Jump to content

[NewEgg - US]MSI R9 290X LIGHTNING 4GB [$310]

wyattzx

This is a great deal for those who missed out on the XFX Double D 290x that was on sale yesterday.

Praise to those people who passed on it.

"Rawr XD"

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Is this card the equivalent to a gtx 970?? or is it better?

Same performance.

"Rawr XD"

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Is this card the equivalent to a gtx 970?? or is it better?

 

 

Same performance.

 

 

290x is faster @ 1440p when they're both overclocked by 3-6 FPS in 80% of the benchmarks I tested them with.

Stuff:  i7 7700k @ (dat nibba succ) | ASRock Z170M OC Formula | G.Skill TridentZ 3600 c16 | EKWB 1080 @ 2100 mhz  |  Acer X34 Predator | R4 | EVGA 1000 P2 | 1080mm Radiator Custom Loop | HD800 + Audio-GD NFB-11 | 850 Evo 1TB | 840 Pro 256GB | 3TB WD Blue | 2TB Barracuda

Hwbot: http://hwbot.org/user/lays/ 

FireStrike 980 ti @ 1800 Mhz http://hwbot.org/submission/3183338 http://www.3dmark.com/3dm/11574089

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Same performance.

 

It is inbetween 980 and 970, MSI's Lightning cards are way faster

Main Gaming PC (new): HP Omen 30L || i9 10850K || RTX 3070 || 512GB WD Blue NVME || 2TB HDD, 4TB HDD, 8TB HDD ||  750W P2 ||  16GB HyperX Black DDR4

Main Gaming PC (old, still own) : Intel Core i7 7700K @5.0Ghz || GPU: GTX 1080 Seahawk EK X || Motherboard: Maximus VIII Impact || Case: Fractal Design Define Nano S || RAM : 32GB Corsair Vengeance LPX 

Cooling: EK XRES D5 100mm || Alphacool ST30 280mm w/ Vardars || Alphacool ST30 240mm w/ Vardars || Swiftech 3/8 x 1/2'' Lok-Seal Compressions || Swiftech EVGA Hydrocopper Block || Primochill Advanced LRT Orange || Distilled Water

Folding@Home Rig: 2x X5690s @4.6Ghz || GPUs: 2x Radeon HD 7990 || Motherboard: EVGA SR-2 || Case: Corsair 900D || RAM: 48GB Corsair Dominator GT 2000Mhz CL9

Ethereum Mining Rig: Pentium G4400 || Gigabyte Z170X-UD5 TH || 2x GTX 1060s (Samsung & Hynix) 1x GTX 1070 (Micron), 2x RX480s BIOS modded (Samsung), 1x R9 290X 8GB, 1x GTX 1660 Super = ~ 195 Mh/s

Peripherals: 3x U2412M (5760x1200), 1x U3011 (2560x1600) || Logitech G710 (Cherry Blues) || Logitech G600 || Brainwavz HM5 with @Gofspar Mod 

Laptop: Dell XPS 15 || "Infinity Edge" 4K IPS Screen || i7 7700HQ || GTX 1050 || 16GB 2400Mhz RAM 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

290x is faster @ 1440p when they're both overclocked by 3-6 FPS in 80% of the benchmarks I tested them with.

 

Then why did you go to 970.

Main Gaming PC (new): HP Omen 30L || i9 10850K || RTX 3070 || 512GB WD Blue NVME || 2TB HDD, 4TB HDD, 8TB HDD ||  750W P2 ||  16GB HyperX Black DDR4

Main Gaming PC (old, still own) : Intel Core i7 7700K @5.0Ghz || GPU: GTX 1080 Seahawk EK X || Motherboard: Maximus VIII Impact || Case: Fractal Design Define Nano S || RAM : 32GB Corsair Vengeance LPX 

Cooling: EK XRES D5 100mm || Alphacool ST30 280mm w/ Vardars || Alphacool ST30 240mm w/ Vardars || Swiftech 3/8 x 1/2'' Lok-Seal Compressions || Swiftech EVGA Hydrocopper Block || Primochill Advanced LRT Orange || Distilled Water

Folding@Home Rig: 2x X5690s @4.6Ghz || GPUs: 2x Radeon HD 7990 || Motherboard: EVGA SR-2 || Case: Corsair 900D || RAM: 48GB Corsair Dominator GT 2000Mhz CL9

Ethereum Mining Rig: Pentium G4400 || Gigabyte Z170X-UD5 TH || 2x GTX 1060s (Samsung & Hynix) 1x GTX 1070 (Micron), 2x RX480s BIOS modded (Samsung), 1x R9 290X 8GB, 1x GTX 1660 Super = ~ 195 Mh/s

Peripherals: 3x U2412M (5760x1200), 1x U3011 (2560x1600) || Logitech G710 (Cherry Blues) || Logitech G600 || Brainwavz HM5 with @Gofspar Mod 

Laptop: Dell XPS 15 || "Infinity Edge" 4K IPS Screen || i7 7700HQ || GTX 1050 || 16GB 2400Mhz RAM 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

I would consider Tri-Crossfire, but non-reference with reference isn't something I'd do personally.

