Jump to content

Gtx 1060 3gb or 6gb

jblflip5

I wanna build and don’t know which one to buy.

mostly doing stuff with blender, C4D and after effects

thanks

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

6

Build

Spoiler

Ryzen 5 1600, Cooler Master Hyper 212 Evo, Gigabyte X470 Gaming 7. TeamGroup Viper 4133mhz 16gb, XFX RX 480 8 GB (1000mhz cause dying), Samsung 850 EVO 250 GB M.2 SSD, An old 1tb 5400 rpm 2.5" HDD, TeamGroup 480gb & Kingston 480gb ssds (May RAID 0), 1TB Western Ditigal HDD, EVGA 750W G2 PSU, Phanteks P400s

----------X-----------X------------

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just now, rip said:

no gaming? 3 is enough

blender and C4D? I mean more cuda cores?????????????????????????

Build

Spoiler

Ryzen 5 1600, Cooler Master Hyper 212 Evo, Gigabyte X470 Gaming 7. TeamGroup Viper 4133mhz 16gb, XFX RX 480 8 GB (1000mhz cause dying), Samsung 850 EVO 250 GB M.2 SSD, An old 1tb 5400 rpm 2.5" HDD, TeamGroup 480gb & Kingston 480gb ssds (May RAID 0), 1TB Western Ditigal HDD, EVGA 750W G2 PSU, Phanteks P400s

----------X-----------X------------

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just now, DeezNoNos said:

blender and C4D? I mean more cuda cores?????????????????????????

and how much difference would it make? almost small enough to not know vs a high price increase over the 6gb model

rip

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, rip said:

and how much difference would it make? almost small enough to not know vs a high price increase over the 6gb model

that is a 0.5 teraflop difference which could show up. 

Build

Spoiler

Ryzen 5 1600, Cooler Master Hyper 212 Evo, Gigabyte X470 Gaming 7. TeamGroup Viper 4133mhz 16gb, XFX RX 480 8 GB (1000mhz cause dying), Samsung 850 EVO 250 GB M.2 SSD, An old 1tb 5400 rpm 2.5" HDD, TeamGroup 480gb & Kingston 480gb ssds (May RAID 0), 1TB Western Ditigal HDD, EVGA 750W G2 PSU, Phanteks P400s

----------X-----------X------------

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have a 1060 3GB and I tested the difference with a friend who has a 6GB model

 

Depending on the price difference, it could be more than enough to keep the 3GB. Unless you want to do anything over 1080P (or 1440P at slightly lowered settings) it should be fine, the performance difference is within the 10-15% range. But keep in mind that it -could- potentially require an upgrade earlier on, depending what is needed in the future.

Frostbite (White build PC)

Spoiler

MSI B350M Mortar Arctic - Ryzen 5 1600 @ 3.9 GHz - Corsair H60 - ASUS GTX 1060 3GB DUAL OC @ (2130 MHz Core Clock + 4600 MHz Mem Clock)

2x8GB 3200MHz Corsair Vengeance C16 Corsair 400C White - EVGA 650 GQ

 

  Razer Deathadder Chroma - Razer Blackwidow Tournament Edition Chroma - Sennheiser HD 598 SR - LG 24MP59G-P

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

22 minutes ago, rip said:

and how much difference would it make? almost small enough to not know vs a high price increase over the 6gb model

the 6gb model has more cuda cores and more vram worth it for a bump in price for this scenario

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

+30% more price for +10% more performance is not really advisible

 

by the time the extra VRAM comes in handy, better GPU's will be out anyway

PC Build: R5-1600.  Scythe Mugen 5.  GTX 1060.  120 GB SSD.  1 TB HDD.  FDD Mini C.  8 GB RAM (3000 MHz).  Be Quiet Pure Wings 2.  Capstone-550.  Deepcool 350 RGB.

Peripherals: Qisan Magicforce (80%) w/ Gateron Blues.  Razer Naga Chroma.  Lenovo 24" 1440p IPS.  PS4 Controller.

Audio: Focusrite (Solo, 2nd), SM57, Triton Fethead, AKG c214, Sennheiser HD598's, ATH-M50x, AKG K240, Novation Launchkey

Wishlist: MP S-87, iPad, Yamaha HS5's, more storage

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just now, Aidanlockett1 said:

the 6gb model has more cuda cores and more vram worth it for a bump in price for this scenario

 

21 minutes ago, DeezNoNos said:

that is a 0.5 teraflop difference which could show up. 

This is Adobe Premiere for example. You can see when rendering 1080p video the difference between a 1070/1080 or a 1060 is almost non existent

 

pic_disp.php?id=40573&width=650

 

Blender takes 71 seconds to render best on 6GB and 72 on 3GB

 

http://blenchmark.com/gpu-benchmarks

 

Sure it's totally worth that extra 1 second when you are paying almost $70-$100 more

rip

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

×