Unigine Valley Benchmark Scores Thread + SUPERPOSITION ***Over 1000 Submissions!***

[Cheddle]

moar

 

 

[done12many2]

37 minutes ago, Cheddle said:

 

 

28 minutes ago, Cheddle said:

moar

 

What are you GPUs actually boosting to during the runs?

[Cheddle]

1 hour ago, done12many2 said:

 

 

What are you GPUs actually boosting to during the runs?

 

About 2,101mhz.

 

2,114mhz was a tad unstable today. Perhaps on a cold morning I would manage a pass at that

[done12many2]

Just now, Cheddle said:

About 2,101mhz.

 

2,114mhz was a tad unstable today. Perhaps on a cold morning I would manage a pass at that

 

Man, I'm hoping that my CPU is playing a big role in my scores as my overclocked GTX 1080 SLI is right around 5% of your GTX 1080 Ti SLI scores (1080p Extreme and 4k Optimized).  I have two 1080 Ti cards and waterblocks arriving Monday and was hoping for a big jump in Superposition. 

[LegionOfOne]

[PCGuy_5960]

11 hours ago, done12many2 said:

Yeah, I'm replacing the 1080s with the 1080 Tis.  

Y no Titan Xps?

[Cheddle]

6 hours ago, done12many2 said:

 

Man, I'm hoping that my CPU is playing a big role in my scores as my overclocked GTX 1080 SLI is right around 5% of your GTX 1080 Ti SLI scores (1080p Extreme and 4k Optimized).  I have two 1080 Ti cards and waterblocks arriving Monday and was hoping for a big jump in Superposition. 

 

not really CPU bound unfortunately . Super position is not well coded. its honestly a very bad engine. see attached for my usage during a 1080p extreme run - GPU's are about 94-100% utilized and CPU is 15-20% utilized.

 

 

 

Spoiler

 

[Tam3n]

43 minutes ago, Cheddle said:

 

not really CPU bound unfortunately . Super position is not well coded. its honestly a very bad engine. see attached for my usage during a 1080p extreme run - GPU's are about 94-100% utilized and CPU is 15-20% utilized.

 

 

 

  Reveal hidden contents

 

Lol, to me it sounds like a very well coded engine. Multi gpu scaling is also exellent. How is a non cpu bound graphics engine badly coded in your mind?

[Cheddle]

4 minutes ago, Tam3n said:

Lol, to me it sounds like a very well coded engine. Multi gpu scaling is also exellent. How is a non cpu bound graphics engine badly coded in your mind?

This engine scales on cores like it was written in 2008 - its using 1-3 CPU threads at best... it uses DX11, and according to @done12many2 a 5% performance gain between 1080 SLI vs 1080ti SLI? not a single one of my three year old CPU's threads are over 53% utilization and the whole CPU is at 15%.

 

If its not the GPU holding it back, and its not the CPU holding it back i'm eager to hear why such a well coded engine isn't spitting out more frames proportionate to the compute power its utilizing?

72 fps on SLI 980s and 138 fps on SLI 1080tis (results on this page) does sound about right mind you so maybe done12many2 has just cooked up the math for his 5% performance gap claim?

The lack of DX12 and poor thread utilization alarm me the most.

[done12many2]

1 hour ago, Cheddle said:

This engine scales on cores like it was written in 2008 - its using 1-3 CPU threads at best... it uses DX11, and according to @done12many2 a 5% performance gain between 1080 SLI vs 1080ti SLI? not a single one of my three year old CPU's threads are over 53% utilization and the whole CPU is at 15%.

 

If its not the GPU holding it back, and its not the CPU holding it back i'm eager to hear why such a well coded engine isn't spitting out more frames proportionate to the compute power its utilizing?

72 fps on SLI 980s and 138 fps on SLI 1080tis (results on this page) does sound about right mind you so maybe done12many2 has just cooked up the math for his 5% performance gap claim?

The lack of DX12 and poor thread utilization alarm me the most.

 

I definitely don't like cooking so that ain't it.  

 

@done12many2: 1080p Extreme: 11631, 4k Optimized: 15523, 8k Optimized: 6904  (1080 SLI w/ 7700k @ 5.4GHz)

 

@Cheddle: 1080p Extreme: 12272, 4k Optimized: 16273, 8k Optimized: 8958  (1080 Ti SLI w/ 5820k @ 4.75 GHz)

 

@LegionOfOne: 1080p Extreme: 11640, 4k Optimized: 18465, 8k Optimized: 8355 (1080 Ti SLI w/ 6850k @ unknown) 

 

 

Difference between @done12many2 and @Cheddle:  1080p Extreme: 5.2%, 4k Optimized: 4.6%, 8k Optimized: 23%

 

Difference between @done12many2 and @LegionOfOne:  1080p Extreme: 0.1%, 4k Optimized: 16%, 8k Optimized: 17.4%

 

While I was able to run my 1080 clocks slightly higher then those of @Cheddle's 1080 Ti clocks, I don't think that a 1080 should be within 5.2% or 0.1% of a 1080 Ti in a "well optimized" 1080p Extreme run.  I can't help but think that CPU performance is still affecting the 1080p Extreme benchmark a bit. 

 

 

 

 

[done12many2]

3 hours ago, PCGuy_5960 said:

Y no Titan Xps?

 

I'm known for "wasting" money and even I couldn't justify that.  

 

If the difference between the two is big enough, I'll switch to the Titan Xp cards when I upgrade to x299.

