560?

[Guest]

Is the 560(non ti) still a good card

Sent from my SPH-L710 using Tapatalk

[Janne]

no

[Sarcasm]

Of course it is

For dedicated PhysX

[MikeTz]

Not really

[LancerBG]

It might be good, it might not. No one can really say because you didnt say what you would be doing with it/using it for. 

[MbV93]

It gives you pretty much exactly the performance of a 650 Ti, check benchmarks of that card and you decide.

[defunkt]

hahaha no.

[defunkt]

It gives you pretty much exactly the performance of a 650 Ti, check benchmarks of that card and you decide.

no.

[MbV93]

no.

No what?

[defunkt]

No what?

just a no to your whole post. a 560 has similar performance to a small french potato.

[Stijndopjes]

i have it currently and it can run battlefield 3 on medium/high

[MbV93]

just a no to your whole post. a 560 has similar performance to a small french potato.

Well then you don't know what you're talking about, the GTX 560 is only a bit slightly faster than the GTX 650 Ti and they give similar FPS.

[Wauthar]

No what?

No, sir?

 

In all seriousness, I have a 560ti and it is kinda showing its age. So, no. The 560 is not a good videocard at this time and day.

[needmorewood]

not currently no

[Janne]

i have it currently and it can run battlefield 3 on medium/high

resolution and fps would be nice to know

[Cryptonite]

just a no to your whole post. a 560 has similar performance to a small french potato.

idiot. the 560 overclocks past the performance of a stock 560 Ti and performs the same as the 650 Ti.

you can reply however you want, my little bro is maxing out everything (1440 x 900) on my old overclocked 560, I've tested the difference between the 650 Ti and the 560 and it is about non existent, now the 650 Ti boost rapes it though.

 

it's a good card if you have it, if you plan on buying. buy something with at least 2 gb.

[Stijndopjes]

resolution and fps would be nice to know

1080p and 50-60fps

[Janne]

1080p and 50-60fps

that's weird, my overclocked 560ti got average 45fps with low preset 1080p

 

oh well i guess it depends on what map you're playing on and the amount of players in the server

[Cryptonite]

that's weird, my overclocked 560ti got average 45fps with low preset 1080p

 

oh well i guess it depends on what map you're playing on and the amount of players in the server

CPU, nough said. you probably tested it on a win 7 based system with you fx 8350 which is known to have slightly lower fps in BF 3 compared to an i5. Great cpu overall, it just doesn't fit with a low grade GPU in a game intensive on the GPU and optimized more for single threading.

 

could also be your overclock on the GPU

[Mooshi]

idiot. the 560 overclocks past the performance of a stock 560 Ti and performs the same as the 650 Ti.

you can reply however you want, my little bro is maxing out everything (1440 x 900) on my old overclocked 560, I've tested the difference between the 650 Ti and the 560 and it is about non existent, now the 650 Ti boost rapes it though.

 

it's a good card if you have it, if you plan on buying. buy something with at least 2 gb.

 

 

And the GTX 560 Ti clocks to the performance of a stock GTX 570...

 

This kind of performance doesn't really mean much anymore because it's the Vram that's becoming more important as displays and applications become more demanding. My card still kicks out decent frames, but the 1GB of vram is really holding it back.

 

It all really depends on someone's display, though. 1440 x 900 isn't a huge resolution.

[Cryptonite]

...This kind of performance doesn't really mean much anymore because it's the Vram that's becoming more important as displays and applications become more demanding. My card still kicks out decent frames, but the 1GB of vram is really holding it back.

 

It all really depends on someone's display, though. 1440 x 900 isn't a huge resolution.

funny how in my quote I kinda made this obvious in the last sentence.

 

I for one upgraded only for the Vram back then because I got a 1080p monitor for xmass and when I upgrade everyone in my friendship cycle upgrades so I decided it was about time hehe.

 

my lil bro is basically rocking my old screen and card together and they keep up with the latest games, even crysis 3 is playable max gfx single player.

[Mooshi]

funny how in my quote I kinda made this obvious in the last sentence.

 

I know, I actually edited after catching that bit since that I agree with.

[Stijndopjes]

And the GTX 560 Ti clocks to the performance of a stock GTX 570...

 

This kind of performance doesn't really mean much anymore because it's the Vram that's becoming more important as displays and applications become more demanding. My card still kicks out decent frames, but the 1GB of vram is really holding it back.

 

It all really depends on someone's display, though. 1440 x 900 isn't a huge resolution.

 

CPU, nough said. you probably tested it on a win 7 based system with you fx 8350 which is known to have slightly lower fps in BF 3 compared to an i5. Great cpu overall, it just doesn't fit with a low grade GPU in a game intensive on the GPU and optimized more for single threading.

 

could also be your overclock on the GPU

i have a i73770k(not overclocked) and the 560 is also not overclocked

[renz62]

I have one and it still works fine with me. but it won't max out all the settings with future games. Planning to upgrade to a GTX 870 next year

[A/C]

1080p and 50-60fps

 

that's weird, my overclocked 560ti got average 45fps with low preset 1080p

 

oh well i guess it depends on what map you're playing on and the amount of players in the server

 

560 ti hawk here, 1080, everything ultra except textures (high), all AA off, HBAO on: 55fps 64p kharg island and kiasar railroad, 50-ish fps 64p caspian border, 65+ fps 32p canals team deathmatch

 

4gb ddr2@ 1076mhz, Q9550@3.86Ghz

 

EDIT: the card is OC'd to 1ghz, the shader clock also got a 50mhz boost, memory I didn't touch because I can't OC it stable high enough for noticable difference.