R5 1600 4.2ghz 1.38v 75c idle, 75c load.

[Subtle Corruption]

Sound good or trash? ? Bearing in mind i set up the cooler to work like this so idle temps are high because well it's practically not doing anything on idle, much  like how my Fury works on idle.. no fans moving. 

[cj09beira]

have you stress tested it yet? the voltage seems too good to be true

[Subtle Corruption]

Just now, cj09beira said:

have you stress tested it yet? the voltage seems too good to be true

Had the system running this for 3 weeks, seems dandy so far, only issue i have had though is that i want more ghz but as soon as i step over 4.2 all hell breaks loose.

[cj09beira]

Just now, Subtle Corruption said:

Had the system running this for 3 weeks, seems dandy so far, only issue i have had though is that i want more ghz but as soon as i step over 4.2 all hell breaks loose.

4.2ghz on ryzen is pretty good, really rare, specially at those voltages, might be stable at your workloads but keep in mind it might crash under stronger loads,

why do you need more frequency?

[Subtle Corruption]

3 minutes ago, cj09beira said:

4.2ghz on ryzen is pretty good, really rare, specially at those voltages, might be stable at your workloads but keep in mind it might crash under stronger loads,

why do you need more frequency?

Are you really asking why i want more ghz? then you should be asking why i went AMD, then i should ask myself why i don't get more money to pay for intel,and then i should ask if i care about intel's monopoly.

 

 

 

And then we flame and flame, then we get no where, but i'm happy with 4.2 ... just want more.. lol

[cj09beira]

Just now, Subtle Corruption said:

Are you really asking why i want more ghz? then you should be asking why i went AMD, then i should ask myself why i don't get more money to pay for intel,and then i should ask if i care about intel's monopoly.

 

 

 

And then we flame and flame, then we get no where, but i'm happy with 4.2 ... just want more.. lol

it was more in terms of why you think you might need it, i guess its just a want, no problem i agree with you, but i am waiting for next year so that i get slightly higher frequency, and i can actually buy it

[katoptrys]

I can't go over 3.9 on mine, no matter the voltage (I've even tried 1.45 and it wasn't stable). You actually won the sillicon lottery, it's rare for ryzen to go over 4

[Guest]

34 minutes ago, Subtle Corruption said:

Had the system running this for 3 weeks, seems dandy so far, only issue i have had though is that i want more ghz but as soon as i step over 4.2 all hell breaks loose.

Bro what???? Feel EXTREMELY lucky if you can get that high at that low voltage. Many can't get over 3.8/9, with some hitting 4, very unlikely for 4.1, and extremely rare for 4.2. ESPECIALLY at below 1.4

[suh))))))))))))]

you won the lottery dude lol

[davyre89]

1 hour ago, Subtle Corruption said:

Sound good or trash?

It reminds me of school when top scorer missed a mark to 100 and complained while the whole class failed.

[johndms]

I call BS. You do have the best possible board, but the odds of actually having a 1600 stable at 4.2GHz is like 1:1,000,000. If you can run Aida64 stressing CPU/FPU/Cache for longer than 30 minutes, you should immediately go out and buy a phat stack of lottery tickets.

 

I'd like to see a screenshot of HWiNFO64 showing the CPU Core Voltage (SVI2 TFN) line during 100% load. I have a 1600 on a cheap-ass ASRock board and my vdroop sucks. I'm interested in seeing what your Taichi is capable of.

 

I'd also like to see a screenshot of a completed Cinebench R15 render. I'm able to score 1321 at 3.95GHz. I can't go beyond that.

[Sk-Kadin]

3 hours ago, Subtle Corruption said:

Had the system running this for 3 weeks, seems dandy so far, only issue i have had though is that i want more ghz but as soon as i step over 4.2 all hell breaks loose.

Has the computer ever been loaded with heavy tasks