Jump to content

CrystalDiskMark reports less than impossible actual performance

Dooley_labs

So I acquired a few disks from a job I did a few days ago. Out of the few, one of them was an 80GB Hitachi 7200RPM drive. After zeroing it out, I ran a CrystalDiskMark test on it. Not surprisingly, it shows the drive maxes at 75MB/s, but I don't intend to keep anything of dire importance on it, so I copied a few ISOs to it. The second screenshot explains my confusion. It transferred in seconds from a HDD RAID. There's no explanation for this behavior, other than something called short stroke, but I've not taken any measures to set that up. The only other thing I can think is that something's amiss here; my main drive is an NVMe, but isn't involved in the transfer at all. Any ideas?

 

If anyone's wondering, the drive's formatted exFAT, though that's irrelevant.

 

Ignore the anime theme of CDM. It's a joke.

 

?q=4itchz.png 

 

?q=qanq4o.png 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

It's a cached write operation coming from your RAID. That's why the speed is higher than you'd expect. It should dip down to the usual speeds once the buffers are emptied.

PC Specs - AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D MSI B550M Mortar - 32GB Corsair Vengeance RGB DDR4-3600 @ CL16 - ASRock RX7800XT 660p 1TBGB & Crucial P5 1TB Fractal Define Mini C CM V750v2 - Windows 11 Pro

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Try to copy a file that's a few GB's, once the cache is filled up the transfer speed should take a dive and show the real speeds.

If you want my attention, quote meh! D: or just stick an @samcool55 in your post :3

Spying on everyone to fight against terrorism is like shooting a mosquito with a cannon

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

That's something else I forgot to mention; I've turned off the cache on these drives, specifically that option in Windows they tell you not to touch, though it's possible the RAID is doing something I'm unaware of. I'll get a few GB worth of files or one massive file and see what damage I can do. Keep in mind my ISO file transfered at 350MB/s without any dips in performance on the drive at all, but again that may be me misunderstanding the cache of these HDDs.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

×