† Christian Member †

For my pertinent links to guides, reviews, and anything similar, go here, and look under the spoiler labeled such. A brief history of Unix and it's relation to OS X by Builder.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

290x is faster @ 1440p when they're both overclocked by 3-6 FPS in 80% of the benchmarks I tested them with.

Well generally when you get as good of FPS as you would with a 290X/970, 3-6FPS isn't that huge of a difference.
 

 

It is inbetween 980 and 970, MSI's Lightning cards are way faster

Not necessarily. Lightning 290X can be overclocked a lot more then most others but out of the box performance is similar

"Rawr XD"

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

 

It needs to said that your getting a card with MSI lightning level build Quality at this price. which is much much better than an average card.

System CPU : Ryzen 9 5950 doing whatever PBO lets it. Motherboard : Asus B550 Wifi II RAM 80GB 3600 CL 18 2x 32GB 2x 8GB GPUs Vega 56 & Tesla M40 Corsair 4000D Storage: many and varied small (512GB-1TB) SSD + 5TB WD Green PSU 1000W EVGA GOLD

 

You can trust me, I'm from the Internet.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

 

Well generally when you get as good of FPS as you would with a 290X/970, 3-6FPS isn't that huge of a difference.
 

 

Not necessarily. Lightning 290X can be overclocked a lot more then most others but out of the box performance is similar

 

 

That's what I mean.

Main Gaming PC (new): HP Omen 30L || i9 10850K || RTX 3070 || 512GB WD Blue NVME || 2TB HDD, 4TB HDD, 8TB HDD ||  750W P2 ||  16GB HyperX Black DDR4

Main Gaming PC (old, still own) : Intel Core i7 7700K @5.0Ghz || GPU: GTX 1080 Seahawk EK X || Motherboard: Maximus VIII Impact || Case: Fractal Design Define Nano S || RAM : 32GB Corsair Vengeance LPX 

Cooling: EK XRES D5 100mm || Alphacool ST30 280mm w/ Vardars || Alphacool ST30 240mm w/ Vardars || Swiftech 3/8 x 1/2'' Lok-Seal Compressions || Swiftech EVGA Hydrocopper Block || Primochill Advanced LRT Orange || Distilled Water

Folding@Home Rig: 2x X5690s @4.6Ghz || GPUs: 2x Radeon HD 7990 || Motherboard: EVGA SR-2 || Case: Corsair 900D || RAM: 48GB Corsair Dominator GT 2000Mhz CL9

Ethereum Mining Rig: Pentium G4400 || Gigabyte Z170X-UD5 TH || 2x GTX 1060s (Samsung & Hynix) 1x GTX 1070 (Micron), 2x RX480s BIOS modded (Samsung), 1x R9 290X 8GB, 1x GTX 1660 Super = ~ 195 Mh/s

Peripherals: 3x U2412M (5760x1200), 1x U3011 (2560x1600) || Logitech G710 (Cherry Blues) || Logitech G600 || Brainwavz HM5 with @Gofspar Mod 

Laptop: Dell XPS 15 || "Infinity Edge" 4K IPS Screen || i7 7700HQ || GTX 1050 || 16GB 2400Mhz RAM 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Then why did you go to 970.

because the difference between 100 and 102 is insignificant, benefits being 100 outputs much less heat

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

That's what I mean.

Also depends what 970 you get as well. Gaming G1 for example overclocks a lot better then the others.

"Rawr XD"

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well generally when you get as good of FPS as you would with a 290X/970, 3-6FPS isn't that huge of a difference.

Yep. Especially considering how Nvidia handles Frame Latency compared to AMD. (for more info regarding this, see the link to the post below).

 

because the difference between 100 and 102 is insignificant, benefits being 100 outputs much less heat

Raw FPS, yes, but user experience? Not so much. 

See this post (Read the TL;DR). Admittedly, it's a bit old, but until I can find new benchmarks to say otherwise, I'll stick with that.

† Christian Member †

For my pertinent links to guides, reviews, and anything similar, go here, and look under the spoiler labeled such. A brief history of Unix and it's relation to OS X by Builder.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yep. Especially considering how Nvidia handles Frame Latency compared to AMD. (for more info regarding this, see the link to the post below).

 

Raw FPS, yes, but user experience? Not so much. 

See this post (Read the TL;DR). Admittedly, it's a bit old, but until I can find new benchmarks to say otherwise, I'll stick with that.