[PCGuy_5960]

14 minutes ago, done12many2 said:

I'll switch to the Titan Xp cards when I upgrade to x299.

I am really hyped for X299 TBH. I will probably upgrade to it when it launches

[Tam3n]

3 hours ago, Cheddle said:

This engine scales on cores like it was written in 2008 - its using 1-3 CPU threads at best... it uses DX11, and according to @done12many2 a 5% performance gain between 1080 SLI vs 1080ti SLI? not a single one of my three year old CPU's threads are over 53% utilization and the whole CPU is at 15%.

 

If its not the GPU holding it back, and its not the CPU holding it back i'm eager to hear why such a well coded engine isn't spitting out more frames proportionate to the compute power its utilizing?

72 fps on SLI 980s and 138 fps on SLI 1080tis (results on this page) does sound about right mind you so maybe done12many2 has just cooked up the math for his 5% performance gap claim?

The lack of DX12 and poor thread utilization alarm me the most.

Hmm, I see what you mean. I guess this is more noticeable at the highest end multi gpu setups. Using only DX11 still is indeed a bit disappointing - we can only hope for a DX12 update...

 

What perplexes me a bit, is that none of those cpu cores are even close to maxed out (though this might be due to thread being tossed from core to core), while gpu use is at 95-100% (basically fully utilized).

 

Maybe part of it might be that there are no official sli/cf drivers/support (as far as i know)? I read on reddit that some of the new rendering tech they use might not work well on multi gpu setups out of the box. They plan to add proper sli/cf support in the future though.

[done12many2]

5 minutes ago, Tam3n said:

Hmm, I see what you mean. I guess this is more noticeable at the highest end multi gpu setups. Using only DX11 still is indeed a bit disappointing - we can only hope for a DX12 update...

 

What perplexes me a bit, is that none of those cpu cores are even close to maxed out (though this might be due to thread being tossed from core to core), while gpu use is at 95-100% (basically fully utilized).

 

Maybe part of it might be that there are no official sli/cf drivers/support (as far as i know)? I read on reddit that some of the new rendering tech they use might not work well on multi gpu setups out of the box. They plan to add proper sli/cf support in the future though.

 

I'm expecting to see more than a 5% gain in the 1080p Extreme test when I switch from the 1080s to 1080 Tis.  If so, and if I gain the expected increase, I can't help but think that somehow, platform/CPU is somehow a limitation.  

 

2 hours ago, PCGuy_5960 said:

I am really hyped for X299 TBH. I will probably upgrade to it when it launches

 

x99 is still a badass platform, but it has been around since 2015.  Going from Skylake architecture will not only improve IPC, but overclocking headroom, which is already fantastic.  

[PCGuy_5960]

36 minutes ago, done12many2 said:

x99 is still a badass platform, but it has been around since 2015.  Going from Skylake architecture will not only improve IPC, but overclocking headroom, which is already fantastic.  

TBH, I think that all X299 CPUs will be able to overclock to 5GHz. Imagine 12 cores at 5GHz!

[arnavvr]

2 minutes ago, PCGuy_5960 said:

TBH, I think that all X299 CPUs will be able to overclock to 5GHz. Imagine 12 cores at 5GHz!

 

http://hwbot.org/submission/2674342_ace123_cinebench___r15_2x_xeon_x5670_2271_cb

 

Already exists fam

[PCGuy_5960]

2 minutes ago, arnavvr said:

http://hwbot.org/submission/2674342_ace123_cinebench___r15_2x_xeon_x5670_2271_cb

 

Already exists fam

X5670s.... Their IPC is crap

[Jumper118]

6 minutes ago, PCGuy_5960 said:

X5670s.... Their IPC is crap

still.......... intel, bring you the same shit since amd faced desked  

 

but yeah 12 cores at 5ghz should be well over 3k in r15  

[arnavvr]

1 hour ago, Jumper118 said:

still.......... intel, bring you the same shit since amd faced desked  

 

but yeah 12 cores at 5ghz should be well over 3k in r15  

 

I'm not willing to spend $2000 for that though. Grab a couple of 8 core Xeons and a Dual Socket Board and BCLK the crap outta them.

[Jumper118]

4 minutes ago, arnavvr said:

I'm not willing to spend $2000 for that though. Grab a couple of 8 core Xeons and a Dual Socket Board and BCLK the crap outta them.

agreed. 

[arnavvr]

Just now, Jumper118 said:

agreed. 

Is Skylake-X going to have BCLK overclockablity?

[done12many2]

1 minute ago, arnavvr said:

Is Skylake-X going to have BCLK overclockablity?

 

One would assume so.  Its base on "Skylake".  

[done12many2]

2 minutes ago, Jumper118 said:

agreed. 

 

Some people wouldn't spend hundreds/thousands on a huge phase change setup.

 

If you're looking for an insane amount of single AND multi-threaded performance, Skylake-X will more then likely deliver it.  Sure it will cost more, but this is true with most things in life.  You have to pay to have the best.

[Jumper118]

3 minutes ago, arnavvr said:

Is Skylake-X going to have BCLK overclockablity?

well all unlocked chips do and all x chips are unlocked  

[done12many2]

23 minutes ago, Jumper118 said:

well all unlocked chips do and all x chips are unlocked  

Hey serious question.  I was looking through 3DMark's Hall of Fame and noticed that there aren't any Ryzen chips showing up?  What's holding them back in those benchmarks?