpowerup, PI value output) 16K: 0.100s 1M: 8.255s 32M: 7m 45.93s

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

30 minutes ago, tikker said:

did they by chance scale down from 4k to 1080p or something

Not to 1080p but downscaled, as I understood, they used it on native also dlss to reach 4k. They mentioned "near 4k" many times, so I would assume it's downscaled.

Here's 2 images:image.thumb.png.3749a8d9a20f95303383423517a67e45.png

Untitled-1.pngLast image /\ has a line from the middle

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Jurrunio said:

Freestyle sharpening just isnt as good as Radeon Sharpening

Thats the thing, it is very very similar, if not better! see the video or the image I posted above in the reply (from the video)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, Mr.Stork said:

Thats the thing, it is very very similar, if not better! see the video or the image I posted above in the reply (from the video)

To me Freestyle looks a bit less clear, with actual cards on the same monitor. 

CPU: i7-2600K 4751MHz 1.44V (software) --> 1.47V at the back of the socket Motherboard: Asrock Z77 Extreme4 (BCLK: 103.3MHz) CPU Cooler: Noctua NH-D15 RAM: Adata XPG 2x8GB DDR3 (XMP: 2133MHz 10-11-11-30 CR2, custom: 2203MHz 10-11-10-26 CR1 tRFC:230 tREFI:14000) GPU: Asus GTX 1070 Dual (Super Jetstream vbios, +70(2025-2088MHz)/+400(8.8Gbps)) SSD: Samsung 840 Pro 256GB (main boot drive), Transcend SSD370 128GB PSU: Seasonic X-660 80+ Gold Case: Antec P110 Silent, 5 intakes 1 exhaust Monitor: AOC G2460PF 1080p 144Hz (150Hz max w/ DP, 121Hz max w/ HDMI) TN panel Keyboard: Logitech G610 Orion (Cherry MX Blue) with SteelSeries Apex M260 keycaps Mouse: BenQ Zowie FK1

 

Model: HP Omen 17 17-an110ca CPU: i7-8750H (0.125V core & cache, 50mV SA undervolt) GPU: GTX 1060 6GB Mobile (+80/+450, 1650MHz~1750MHz 0.78V~0.85V) RAM: 8+8GB DDR4-2400 18-17-17-39 2T Storage: HP EX920 1TB PCIe x4 M.2 SSD + Crucial MX500 1TB 2.5" SATA SSD, 128GB Toshiba PCIe x2 M.2 SSD (KBG30ZMV128G) gone cooking externally, 1TB Seagate 7200RPM 2.5" HDD (ST1000LM049-2GH172) left outside Monitor: 1080p 126Hz IPS G-sync

 

Desktop benching:

Cinebench R15 Single thread:168 Multi-thread: 833 

SuperPi (v1.5 from Techpowerup, PI value output) 16K: 0.100s 1M: 8.255s 32M: 7m 45.93s

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Jurrunio said:

To me Freestyle looks a bit less clear, with actual cards on the same monitor.

But does both Freestyle and amd variant of sharpening increase perf? I mean why should i use it??

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Mr.Stork said:

But does both Freestyle and amd variant of sharpening increase perf? I mean why should i use it??

you use it to compensate for quality loss and benefit from performance increase by rendering at a lower native resolution.

CPU: i7-2600K 4751MHz 1.44V (software) --> 1.47V at the back of the socket Motherboard: Asrock Z77 Extreme4 (BCLK: 103.3MHz) CPU Cooler: Noctua NH-D15 RAM: Adata XPG 2x8GB DDR3 (XMP: 2133MHz 10-11-11-30 CR2, custom: 2203MHz 10-11-10-26 CR1 tRFC:230 tREFI:14000) GPU: Asus GTX 1070 Dual (Super Jetstream vbios, +70(2025-2088MHz)/+400(8.8Gbps)) SSD: Samsung 840 Pro 256GB (main boot drive), Transcend SSD370 128GB PSU: Seasonic X-660 80+ Gold Case: Antec P110 Silent, 5 intakes 1 exhaust Monitor: AOC G2460PF 1080p 144Hz (150Hz max w/ DP, 121Hz max w/ HDMI) TN panel Keyboard: Logitech G610 Orion (Cherry MX Blue) with SteelSeries Apex M260 keycaps Mouse: BenQ Zowie FK1

 

Model: HP Omen 17 17-an110ca CPU: i7-8750H (0.125V core & cache, 50mV SA undervolt) GPU: GTX 1060 6GB Mobile (+80/+450, 1650MHz~1750MHz 0.78V~0.85V) RAM: 8+8GB DDR4-2400 18-17-17-39 2T Storage: HP EX920 1TB PCIe x4 M.2 SSD + Crucial MX500 1TB 2.5" SATA SSD, 128GB Toshiba PCIe x2 M.2 SSD (KBG30ZMV128G) gone cooking externally, 1TB Seagate 7200RPM 2.5" HDD (ST1000LM049-2GH172) left outside Monitor: 1080p 126Hz IPS G-sync

 

Desktop benching:

Cinebench R15 Single thread:168 Multi-thread: 833 

SuperPi (v1.5 from Techpowerup, PI value output) 16K: 0.100s 1M: 8.255s 32M: 7m 45.93s

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

15 hours ago, Jurrunio said:

lower native resolution.

