Jump to content

Faster RAM is now needed if you want THE BEST

VfK4YWw.png

i7 5930k - 32GB Gskill Trident 3200 - EVGA x99 FTW-K - RX 480 8GB Nitro Crossfire

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Not necessarily.

 

If you play CPU heavy AAA titles, maybe yes. But otherwise, not really.

i7 4790K || R9 290X + R9 290 || 16GB G.Skill TridentX 1866 || Gigabyte Z97MX Gaming 5 || Crucial MX100 256GB || WD Caviar Blue 1TB

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

28 minutes ago, huilun02 said:

No source, no fucks given.

Digital Foundry.. no fucks given.

i7 5930k - 32GB Gskill Trident 3200 - EVGA x99 FTW-K - RX 480 8GB Nitro Crossfire

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

It's been known for quite a while that faster RAM does make an impact on game performance... the biggest being higher minimum framerates. If you're playing a CPU-bound game, this may translate to higher average framerates, as seen in OP's Eurogamer chart.

 

Unfortunately, someone called Linus made a video which had an absolutely flawed testing methodology (he did not measure the minimum framerate and he used massively high GPU settings on a mediocre GTX 660Ti) and came to the conclusion that faster RAM makes zero impact in gaming. Since then, the internet (including the majority of people of this forum) has been preaching that conclusion ever since.

 

Luckily, some forum members have already debunked said video and Digital Foundry's own testing only reinforces the idea that Linus' conclusion is invalid.

'Fanboyism is stupid' - someone on this forum.

Be nice to each other boys and girls. And don't cheap out on a power supply.

Spoiler

CPU: Intel Core i7 4790K - 4.5 GHz | Motherboard: ASUS MAXIMUS VII HERO | RAM: 32GB Corsair Vengeance Pro DDR3 | SSD: Samsung 850 EVO - 500GB | GPU: MSI GTX 980 Ti Gaming 6GB | PSU: EVGA SuperNOVA 650 G2 | Case: NZXT Phantom 530 | Cooling: CRYORIG R1 Ultimate | Monitor: ASUS ROG Swift PG279Q | Peripherals: Corsair Vengeance K70 and Razer DeathAdder

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

22 minutes ago, HKZeroFive said:

It's been known for quite a while that faster RAM does make an impact on game performance... the biggest being higher minimum framerates. If you're playing a CPU-bound game, this may translate to higher average framerates, as seen in OP's Eurogamer chart.

 

Unfortunately, someone called Linus made a video which had an absolutely flawed testing methodology (he did not measure the minimum framerate and he used massively high GPU settings on a mediocre GTX 660Ti) and came to the conclusion that faster RAM makes zero impact in gaming. Since then, the internet (including the majority of people of this forum) has been preaching that conclusion ever since.

 

Luckily, some forum members have already debunked said video and Digital Foundry's own testing only reinforces the idea that Linus' conclusion is invalid.

For Linus to become better than he already is.. is to see faults, if we don't do this we cannot aid the guy to be even better than he is now. Growth people, think about it, stop being loyal sheep and point out flaws, it's a benefit.

i7 5930k - 32GB Gskill Trident 3200 - EVGA x99 FTW-K - RX 480 8GB Nitro Crossfire

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

That graph is correct.... But irl Noone would buy a Titan x and a 2500k...

If the game is Gpu limited (which it most of the time is) faster ram will not impact performance nearly as much 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yep. Sometimes people are just an echo chamber of misinformation around here. You just gotta show em the numbers. 

.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

that does seem like bigger gains that I saw personally, but I also didn't get the best high speed ram.  Definitely could've gone for lower latancy (and not hynix).  I saw an average of 5-7 fps gains in most games that I play going from 1600 CL9 to 2400 CL11 (Witcher3, gtav, farcry4, the division) but dat frametime difference was substantial enough to see the difference

LTT Community Standards                                               Welcome!-A quick guide for new members to LTT

Man's Machine- i7-7700k@5.0GHz / Asus M8H / GTX 1080Ti / 4x4gb Gskill 3000 CL15  / Custom loop / 240gb Intel SSD / 3tb HDD / Corsair RM1000x / Dell S2716DG

The Lady's Rig- G3258@4.4GHz(1.39v) on Hyper 212 / Gigabyte GA-B85M / gtx750 / 8gb PNY xlr8 / 500gb seagate HDD / CS 450M / Asus PB277Q

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

×