Jump to content

the 1060 6GB has more cuda cores then the 3GB model. In short, Yes it does.

QUOTE/TAG ME WHEN RESPONDING

Please Spend As Much Time Writing Your Question As You Want Me To Spend Responding To It. Take Time & Explain

 

New TOS RUINED the meme that used to be below :( 

Link to post
Share on other sites

You should get the 6GB version. because even though Nvidia advertises them as the same chip, the chip in the 6GB version is actually stronger ( I believe it has more CUDA cores, or it's just faster). Extra VRAM doesn't hurt either. You can probably find videos about this over on Youtube.

Link to post
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, menchx said:

You should get the 6GB version. because even though Nvidia advertises them as the same chip, the chip in the 6GB version is actually stronger ( I believe it has more CUDA cores, or it's just faster). Extra VRAM doesn't hurt either. You can probably find videos about this over on Youtube.

 

2 hours ago, Jrock said:

the 1060 6GB has more cuda cores then the 3GB model. In short, Yes it does.

 

2 hours ago, Hunter_Finlay said:

Does V-RAM affect performance so 1060 6Gb vs 1060 3Gb?

 

2 hours ago, DodoDodo123 said:

The 1060 with 6gb is better, because of the more V-RAM it has, and, yes, VRAM does influence performance in some way, not totally.

the primary difference between the 3 GB and 6GB is not only VRAM amount, but also the memory in the 6GB version is of a much higher quality and speed, which is another part of the performance increase.

Bethesda PC:   R7 3700X  -  Asrock B550 Extreme 4  -  Corsair Dominator Platinum RGB 16GB@3.6GHz -  Zotac AMP Extreme 1080TI -  Samsung 860 Evo 256GB  -  WD Blue 2TB SSD -  500DX  -  Stock cooling lul  -  Rm650x

CrumpleBox V3:  Xeon X5680  -  Asus X58 Sabertooth  -  DDr3 16GB@1.33Ghz  -  Gigabyte 1660s -  TT smart RGB 700W  -  

Cooler Master Storm Trooper  -  120GB Samsung 850 Pro   -  LTT Edition Chromax NH-D15 ?

 

CrumpleBox 3 ROTF: I5-6400  -  MSI B150m Mortar  -  16GB 2133Mhz Vengeance Pro RGB  -  Strix 1070Ti - GTX 1070 FE  -  Adata 128GB SSD  -  Fractal Design Define C  -  Gammaxx 400V2  -  Cooler Master silent pro gold 1000W

CrumpleBox 2: i7-7820x - MSI X299 Raider - 32GB Thermaltake Toughram 3.6Ghz - 2x Sapphire Nitro Fury - 128GB PCie Adata SSD - O11 Dynamic - EVGA CLC 360 - Corsair RM1000X

 

Perhiperals:  Gateway 900p60 monitor  -  Dell 1024x768@75  -  Logi. G403 Carbon  -  Logi. G502  -  SteSer. Arctis 5  -  SteSer. Rival 110 - Corsair Strafe RGB MK.2

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

basically, the 1060 3Gb version is what was supposed to be the 1050Ti. but Nvidia decided to screw the consumers over by naming 2 very different products the same.

the 1060 6GB is better in every way. more cores, more VRAM and better VRAM.

 

on to the OP tough:

no, VRAM does not directly influence performance per-se.

sure, if you have too little VRAM available you would see performance decrease, tough the heavy lifting is done by the GPU chip itself.

so you could have 800GB of VRAM, tough if the chip itself doesn's stack up the high amount of available VRAM doesn;t increase the performance.

Link to post
Share on other sites

It does. Is it a deal breaker though depends on the actual price. Nothing's a bad product, but a bad price.

13 minutes ago, Grockle88 said:

but also the memory in the 6GB version is of a much higher quality and speed, which is another part of the performance increase.

only true you're talking about the 9Gbps version specifically. 8Gbps version of the 6GB has the same memory bandwidth and memory clock speed as the 3GB, which leads to equal transfer rate and latency.

