100FPS in CS with RTX2070 & Ryzen 5 1600..

[kriptcs]

Hey guys, So I have recently upgraded my gpu (GTX 1050 -> RTX 2070) and the in game perfomance hasn't changed at all..

 

I ran RivaTuner to look for any bottlenecks but I couldn't find any.

The cpu usage in game is 20% and the gpu usage in game is about the same and the temps stay really low, we're talking 40C-60C.

I have a clean windows, with only steam, vibrance gui, and nvidia drivers running while playing.

I was using the lowest settings possible at 1280x1024 playing FFA (about 20 people on the server), and I was getting about 100-150 FPS..

What can it be that cuts away from perfomance?

[TH3R34P3R]

Try to use higher res?

[Princess Luna]

You have changed your GPU Architecture, it is highly advisable that you DDU in safe mode to reinstall the drivers fresh new.

 

Also considering your CPU is just a Ryzen 5 1600, reducing your graphical settings and resolution will get to a point it'll produce no difference what so ever as you're completely CPU bound and your GPU is already not doing any thing.

[asus killer]

it's normal for the cpu usage to be like that, the game couldn't care less how many cores you've got, but pretty sure the gpu should give you more fps

[Zando_]

7 minutes ago, TH3R34P3R said:

Try to use higher res?

^^^ when running my 980 Ti with an R5 1600, I had to push Unigine Valley to 1440p to use 100% of the card, same with my Vega FE and R7 2700X, at 1080p the cards are only at 60% or so, and this is in games a lot more intensive than CS:GO.

[kriptcs]

5 minutes ago, Zando Bob said:

^^^ when running my 980 Ti with an R5 1600, I had to push Unigine Valley to 1440p to use 100% of the card, same with my Vega FE and R7 2700X, at 1080p the cards are only at 60% or so, and this is in games a lot more intensive than CS:GO.

Well..do you try to say that if I turn my res up I will get more fps? Eitherway, I am a competitve player, and I have been playing on this res for about 2 years now., chaning my res would mess up my muscle memory, which I do not really want. Is there any other option?

[DJ46]

CS:GO basically only cares about single core performance, and AFAIK it only uses like 3 cores max with multicore rendering enabled (check that you have it enabled though, makes a BIG difference).

 

When it comes to Ryzen, I'd recommend overclocking your 1600 and after that looking into a program called ProcessLasso. This user on reddit was able to get higher fps when he played with the setting in there, but I don't know anything about it. 

https://www.reddit.com/r/Amd/comments/6870gn/for_those_interested_in_ryzen_csgo_i_just_broke/

 

[kriptcs]

53 minutes ago, DJ46 said:

CS:GO basically only cares about single core performance, and AFAIK it only uses like 3 cores max with multicore rendering enabled (check that you have it enabled though, makes a BIG difference).

 

When it comes to Ryzen, I'd recommend overclocking your 1600 and after that looking into a program called ProcessLasso. This user on reddit was able to get higher fps when he played with the setting in there, but I don't know anything about it. 

https://www.reddit.com/r/Amd/comments/6870gn/for_those_interested_in_ryzen_csgo_i_just_broke/

 

I did install ProcessLasso and all of the settings in the thread, but I get the same performance.

[kriptcs]

1 hour ago, Princess Cadence said:

You have changed your GPU Architecture, it is highly advisable that you DDU in safe mode to reinstall the drivers fresh new.

 

Also considering your CPU is just a Ryzen 5 1600, reducing your graphical settings and resolution will get to a point it'll produce no difference what so ever as you're completely CPU bound and your GPU is already not doing any thing.

I DDU'd in safe Mode and it didn't change a thing..

[kriptcs]

1 hour ago, TH3R34P3R said:

Try to use higher res?

I switched to 1080 low and it's about the same perfomance

[TH3R34P3R]

then its solely a CPU clock bottleneck it would seem, what ram do you have?  @JasonHS

[kriptcs]

4 minutes ago, TH3R34P3R said:

then its solely a CPU clock bottleneck it would seem, what ram do you have?  @JasonHS

16GB 3000mhz Corsair Vengeance Dual Channel

[TH3R34P3R]

then ram isn't the issue... stupid question, but what is the in game FPS capped at? or uncapped... ive never played CSGO or any CS game period... so no clue what the settings are like.  

