1070 ti Is 1070ti enough to run 3 monitors at 1080p 60/70hz?

[Quzzu]

As above, is a Asus 1070ti Cerberus enough to run most games at ultra or mid at 60/75hz? Im looking for a 3 monitors setup or 1440p ultrawide (100hz) 

[Princess Luna]

Go with the ultrawide, it'll be better than 3 1080p monitos stack up, personally speaking if the main purpose is game.

 

Either ways a 1070 Ti is enough yes, but you won't be maxing out settings obviously, going easy on anti-aliasing and adjust settings a little for more balance between performance and eye candy should be enough though.

[Mick Naughty]

If by 60 hz you mean 60 FPS sure. The card can do that with an ultra wide. Maybe get by with triple. Depends on the games really. 

 

Cod id prefer an ultra wide. Bf I prefer triple. Anything non FPS would be better on an ultrawide. 

[NibbaTokyoDrift]

Go with the Ultrawide, Triple 1080p Monitors are cool but can run into more Unplayable scenarios than the ultrawide. If you're into Sim-Racing go with the Triple Monitor Setup. And if not I would strongly suggest the ultrawide. And your GPU is the perfect match for an ultrawide too.

 

[GamerDude]

14 minutes ago, Mick Naughty said:

If by 60 hz you mean 60 FPS sure. The card can do that with an ultra wide. Maybe get by with triple. Depends on the games really. 

 

Cod id prefer an ultra wide. Bf I prefer triple. Anything non FPS would be better on an ultrawide. 

Actually, playing FPS games on 21:9 is quite enjoyable, it's when you go up to 32:9 that certain FPS games aren't quite suitable. While 21:9 is fun for just about every game genre out now, 32:9 is great for slower paced FPS, like Strange Brigade/Metro series/Crysis series/CoD/BF series/Doom/etc. For faster paced FPS, like UT3 and the like, not quite so good because too much is going on the screen while you're running around, jumping and shooting.....I'd tried it, and I find it a tad disconcerting. Funny that when I was younger, EyeFinity 3x 1920x1200 monitors didn't bother me, guess I'm getting old.

[Mick Naughty]

15 minutes ago, GamerDude said:

Actually, playing FPS games on 21:9 is quite enjoyable, it's when you go up to 32:9 that certain FPS games aren't quite suitable. While 21:9 is fun for just about every game genre out now, 32:9 is great for slower paced FPS, like Strange Brigade/Metro series/Crysis series/CoD/BF series/Doom/etc. For faster paced FPS, like UT3 and the like, not quite so good because too much is going on the screen while you're running around, jumping and shooting.....I'd tried it, and I find it a tad disconcerting. Funny that when I was younger, EyeFinity 3x 1920x1200 monitors didn't bother me, guess I'm getting old.

Guess it depends on the skill at that point. Me seeing more in bf takes priority. 

Only perk of me using an ultra wide is being able to play cod at all without a way to fix it. Unlike bf actually supporting triple screen. 

 

I only play cod or bf as unreal is dead. 

[pas008]

I love triple head gaming been doing it for long while, its very hit and miss on games

and sometimes alot of work to get working and there are fixers like wsfixer and flawless widescreen

which I havent needed to use for the longest while

but you will get fisheye effect on many games too

I started with

softh on crts

th2go that was pretty awesome made things easier

eyefintiy once that came out but I always had issues with active adapters

been on nvidia surround since 200/400 series, think I went 460sli and they gave the go surround but added support for my 260sli

I am also sli user too, prolly will be until support drops  from nvidia and 3rd party too