1080Ti with 2600X

[karel230]

Will I get microstuttering or something similar if i paired Ryzen 5 2600X (or OC 2600) with RTX 2080 or GTX 1080Ti on FullHD with 144 Hz monitor? I know, i will get some bottleneck from processor, but this will maybe fix some new games with better (more difficult on graphics) graphics.

[emosun]

god i cant stand to look at him even ironically

[Slottr]

You'll be fine, just overclock the 2600.

[karel230]

21 hours ago, emosun said:

god i cant stand to look at him even ironically

Why

[KarathKasun]

Just now, karel230 said:

Why

Because it triggers them so hard they want to cry?

[karel230]

22 hours ago, Slottr said:

You'll be fine, just overclock the 2600.

Or do you think some i5 6 core will be better here?

[Slottr]

Just now, karel230 said:

Or do you think some i5 6 core will be better here?

Depends what youre doing. the i5 might be better if youre strictly gaming

[KarathKasun]

2 minutes ago, karel230 said:

Or do you think some i5 6 core will be better here?

i5 will be better if just gaming with a high refresh rate display, R5 will be better if you do streaming AFAIK.

[karel230]

Just now, Slottr said:

Depends what youre doing. the i5 might be better if youre strictly gaming

Not strictly, but mostly

[karel230]

1 minute ago, KarathKasun said:

i5 will be better if just gaming with a high refresh rate display, R5 will be better if you do streaming AFAIK.

I will be doing some photoshop, aftereffects, etc. also

[KarathKasun]

Just now, karel230 said:

I will be doing some photoshop, aftereffects, etc. also

In some of those tasks its still a wash.  I know for 3d production rendering the R5 is for sure better.  Photoshop is not very thread aware, so the i5 will likely be a bit better there.

[karel230]

2 minutes ago, KarathKasun said:

In some of those tasks its still a wash.  I know for 3d production rendering the R5 is for sure better.  Photoshop is not very thread aware, so the i5 will likely be a bit better there.

So what do you think? i5 or 2600 (OC to max)

[KarathKasun]

i5 with a heavy OC would be hard to beat in all but the most thread intensive applications.

[karel230]

8 minutes ago, KarathKasun said:

i5 with a heavy OC would be hard to beat in all but the most thread intensive applications.

i will buy non OC i5 probably (If i would buy i5)

[KarathKasun]

11 minutes ago, karel230 said:

i will buy non OC i5 probably (If i would buy i5)

Then R5 would likely end up being ever so slightly better.

[karel230]

1 minute ago, KarathKasun said:

Then R5 would likely end up being ever so slightly better.

OK, thx man

[Princess Luna]

If you're getting a 1080 Ti for low resolution high refresh rate 144hz gaming you should really consider the i5 8600K / i7 8700 / i7 8700K to keep things balanced.

[karel230]

3 minutes ago, Princess Cadence said:

If you're getting a 1080 Ti for low resolution high refresh rate 144hz gaming you should really consider the i5 8600K / i7 8700 / i7 8700K to keep things balanced.

You think?

[Princess Luna]

2 minutes ago, karel230 said:

You think?

Intel is usually the way to go if you need high refresh rates, Ryzen is a perfectly fine CPU for a lot of things, including gaming don't get me wrong but the GTX 1080 Ti is a very powerful card and 1920x1080p is not a demanding resolution, having that in mind the Ryzen 5 2600X will be a bottleneck in the sense to not allow the GPU to achieve it's full potential depending the game.

 

Which can be very frustrating when you have a 144hz monitor expecting 144fps, my Ryzen 7 1800X is always a bottleneck to the TITAN V on gaming loads for instance.

[KarathKasun]

7 minutes ago, Princess Cadence said:

If you're getting a 1080 Ti for low resolution high refresh rate 144hz gaming you should really consider the i5 8600K / i7 8700 / i7 8700K to keep things balanced.

At $100+ more expensive, I would hope they were faster.

 

R5 2600 @ 4.0-4.2ghz should be plenty to push the 1080Ti @ ~100fps most of the time.

[Princess Luna]

Just now, KarathKasun said:

At $100+ more expensive, I would hope they were faster.

 

R5 2600 @ 4.0-4.2ghz should be plenty to push the 1080Ti @ ~100fps most of the time.

It's not, specially at 1080p, depending on the game you're trying to play.

 

If you're overpaying for a 1080 Ti which you'll not fully utilize then using your 'save 100$' idea the right path is to equally save on the GPU and go with a 1070 Ti along side the Ryzen.

 

My point is simply to retain balance and not overspend without need when you're cheapening out elsewhere.

[KarathKasun]

1 minute ago, Princess Cadence said:

It's not, specially at 1080p, depending on the game you're trying to play.

 

If you're overpaying for a 1080 Ti which you'll not fully utilize then using your 'save 100$' idea the right path is to equally save on the GPU and go with a 1070 Ti along side the Ryzen.

 

My point is simply to retain balance and not overspend without need when you're cheapening out elsewhere.

It depends on what you expect of the system.  Over allocating funding to GPU can make a ton of sense with 4K screen costs dropping fairly quickly.

[Princess Luna]

Just now, KarathKasun said:

It depends on what you expect of the system.  Over allocating funding to GPU can make a ton of sense with 4K screen costs dropping fairly quickly.

Maybe you skipped the part he clearly stated wanting 1080p 144hz?

[karel230]

14 minutes ago, Princess Cadence said:

Intel is usually the way to go if you need high refresh rates, Ryzen is a perfectly fine CPU for a lot of things, including gaming don't get me wrong but the GTX 1080 Ti is a very powerful card and 1920x1080p is not a demanding resolution, having that in mind the Ryzen 5 2600X will be a bottleneck in the sense to not allow the GPU to achieve it's full potential depending the game.

 

Which can be very frustrating when you have a 144hz monitor expecting 144fps, my Ryzen 7 1800X is always a bottleneck to the TITAN V on gaming loads for instance.

You have Titan V? Why? What kind of things are you doing with it? How big is bottleneck in some AAA games?

[xg32]

1 hour ago, karel230 said:

Or do you think some i5 6 core will be better here?

if you are going for 144hz, skip ryzen, skip the i5 (8600k owner here  ), and go for the 8086k, or better yet, wait for the i9, it's my estimate that the 9900k will be the king of single thread for at least 2 years and will be viable for 3-5 years.