What does "lower native res" mean? U mean Lower than native res? or like 1080p on a 4k monitor?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Mr.Stork said:

What does "lower native res" mean? U mean Lower than native res? or like 1080p on a 4k monitor?

not nearly as extreme but yes you're right

CPU: i7-2600K 4751MHz 1.44V (software) --> 1.47V at the back of the socket Motherboard: Asrock Z77 Extreme4 (BCLK: 103.3MHz) CPU Cooler: Noctua NH-D15 RAM: Adata XPG 2x8GB DDR3 (XMP: 2133MHz 10-11-11-30 CR2, custom: 2203MHz 10-11-10-26 CR1 tRFC:230 tREFI:14000) GPU: Asus GTX 1070 Dual (Super Jetstream vbios, +70(2025-2088MHz)/+400(8.8Gbps)) SSD: Samsung 840 Pro 256GB (main boot drive), Transcend SSD370 128GB PSU: Seasonic X-660 80+ Gold Case: Antec P110 Silent, 5 intakes 1 exhaust Monitor: AOC G2460PF 1080p 144Hz (150Hz max w/ DP, 121Hz max w/ HDMI) TN panel Keyboard: Logitech G610 Orion (Cherry MX Blue) with SteelSeries Apex M260 keycaps Mouse: BenQ Zowie FK1

 

Model: HP Omen 17 17-an110ca CPU: i7-8750H (0.125V core & cache, 50mV SA undervolt) GPU: GTX 1060 6GB Mobile (+80/+450, 1650MHz~1750MHz 0.78V~0.85V) RAM: 8+8GB DDR4-2400 18-17-17-39 2T Storage: HP EX920 1TB PCIe x4 M.2 SSD + Crucial MX500 1TB 2.5" SATA SSD, 128GB Toshiba PCIe x2 M.2 SSD (KBG30ZMV128G) gone cooking externally, 1TB Seagate 7200RPM 2.5" HDD (ST1000LM049-2GH172) left outside Monitor: 1080p 126Hz IPS G-sync

 

Desktop benching:

Cinebench R15 Single thread:168 Multi-thread: 833 

SuperPi (v1.5 from Techpowerup, PI value output) 16K: 0.100s 1M: 8.255s 32M: 7m 45.93s

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Jurrunio said:

not nearly as extreme but yes you're right

What should I do then? Is there any benifit for 1080p monitors?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Without Scaling tech enabled, default resolution changes,...Forcing 900p on a 1080p introduces bad quality scaling and more blur than 900p native.

 

When TAA or bad SMAA Antialiasing blurs the hell out of a game at 1080p I use Nvidia Sharpening if supported.

Or if I'm using negative resolution scaling... lowering from native 1080p.

That's a use case or two...

 

Using it can cost a frame or few.. vs AVG FPS.

 

Maximums - Asus Z97-K /w i5 4690 Bclk @106.9Mhz * x39 = 4.17Ghz, 8GB of 2600Mhz DDR3,.. Gigabyte GTX970 G1-Gaming @ 1550Mhz

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, SkilledRebuilds said:

When TAA or bad SMAA Antialiasing blurs the he'll out of a game at 1080p I use Nvidia Sharpening if supported.

Or if I'm using negative resolution scaling... lowering from native 1080p.

That's a use case or two...

 

Using it can cost a frame or few.. vs AVG FPS.

 

When it's blurred applying sharpening over it can't bring back the lost details, so best to use lower lvl of AA + sharpening. Is that what you meant?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Mr.Stork said:

When it's blurred applying sharpening over it can't bring back the lost details, so best to use lower lvl of AA + sharpening. Is that what you meant?

Its not an absolute fix for the blur 

It's subtle improvements to a shitty looking blurred AA. not all games need it though..

 

But CODMW 2019 Beta looks fantastic with 70-80% Sharpening and Horrible Vaseline Blur with it disabled and using SMAA2x in game on both tries.

 

It's not a fix, just makes a bad situation a little better.

Maximums - Asus Z97-K /w i5 4690 Bclk @106.9Mhz * x39 = 4.17Ghz, 8GB of 2600Mhz DDR3,.. Gigabyte GTX970 G1-Gaming @ 1550Mhz

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Captain here. The image sharpening feature is meant to be used in games that have internal scaling rendering option like AC Oddessey, so the game runs at native resolution like 1080p but the assets are rendered internally at 900p. And then if you apply sharpening, it's almost indestiguishable from native. However if you change your actual monitor resolution, to anything but native, no amount of sharpening will fix the crap. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

On 11/9/2019 at 8:40 AM, Boby said:

Captain here. The image sharpening feature is meant to be used in games that have internal scaling rendering option like AC Oddessey, so the game runs at native resolution like 1080p but the assets are rendered internally at 900p. And then if you apply sharpening, it's almost indestiguishable from native. However if you change your actual monitor resolution, to anything but native, no amount of sharpening will fix the ███.

OHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHWWWW, so that was the problem. I get it now. Well this is the best answer I got. Thanks! Gonna close the post now.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yeah, there are mostly TV's and some PC monitors that have upscaler too, so on them its fine if you change the resolution, but this is rather new, most PC monitors don't have upscalers and anything different then native is just terrible.

That's why consoles 900p looks decent on 4k TV, as assets are internally rendered at 900p, sharpened and output signal is 1080p and then TV upscale it to 4k.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

×