[kriptcs]

Just now, TH3R34P3R said:

then ram isn't the issue... stupid question, but what is the in game FPS capped at? or uncapped... ive never played CSGO or any CS game period... so no clue what the settings are like.  

it's uncapped.

[kriptcs]

@TH3R34P3R

90% usage on only one core in main menu with Multicore Rendering Enabled

70-90% usage on that very core and none other in the most stressful environment in cs

80-90% when Multicore Rendering is disabled ( perfomance did drop to 60-80 fps)

^^^^ Main menu, look at CPU1 in comparison with all the other 11.

^^ In came in a stressful environment, still the same situation.

^^^ Multicore Rendering Disabled (Did see a perfomance drop)

[Mira Yurizaki]

While I doubt it would help much, you could go to Task Manager -> Details tab and set the processor affinity for CS:GO to CPU0-5 or CPU6-11. Assuming those are the logical processors on each CCX, this will force the game to run on a single CCX. Cores sharing data between CCX's is more painful than within the same CCX.

[kriptcs]

49 minutes ago, M.Yurizaki said:

While I doubt it would help much, you could go to Task Manager -> Details tab and set the processor affinity for CS:GO to CPU0-5 or CPU6-11. Assuming those are the logical processors on each CCX, this will force the game to run on a single CCX. Cores sharing data between CCX's is more painful than within the same CCX.

Core distributing rose when I set the affinity to 6-11, with a perfomance which is on average now 180 (eyballed average, but still), so it did help quite a lot

[Mira Yurizaki]

1 minute ago, JasonHS said:

Core distributing rose when I set the affinity to 6-11, with a perfomance which is on average now 180 (eyballed average, but still), so it did help quite a lot

This is a pleasantly unexpected result.

[DJ46]

On 11/29/2018 at 6:16 PM, JasonHS said:

I did install ProcessLasso and all of the settings in the thread, but I get the same performance.

The settings in the thread weren't really meant for an R5 I believe, so I'm not surprised.

 

I'm glad you got some more performance thanks to affinity. I'd continue to play around with settings like that and squeeze as much performance out of it as possible.

[Turtle Rig]

Maybe God is punishing you for playing CS .. lol jk jk man,, .. Here is the thing you hvae a 2070 RTX which can make todays games @ your resolution run at 200fps and drop to 150 once in a while.  Depends on games of course.  As far as CS,  That GPU is pissed because even a 760 can play at 150fps.  So ya with a 2070 in CS you should be 300fps at all times with zero performance drops even with 32 players.  Your CPU is holding you back, PERIOD.

[PlayStation 2]

CS is pretty damn terrible at holding higher frame rates on Ryzen (and this is a trend on all Valve Source games, ESPECIALLY Team Fortress 2) because it's not really suited to make use of more than four cores. 

That and the recent update could've cocked some optimization up as usual.

[Turtle Rig]

15 hours ago, handymanshandle said:

CS is pretty damn terrible at holding higher frame rates on Ryzen (and this is a trend on all Valve Source games, ESPECIALLY Team Fortress 2) because it's not really suited to make use of more than four cores. 

That and the recent update could've cocked some optimization up as usual.

hmmm you guys see how much trouble AMD gives us,,, and we wonder why dont Intel nVidia people go to AMD... sighs ...   CS is a freakin popular game which ton of buyers of AMD try to play,, very sad to hear Ryzen bonks out @ CS,,,, sighs

[Turtle Rig]

However I keep asking myself, why do you have a 2070 playing a 20 year old game.  It doesn't make sense.  Man those graphics are horrible,,,  but of botched textures and flat walls..... lol,, either you get a Intel and play CS or stop playing CS and start playing  Quake Champions and Unreal Tournament Alpha, and ,,,,,,,,, the stupid gay war game titles.

[Turtle Rig]

Try Team Fotress ....... if your bothered by the fps count.

[Mira Yurizaki]

47 minutes ago, Turtle Rig said:

However I keep asking myself, why do you have a 2070 playing a 20 year old game.  It doesn't make sense.  Man those graphics are horrible,,,  but of botched textures and flat walls..... lol,, either you get a Intel and play CS or stop playing CS and start playing  Quake Champions and Unreal Tournament Alpha, and ,,,,,,,,, the stupid gay war game titles.

I didn't know CS:GO was released in 1998.

 

Man, Valve must've been from the future to have graphics that good.