Jump to content

IS $30 worth going from a 1700 to 1700x?

Just now, mrthuvi said:

Holly shit....

So the moral of the story is, stay under 1.4V

[FS][US] Corsair H115i 280mm AIO-AMD $60+shipping

 

 

System specs:
Asus Prime X370 Pro - Custom EKWB CPU/GPU 2x360 1x240 soft loop - Ryzen 1700X - Corsair Vengeance RGB 2x16GB - Plextor 512 NVMe + 2TB SU800 - EVGA GTX1080ti - LianLi PC11 Dynamic
 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

My thoughts are, if you have to ask yourself whether it is worth it then it probably isn't, people getting 1700x or 1800x just can afford it and won't mind doing so, if you have a limit budget and needs to make the most out of it then the 1700 is the one to go.

Personal Desktop":

CPU: Intel Core i7 10700K @5ghz |~| Cooling: bq! Dark Rock Pro 4 |~| MOBO: Gigabyte Z490UD ATX|~| RAM: 16gb DDR4 3333mhzCL16 G.Skill Trident Z |~| GPU: RX 6900XT Sapphire Nitro+ |~| PSU: Corsair TX650M 80Plus Gold |~| Boot:  SSD WD Green M.2 2280 240GB |~| Storage: 1x3TB HDD 7200rpm Seagate Barracuda + SanDisk Ultra 3D 1TB |~| Case: Fractal Design Meshify C Mini |~| Display: Toshiba UL7A 4K/60hz |~| OS: Windows 10 Pro.

Luna, the temporary Desktop:

CPU: AMD R9 7950XT  |~| Cooling: bq! Dark Rock 4 Pro |~| MOBO: Gigabyte Aorus Master |~| RAM: 32G Kingston HyperX |~| GPU: AMD Radeon RX 7900XTX (Reference) |~| PSU: Corsair HX1000 80+ Platinum |~| Windows Boot Drive: 2x 512GB (1TB total) Plextor SATA SSD (RAID0 volume) |~| Linux Boot Drive: 500GB Kingston A2000 |~| Storage: 4TB WD Black HDD |~| Case: Cooler Master Silencio S600 |~| Display 1 (leftmost): Eizo (unknown model) 1920x1080 IPS @ 60Hz|~| Display 2 (center): BenQ ZOWIE XL2540 1920x1080 TN @ 240Hz |~| Display 3 (rightmost): Wacom Cintiq Pro 24 3840x2160 IPS @ 60Hz 10-bit |~| OS: Windows 10 Pro (games / art) + Linux (distro: NixOS; programming and daily driver)
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

15 hours ago, sgloux3470 said:

Assuming a 200 MHz higher max OC as a worse case scenario, that's roughly a 5% difference in performance.   There's no guarantees with the silicon lottery though.

 

 

5% more performance for 10% more money.  

 

 

 

What about 5% more performance for 3.5% more money?

 

I found a deal where its only $10 more. The 1700 is $270 and the 1700x is $280.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

12 hours ago, Sin Stalker said:

What about 5% more performance for 3.5% more money?

 

I found a deal where its only $10 more. The 1700 is $270 and the 1700x is $280.

 

For $10 what the heck.  Provided you have a compatible cooler.

4K // R5 3600 // RTX2080Ti

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, sgloux3470 said:

 

For $10 what the heck.  Provided you have a compatible cooler.

So it turns out its $10 cheaper to go with the 1700x, so went with that before the deal ends. I'll get the cooler bracket soon.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, Sin Stalker said:

So it turns out its $10 cheaper to go with the 1700x, so went with that before the deal ends. I'll get the cooler bracket soon.

What hasn't been said is the 1800x and 1700x will OC close to a 1700 like 100-200mhz difference at the most...........However at 1.35V one should be able to use lower voltage for the same frequency meaning cooler CPU and VRM and less power consumption. 

 

Ryzen 1800X in theory is binned higher then a 1700. Same can be said for the 1700X compared to the 1700. 

 

Saying this as a proud owner of a ryzen 1700. I'd buy the 1700 again but make sure i spend the extra savings on either better ram or a better board. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

My R7 1700 is stuck at 3,8GHz on all cores.

It won't go above that.

 

It depends on your luck, but if I would be buying again, I would go with 1700X and try my luck there.

Intel i7 12700K | Gigabyte Z690 Gaming X DDR4 | Pure Loop 240mm | G.Skill 3200MHz 32GB CL14 | CM V850 G2 | RTX 3070 Phoenix | Lian Li O11 Air mini

Samsung EVO 960 M.2 250GB | Samsung EVO 860 PRO 512GB | 4x Be Quiet! Silent Wings 140mm fans

WD My Cloud 4TB

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, jdwii said:

What hasn't been said is the 1800x and 1700x will OC close to a 1700 like 100-200mhz difference at the most...........However at 1.35V one should be able to use lower voltage for the same frequency meaning cooler CPU and VRM and less power consumption. 

 

Ryzen 1800X in theory is binned higher then a 1700. Same can be said for the 1700X compared to the 1700. 

 

Saying this as a proud owner of a ryzen 1700. I'd buy the 1700 again but make sure i spend the extra savings on either better ram or a better board. 

 

10 hours ago, Simon771 said:

My R7 1700 is stuck at 3,8GHz on all cores.

It won't go above that.

 

It depends on your luck, but if I would be buying again, I would go with 1700X and try my luck there.

 

That's the thing though, it's all luck of the draw.

 

The 1700X may be slightly better binned, but there's no real guarantee of that.

 

I've seen people with 1800X's that need tons of voltage for a stable overclocked in the 3.9 GHz+ range and have a crappy memory controller, and some 1700's that needed 1.32 V for 4.0 GHz and are running 3400+ MHz memory.

 

At the end of the day, any differences between the three are really minor.  Slightly less voltage/powerconsumption/heat, slightly more performance.  It's generally not worth the extra money unless you get a good deal.  

4K // R5 3600 // RTX2080Ti

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, sgloux3470 said:

 

 

That's the thing though, it's all luck of the draw.

 

The 1700X may be slightly better binned, but there's no real guarantee of that.

 

I've seen people with 1800X's that need tons of voltage for a stable overclocked in the 3.9 GHz+ range and have a crappy memory controller, and some 1700's that needed 1.32 V for 4.0 GHz and are running 3400+ MHz memory.

 

At the end of the day, any differences between the three are really minor.  Slightly less voltage/powerconsumption/heat, slightly more performance.  It's generally not worth the extra money unless you get a good deal.  

In theory though binning should make the 1700X-1800X more fun to OC and more likely to hit that 4.0 but its not the better deal. Guess if i didn't get a 1700 i wouldn't have a smaller fan to put over my VRM.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

×