dbrand being imature and unprofesional.

[Whiskers]

12 hours ago, Drak3 said:

No, they look like cheap, tacky garbage.

 

Which is fitting, because that's what skins are.

 

You're stating your opinion as a fact. You might not like them personally and there's nothing wrong with that, but you shouldn't dictate that opinion to others.

 

Their skins are made of fairly high quality materials, certainly compared to the majority of other skin manufacturers. They also put their skins through a testing programme to ensure they don't in any way damage the device they're applied to; this is why they don't sell skins for the Nintendo Switch as the Switch's paint is damaged by the adhesive used by the skins.

[D13H4RD]

I used a DBrand skin on my old Moto Z

 

Honestly, it is pretty high quality. I have not had it tear or fall apart. The included bumper case did cause the side to peel off a bit but some heat along with adjustments pretty much fixed it.

 

Some people just don't like cases due to the additional bulk. They prefer rocking their devices naked but adding a thin skin to add grip and/or change the look of their phone. It's how I turned my white Moto Z into a black one and also does a really good job of literally de-branding the phone.

 

With all that said, I stuck back to using a Spigen Tough Armor on my Note8 because I'm willing to add the additional bulk for extra protection since it is pretty much all-glass.

 

There is no problem if you don't like DBrand skins. No one has to universally like them.

[-BirdiE-]

This Post: "Someone said something mildly rude on twitter and I don't like it!"

 

OMG! WHO CARES?