The user experience for both are good and bad in different ways. They're close enough to not bother with that either aside from some niche software.

Error: 410

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Then why did you go to 970.

 

It made more since to buy 2 970's than 2 290x lightnings, since the lightning is a triple slot card

 

wow, and here I am using a 970 with its defects and a 1440 monitor...

 

it's still a great choice either way, I don't use above 3.5gb until I start using games with DSR at like 5k res.

 

Also depends what 970 you get as well. Gaming G1 for example overclocks a lot better then the others.

 

I have 2 G1's and I compared one at 1600 mhz vs the 290x lightning at 1200, the lightning was still faster.

 

Are MSI Lightning cards that better? Is there a 970 or 980 lightning card?

 

The lightning is hands down the best 290x you can get.

Stuff:  i7 7700k @ (dat nibba succ) | ASRock Z170M OC Formula | G.Skill TridentZ 3600 c16 | EKWB 1080 @ 2100 mhz  |  Acer X34 Predator | R4 | EVGA 1000 P2 | 1080mm Radiator Custom Loop | HD800 + Audio-GD NFB-11 | 850 Evo 1TB | 840 Pro 256GB | 3TB WD Blue | 2TB Barracuda

Hwbot: http://hwbot.org/user/lays/ 

FireStrike 980 ti @ 1800 Mhz http://hwbot.org/submission/3183338 http://www.3dmark.com/3dm/11574089

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

The user experience for both are good and bad in different ways. They're close enough to not bother with that either aside from some niche software.

Explain. In what way is AMD's user experience bad, such that it is built into the cards? Heat/noise?

I give you that, and I guess we are agreeing here as I'm saying in that post that what setup you have and what you prefer decides which manufacturer is best for you. At the time, AMD was best for me because I was going to be pushing a 4K display in the future (I still am), I didn't care about sound (headphones plus I just don't care about background noise anyway) or heat (I'd be underclocking them a bit), so it made sense. If I were to only be using 1080p with speakers, then I'd prefer Nvidia as it'd be better for that setup. 

† Christian Member †

For my pertinent links to guides, reviews, and anything similar, go here, and look under the spoiler labeled such. A brief history of Unix and it's relation to OS X by Builder.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Explain. In what way is AMD's user experience bad, such that it is built into the cards? Heat/noise?

I give you that, and I guess we are agreeing here as I'm saying in that post that what setup you have and what you prefer decides which manufacturer is best for you. At the time, AMD was best for me because I was going to be pushing a 4K display in the future (I still am), I didn't care about sound (headphones plus I just don't care about background noise anyway) or heat (I'd be underclocking them a bit), so it made sense. If I were to only be using 1080p with speakers, then I'd prefer Nvidia as it'd be better for that setup. 

?

I'm saying that they have their own pros and cons and the user experience is a moot point, what I meant by that is software/drivers.

 

Heat is a bigger deal than most people realize, especially in now popular silence optimized cases. If I'm not constrained by budget, I would be willing to put a premium on efficiency, because inefficiency pretty annoying to me since you have to find ways to deal with it. I wouldn't really consider that user experience.

Error: 410

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

It made more since to buy 2 970's than 2 290x lightnings, since the lightning is a triple slot card

 

 

it's still a great choice either way, I don't use above 3.5gb until I start using games with DSR at like 5k res.

 

 

I have 2 G1's and I compared one at 1600 mhz vs the 290x lightning at 1200, the lightning was still faster.

 

 

The lightning is hands down the best 290x you can get.

 

You have a R4 with 7 pci slots, you would have enough room, with an extra slot as breathing room

Main Gaming PC (new): HP Omen 30L || i9 10850K || RTX 3070 || 512GB WD Blue NVME || 2TB HDD, 4TB HDD, 8TB HDD ||  750W P2 ||  16GB HyperX Black DDR4

Main Gaming PC (old, still own) : Intel Core i7 7700K @5.0Ghz || GPU: GTX 1080 Seahawk EK X || Motherboard: Maximus VIII Impact || Case: Fractal Design Define Nano S || RAM : 32GB Corsair Vengeance LPX 

Cooling: EK XRES D5 100mm || Alphacool ST30 280mm w/ Vardars || Alphacool ST30 240mm w/ Vardars || Swiftech 3/8 x 1/2'' Lok-Seal Compressions || Swiftech EVGA Hydrocopper Block || Primochill Advanced LRT Orange || Distilled Water

Folding@Home Rig: 2x X5690s @4.6Ghz || GPUs: 2x Radeon HD 7990 || Motherboard: EVGA SR-2 || Case: Corsair 900D || RAM: 48GB Corsair Dominator GT 2000Mhz CL9