 

9 minutes ago, RollinLower said:

basically, the 1060 3Gb version is what was supposed to be the 1050Ti. but Nvidia decided to screw the consumers over by naming 2 very different products the same.

If that's the case the 1060 6gb will be way too close to the '1050ti', just like the 1080 and 1070ti. It's also of tradition for the x50ti to use the same core as the x50 cards

CPU: i7-2600K 4751MHz 1.44V (software) --> 1.47V at the back of the socket Motherboard: Asrock Z77 Extreme4 (BCLK: 103.3MHz) CPU Cooler: Noctua NH-D15 RAM: Adata XPG 2x8GB DDR3 (XMP: 2133MHz 10-11-11-30 CR2, custom: 2203MHz 10-11-10-26 CR1 tRFC:230 tREFI:14000) GPU: Asus GTX 1070 Dual (Super Jetstream vbios, +70(2025-2088MHz)/+400(8.8Gbps)) SSD: Samsung 840 Pro 256GB (main boot drive), Transcend SSD370 128GB PSU: Seasonic X-660 80+ Gold Case: Antec P110 Silent, 5 intakes 1 exhaust Monitor: AOC G2460PF 1080p 144Hz (150Hz max w/ DP, 121Hz max w/ HDMI) TN panel Keyboard: Logitech G610 Orion (Cherry MX Blue) with SteelSeries Apex M260 keycaps Mouse: BenQ Zowie FK1

 

Model: HP Omen 17 17-an110ca CPU: i7-8750H (0.125V core & cache, 50mV SA undervolt) GPU: GTX 1060 6GB Mobile (+80/+450, 1650MHz~1750MHz 0.78V~0.85V) RAM: 8+8GB DDR4-2400 18-17-17-39 2T Storage: HP EX920 1TB PCIe x4 M.2 SSD + Crucial MX500 1TB 2.5" SATA SSD, 128GB Toshiba PCIe x2 M.2 SSD (KBG30ZMV128G) gone cooking externally, 1TB Seagate 7200RPM 2.5" HDD (ST1000LM049-2GH172) left outside Monitor: 1080p 126Hz IPS G-sync

 

Desktop benching:

Cinebench R15 Single thread:168 Multi-thread: 833 

SuperPi (v1.5 from Techpowerup, PI value output) 16K: 0.100s 1M: 8.255s 32M: 7m 45.93s

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, RollinLower said:

basically, the 1060 3Gb version is what was supposed to be the 1050Ti. but Nvidia decided to screw the consumers over by naming 2 very different products the same.

the 1060 6GB is better in every way. more cores, more VRAM and better VRAM.

 

on to the OP tough:

no, VRAM does not directly influence performance per-se.

sure, if you have too little VRAM available you would see performance decrease, tough the heavy lifting is done by the GPU chip itself.

so you could have 800GB of VRAM, tough if the chip itself doesn's stack up the high amount of available VRAM doesn;t increase the performance.

screw consumers from a small percentage gap

fyi gtx 260 and 560ti had 2 different core versions too

Link to post
Share on other sites

The amount of VRAM wouldn't affect your gaming performance if, in theory, the game is only demanding less than what the card provides.  It's a very yes or no sort of thing.

For example, a 4gb RX 580 vs 8gb RX 580 will perform just about identical when a game call for less than 4gb of vRAM.  However, in other situations, vRAM bottleneck can have really nasty effects on your performance when it does happen, actually locking up your game.  When this happens, it's usually best to lower your texture resolution.  Texture drawing is one of the common things that eat up vRAM.  Newer game engines are also favoring more of it, and newer cards also may have more efficient vRAM than older ones.

In the case of the GTX 1060, the 3gb and 6gb versions have differences aside from the vRAM.  It's just a confusing naming convention.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

×