CPU COMPARE? HELP IF YOU DARE, DUN DUN DUNNNNNNNNN

[echy]

Why is the Intel Core i7-6700K Skylake Quad-Core 4.0 GHz LGA 1151 91W BX80662I76700K Desktop Processor Intel HD Graphics 530

better than the AMD FX-4350 Vishera Quad-Core 4.2 GHz Socket AM3+ 125W FD4350FRHKBOX Desktop Processor?

 

note 1: to open links, hover over the link of your choosing with mouse cursor, and right click, then choose the text "open tab in new web browser" i don't know if the links register, this is the first time i'm trying this that's why i added note 1  . Please spare me i'm a noob

note 2:after clicking the links it will direct you to the cpus and keep scrolling down till you "see specifications" you can't miss it.

note 3: or you can look at the screenshots i've attached to this post

 

link 1: http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16819117559

link 2: http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16819113326

 

 

amd cost way less, and i've seen youtube videos always comparing amd and intel with intel always coming up on top, its pretty obvious that the intel above we're comparing is better than the amd above, but in plain text you can get mistaken. Both have quad cores and 4 ghz. whats the thing that intel has that makes it cost more and beats out this amd. In the blue texts above just as is, if you were to compare this amd to this intel cpu its clear that this amd will win with just the comparison of quad core plus the ghz, but if you look at the the specs behind them and overall, its a much more different story. I want to know why even though they both have quad cores and 4 ghz, intel will win by a landslide.

 

it will be awesome if someone can explain this to me

i don't really know a bunch about computers, so if its something simple that everybody knows and just so happens that i'm the only few that dont know, pls sharee

 

if you're reading this, hi ._.

[zMeul]

better architecture - period

you want more? look at reviews

[Izumi Reina]

So this doesnt get really long:

i7-6700k has more threads

It is a newer architecture with a much higher IPC than the FX-4350

The manufacturing process for the skylake chip is much better than the 32nm process (power efficiency, etc.)

 

 

[spark12072001]

The Intel had a higher IPC, wich means it can calculate more things per cycle, andere it's newer.

[Simon771]

http://cpu.userbenchmark.com/Compare/Intel-Core-i7-6700K-vs-AMD-FX-4350/3502vs2880

 

Simple explanation: It's magic from Intel!

[manikyath]

it's simple: clock speed isnt all that matters. there's core count (toss hyperthread into this pile as well), architecture optimizatinon, cpu cache, and featureset (like max amount of memory, iGPU, ...)

 

intel hasnt really had "great gains" in clock speed since late Pentium 4 era, but i dont have to explain their processors got A LOT faster since then.

[Bananasplit_00]

the Intel CPU has better IPS(Instructions per second) AKA what actiually matters and it has more threads. it is also manufactured on a smaller process

[Shadow_Storm56]

1 hour ago, Bananasplit_00 said:

the Intel CPU has better IPS(Instructions per second) AKA what actiually matters and it has more threads. it is also manufactured on a smaller process

Yea clock speed at the end of the day does not mean alot. you can have 2 chips, one with way faster clock speed but the other perform better.