Intel will probably be in deep doodoo come 7/7

[JayzSub]

12 cores* looks as my brother drools *

Me I'm getting me the 3800X since I game more then number crunching like my brother. 

Those that bought the i9 9900k is so pooped on, since they have to disable the HT for safety purposes. 

Intel = Darth vader

AMD = Luke? Kylo? Rey? 

 

 

[GoldenLag]

Considering the deep pockets of Intel. They will do fine. 

[Totally Average Gameplay]

Intel had so long of a lead in the market before Ryzen, that when it came out Intel didn't know what to do. That, and they still haven't fixed their vulnerabilities will lead to the consumers moving to their neighbor Dinkleberg I mean AMD. Now we have a real competition for the longest time. It's rewind time

[Oalei]

Intel probably have something up it sleeves like i9 9900K

[JayzSub]

5 minutes ago, Oalei said:

Intel probably have something up it sleeves like i9 9900K

And that's why AMD didn't launch the 16core, that's their nuke

 

[Fasauceome]

28 minutes ago, JayzSub said:

Me I'm getting me the 3800X since I game more then number crunching like my brother

The 3900x has higher turbo so it is better for gaming, a real flagship. But overclocking is likely similar if you take that route

[Stormseeker9]

7 minutes ago, JayzSub said:

And that's why AMD didn't launch the 16core, that's their nuke

 

War is on

[Oalei]

8 minutes ago, JayzSub said:

And that's why AMD didn't launch the 16core, that's their nuke

 

Probably at E3 will get more detailed information on E3 its been too hyped by Lisa tbh.

[JayzSub]

1 minute ago, Oalei said:

Probably at E3 will get more detailed information on E3 its been too hyped by Lisa tbh.

Im not as optimistic with the Navi but best of luck. 

 

[Oalei]

2 minutes ago, JayzSub said:

Im not as optimistic with the Navi but best of luck. 

 

i wouldnt really complain to see a RTX 2070 performance for 1660Ti/2060 Pricing tbh.

 

Just realised if that really happens RIP Vega and 1080.

Edited May 27, 2019 by Oalei

[JayzSub]

1 minute ago, Oalei said:

i wouldnt really complain to see a RTX 2070 performance for 1660Ti/2060 Pricing tbh.

If that happens, hell yeah it be AMD's biggest dump on intel and nvidia 

[RejZoR]

8 minutes ago, Oalei said:

i wouldnt really complain to see a RTX 2070 performance for 1660Ti/2060 Pricing tbh.

 

Just realised if that really happens RIP Vega and 1080.

I wouldn't say that. Anyone already owning RX Vega or GTX 1080 are good for quite some more time. People building new PC or upgrading from older graphic card will be excited though.

[Oalei]

1 minute ago, RejZoR said:

I wouldn't say that. Anyone already owning RX Vega or GTX 1080 are good for quite some more time. People building new PC or upgrading from older graphic card will be excited though.

not to the one who owned it but the buyer who want 2070 permformance level.

[RasmusDC]

well cores has shown not to be important in gaming, well of course 4 core, and now 6 core, intel has always had the lead in performance pr core, and still do, if AMD is to compete as a gaming cpu, upping cores will not help at all..

 

maybe the new generation of consoles, might change core count demand... but the Ryzen story or threadripper, has been the boy who cried wolf, they have yet to really impress as a top gaming performance cpu, but it is a GOOD alternative....

 

for work it has much more value.

[JayzSub]

2 minutes ago, RasmusDC said:

well cores has shown not to be important in gaming, well of course 4 core, and now 6 core, intel has always had the lead in performance pr core, and still do, if AMD is to compete as a gaming cpu, upping cores will not help at all..

 

maybe the new generation of consoles, might change core count demand... but the Ryzen story or threadripper, has been the boy who cried wolf, they have yet to really impress as a top gaming performance cpu, but it is a GOOD alternative....

 

for work it has much more value.

AMD was not aiming to win the gaming arena, they are aiming for the enterprise arena, Ryzen and Radeon are just tech trickled down from epyc and enterprise graphics, gaming to AMD will always be second tier. 

[Zodiark1593]

21 minutes ago, RasmusDC said:

well cores has shown not to be important in gaming, well of course 4 core, and now 6 core, intel has always had the lead in performance pr core, and still do, if AMD is to compete as a gaming cpu, upping cores will not help at all..

 

maybe the new generation of consoles, might change core count demand... but the Ryzen story or threadripper, has been the boy who cried wolf, they have yet to really impress as a top gaming performance cpu, but it is a GOOD alternative....

 

for work it has much more value.

If the IPC gain recently reported holds genuine, Zen 2 may match or outpace Intel in single thread performance (and consequently, gaming performance as well), even with a small clock speed disadvantage.

[JayzSub]

4 minutes ago, Zodiark1593 said:

If the IPC gain recently reported holds genuine, Zen 2 may match or outpace Intel in single thread performance (and consequently, gaming performance as well), even with a small clock speed disadvantage.

Intel's so called value went out the window with zen2s IPC improvements, but one thing I'm sure is you most likely will not see itx builds with the 12  core. 

[Zodiark1593]

1 minute ago, JayzSub said:

Intel's so called value went out the window with zen2s IPC improvements, but one thing I'm sure is you most likely will not see itx builds with the 12  core. 

I want to see AMD go the slumlord route and kill Intel's Atom in one shot with a dual core Zen 2 part aimed at the sub-$300 notebook market. Preferably passively cooled.

 

From there, put the squeeze on Intel by getting more design wins on upper scale devices. Evil plan for world dominance is a go.