Ethereum Mining Rig: Pentium G4400 || Gigabyte Z170X-UD5 TH || 2x GTX 1060s (Samsung & Hynix) 1x GTX 1070 (Micron), 2x RX480s BIOS modded (Samsung), 1x R9 290X 8GB, 1x GTX 1660 Super = ~ 195 Mh/s

Peripherals: 3x U2412M (5760x1200), 1x U3011 (2560x1600) || Logitech G710 (Cherry Blues) || Logitech G600 || Brainwavz HM5 with @Gofspar Mod 

Laptop: Dell XPS 15 || "Infinity Edge" 4K IPS Screen || i7 7700HQ || GTX 1050 || 16GB 2400Mhz RAM 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

You have a R4 with 7 pci slots, you would have enough room, with an extra slot as breathing room

christ no, I die a bit everytime I see someone use an R4 or H440 with an 83xx and AMD GPU's, god forbid two of them.

 

I speak from experience having used all vendors in one.

Error: 410

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

You have a R4 with 7 pci slots, you would have enough room, with an extra slot as breathing room

 

 

I have an Air 540, and the way my motherboard spacing is laid out, the cards would be sandwhiched together.

Stuff:  i7 7700k @ (dat nibba succ) | ASRock Z170M OC Formula | G.Skill TridentZ 3600 c16 | EKWB 1080 @ 2100 mhz  |  Acer X34 Predator | R4 | EVGA 1000 P2 | 1080mm Radiator Custom Loop | HD800 + Audio-GD NFB-11 | 850 Evo 1TB | 840 Pro 256GB | 3TB WD Blue | 2TB Barracuda

Hwbot: http://hwbot.org/user/lays/ 

FireStrike 980 ti @ 1800 Mhz http://hwbot.org/submission/3183338 http://www.3dmark.com/3dm/11574089

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

christ no, I die a bit everytime I see someone use an R4 or H440 with an 83xx and AMD GPU's, god forbid two of them.

 

I speak from experience having used all vendors in one.

 

These are not the reference editions of the card, but the MSI Lightning, so they run cooler. Also @Lays has a 4790K, not a FX Series Chip.

Main Gaming PC (new): HP Omen 30L || i9 10850K || RTX 3070 || 512GB WD Blue NVME || 2TB HDD, 4TB HDD, 8TB HDD ||  750W P2 ||  16GB HyperX Black DDR4

Main Gaming PC (old, still own) : Intel Core i7 7700K @5.0Ghz || GPU: GTX 1080 Seahawk EK X || Motherboard: Maximus VIII Impact || Case: Fractal Design Define Nano S || RAM : 32GB Corsair Vengeance LPX 

Cooling: EK XRES D5 100mm || Alphacool ST30 280mm w/ Vardars || Alphacool ST30 240mm w/ Vardars || Swiftech 3/8 x 1/2'' Lok-Seal Compressions || Swiftech EVGA Hydrocopper Block || Primochill Advanced LRT Orange || Distilled Water

Folding@Home Rig: 2x X5690s @4.6Ghz || GPUs: 2x Radeon HD 7990 || Motherboard: EVGA SR-2 || Case: Corsair 900D || RAM: 48GB Corsair Dominator GT 2000Mhz CL9

Ethereum Mining Rig: Pentium G4400 || Gigabyte Z170X-UD5 TH || 2x GTX 1060s (Samsung & Hynix) 1x GTX 1070 (Micron), 2x RX480s BIOS modded (Samsung), 1x R9 290X 8GB, 1x GTX 1660 Super = ~ 195 Mh/s

Peripherals: 3x U2412M (5760x1200), 1x U3011 (2560x1600) || Logitech G710 (Cherry Blues) || Logitech G600 || Brainwavz HM5 with @Gofspar Mod 

Laptop: Dell XPS 15 || "Infinity Edge" 4K IPS Screen || i7 7700HQ || GTX 1050 || 16GB 2400Mhz RAM 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

You have a R4 with 7 pci slots, you would have enough room, with an extra slot as breathing room

Simply opening up the spacing between the cards is not enough if there is not enough air flow to get the card exhaust out of the case. For to high end R9's it take quite a bit of airflow for that. Though my Air 540 handles it with ease, it is not exactly a silence optimized case.

 

 

I have an Air 540, and the way my motherboard spacing is laid out, the cards would be sandwhiched together.

 

 

 Air 540 master race! :D

System CPU : Ryzen 9 5950 doing whatever PBO lets it. Motherboard : Asus B550 Wifi II RAM 80GB 3600 CL 18 2x 32GB 2x 8GB GPUs Vega 56 & Tesla M40 Corsair 4000D Storage: many and varied small (512GB-1TB) SSD + 5TB WD Green PSU 1000W EVGA GOLD

 

You can trust me, I'm from the Internet.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

×