Jump to content

Thermal Pad vs Thermal Paste

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

paste is better for very hot components (cpus, gpus, VRMs), pad is ok for lighter components (ics, voltage regulators)

Ryzen 5 3600 stock | 2x16GB C13 3200MHz (AFR) | GTX 760 (Sold the VII)| ASUS Prime X570-P | 6TB WD Gold (128MB Cache, 2017)

Samsung 850 EVO 240 GB 

138 is a good number.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Conman_ftw said:

They are for two very different applications, paste is mainly for things like your CPU and GPU since they have little to no gap and just require the smallest of gaps to be filled, where pads take up much thicker spaces such as VRM components or DRAM chips.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Paste are better than pads (unless you compare shit paste with insanely good pad). Paste can keep hot components like CPU, GPU cool while on full load but pads can't. Pads are reusable, but should only be used for boot test, not stress test.

 

I'm not saying that you can't use them together, but they are used differently, in which only 1 is usable. For example, CPUs and GPUs under full load will generate so much heat thermal pads can't handle, causing them to run hot and thermal throttling to kick in. However, pads are easier to use and less of a mess since it is a solid, so VRAM chips often use pads instead.

CPU: i7-2600K 4751MHz 1.44V (software) --> 1.47V at the back of the socket Motherboard: Asrock Z77 Extreme4 (BCLK: 103.3MHz) CPU Cooler: Noctua NH-D15 RAM: Adata XPG 2x8GB DDR3 (XMP: 2133MHz 10-11-11-30 CR2, custom: 2203MHz 10-11-10-26 CR1 tRFC:230 tREFI:14000) GPU: Asus GTX 1070 Dual (Super Jetstream vbios, +70(2025-2088MHz)/+400(8.8Gbps)) SSD: Samsung 840 Pro 256GB (main boot drive), Transcend SSD370 128GB PSU: Seasonic X-660 80+ Gold Case: Antec P110 Silent, 5 intakes 1 exhaust Monitor: AOC G2460PF 1080p 144Hz (150Hz max w/ DP, 121Hz max w/ HDMI) TN panel Keyboard: Logitech G610 Orion (Cherry MX Blue) with SteelSeries Apex M260 keycaps Mouse: BenQ Zowie FK1

 

Model: HP Omen 17 17-an110ca CPU: i7-8750H (0.125V core & cache, 50mV SA undervolt) GPU: GTX 1060 6GB Mobile (+80/+450, 1650MHz~1750MHz 0.78V~0.85V) RAM: 8+8GB DDR4-2400 18-17-17-39 2T Storage: HP EX920 1TB PCIe x4 M.2 SSD + Crucial MX500 1TB 2.5" SATA SSD, 128GB Toshiba PCIe x2 M.2 SSD (KBG30ZMV128G) gone cooking externally, 1TB Seagate 7200RPM 2.5" HDD (ST1000LM049-2GH172) left outside Monitor: 1080p 126Hz IPS G-sync

 

Desktop benching:

Cinebench R15 Single thread:168 Multi-thread: 833 

SuperPi (v1.5 from Techpowerup, PI value output) 16K: 0.100s 1M: 8.255s 32M: 7m 45.93s

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, Conman_ftw said:

Which is better? can you run them together? will running them together help at all? 

They're for different applications. If you're pairing your CPU or GPU with a heatsink, thermal paste is the right answer. If you're putting heatsinks on your motherboard VRMs or graphics card VRMs, pads are the way to go. Running the two together wouldn't really help things. It would probably make things considerably worse, actually.

Aerocool DS are the best fans you've never tried.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

You don't put thermal pads on a CPU.

NEW PC build: Blank Heaven   minimalist white and black PC     Old S340 build log "White Heaven"        The "LIGHTCANON" flashlight build log        Project AntiRoll (prototype)        Custom speaker project

Spoiler

Ryzen 3950X | AMD Vega Frontier Edition | ASUS X570 Pro WS | Corsair Vengeance LPX 64GB | NZXT H500 | Seasonic Prime Fanless TX-700 | Custom loop | Coolermaster SK630 White | Logitech MX Master 2S | Samsung 980 Pro 1TB + 970 Pro 512GB | Samsung 58" 4k TV | Scarlett 2i4 | 2x AT2020

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 months later...

They do make thermal paste pads that are easy to apply if doing repairs in large quantities. Other than that they perform horribly.

 

As for pads, they are used to transfer heat across larger voids. They are not terribly efficient.

 

Pastes can depend upon application as well. If you are putting a cooler on a modern cpu with a heat spreader just pick a paste off of the top 20 or so and they will all perform the same. If you have a bare die application choose a thick or liquid metal paste.

 

There is also a paste designed to replace pads, but that is a whole different topic. Again this is typically used because it is cost effective and fast when doing repairs.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

×