Jump to content

Bypass Cooling Loop

Would there by any benefit to creating a bypass loop or a loop that would skip all the heating elements in the cooling loop (CPU, GPU, Etc) and go through 1 or more radiators ?

 

I work in the oil and gas industry and we have hydraulic equipment that have bypass loops for the hydraulic fluid which is what gave me the idea.

 

Here is a simple outline of what I was thinking.

votlq1.png

 

I am just curious what everyone here thinks about such a design vs just having the 2 radiators in series

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

id be worried about the bubbles and pressure caused by having two opposite pulling pumps

Omega-  I5 6600k | Gigabyte GTX 1060 | Cougar Panzer | DDR4 16GB 3000MHz | MSI Z170 Gaming M5

               EVGA 650 GQ | AOC 60Hz Freesync Panels x2 | AOC 144hz Freesync Panel x1

Epsilon- I7 2700k | Asus GTX 970 | Corsair 780t | DDR3 8GB 1600MHz | EVGA Z68 FTW Mobo

               Corsair 750W G2 | Acer R240HY x2

Upsilon- i7 5500u | 6GB DDR3 | 720p 60Hz panel

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Honestly, you don't need it. However, theoretically, having a rad in a less restrictive bypass loop will increase your cooling ability, since you will have water cycling through the radiator more frequently. However, that would be a minimal difference, and the $ would be better spent on more radiators for the main loop, or really anything else. Even better fans. I wouldn't do it, unless it's a "because it's cool and I want to" kind of thing, and not a "I think this is worth it for the extra cooling" kind of thing.

Main Rig: R9 5950X @ PBO, RTX 3090, 64 GB DDR4 3666, InWin 101, Full Hardline Watercooling

Server: R7 1700X @ 4.0 GHz, GTX 1080 Ti, 32GB DDR4 3000, Cooler Master NR200P, Full Soft Watercooling

LAN Rig: R5 3600X @ PBO, RTX 2070, 32 GB DDR4 3200, Dan Case A4-SFV V4, 120mm AIO for the CPU

HTPC: i7-7700K @ 4.6 GHz, GTX 1050 Ti, 16 GB DDR4 3200, AliExpress K39, IS-47K Cooler

Router: R3 2200G @ stock, 4GB DDR4 2400, what are cases, stock cooler
 

I don't have a problem...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yeah the reservoir would either need to be rather large or pump 2 could be a low speed pump to cut down on the turbulence and also increasing the time the coolant is in the radiator.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, tarfeef101 said:

Honestly, you don't need it. However, theoretically, having a rad in a less restrictive bypass loop will increase your cooling ability, since you will have water cycling through the radiator more frequently. However, that would be a minimal difference, and the $ would be better spent on more radiators for the main loop, or really anything else. Even better fans. I wouldn't do it, unless it's a "because it's cool and I want to" kind of thing, and not a "I think this is worth it for the extra cooling" kind of thing.

Haha it would definitely not be a cost effective measure, but if you only had room for 2 radiators would it perform better all things equal having 1 on primary loop and 1 on bypass

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Squi11iams said:

Haha it would definitely not be a cost effective measure, but if you only had room for 2 radiators would it perform better all things equal having 1 on primary loop and 1 on bypass

Yes. But it would probably be just as much better if you took the $ for the extra pump and fittings, and put that into fancy fans. Or fancier radiators. 

Main Rig: R9 5950X @ PBO, RTX 3090, 64 GB DDR4 3666, InWin 101, Full Hardline Watercooling

Server: R7 1700X @ 4.0 GHz, GTX 1080 Ti, 32GB DDR4 3000, Cooler Master NR200P, Full Soft Watercooling

LAN Rig: R5 3600X @ PBO, RTX 2070, 32 GB DDR4 3200, Dan Case A4-SFV V4, 120mm AIO for the CPU

HTPC: i7-7700K @ 4.6 GHz, GTX 1050 Ti, 16 GB DDR4 3200, AliExpress K39, IS-47K Cooler

Router: R3 2200G @ stock, 4GB DDR4 2400, what are cases, stock cooler
 

I don't have a problem...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

39 minutes ago, Squi11iams said:

Would there by any benefit to creating a bypass loop or a loop that would skip all the heating elements in the cooling loop (CPU, GPU, Etc) and go through 1 or more radiators ?

I work in the oil and gas industry and we have hydraulic equipment that have bypass loops for the hydraulic fluid which is what gave me the idea.

Here is a simple outline of what I was thinking.

I am just curious what everyone here thinks about such a design vs just having the 2 radiators in series

I don't see really any reason why there would be a huge difference in performance but other than the extra cost of the pumps and fittings required, but having rads in series or in this case as a bypass usually does not benefit performance as they are already low restriction for the pumps.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Try this one

 

WC101-1.png

 

Or this one.

 

 

WC101-2.png

 

Or this one

 

 

WC101-3.png

Hit the Funny Button!    :D     The more you press it the funnier you get  :)

                                                                                                                                                                                          ---------------------------------------------->

Projekt Wasserturm  Office/Game Room Remodel

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

×