Jump to content

nvidia 1000 series

keiwein2
3 hours ago, Riki the Legendary Heropon said:

Ridiculous? I don't think you were watching when they said 2x the performance of Titan X

 

So: Dual cards with 750 watts TDP with slower clocks that costs $2000 VS. Single card with 180 watts TDP with 1.7 GHz clock yet you think prices are ridiculous? Wow. No offense, but maybe compare to other cards next time and look at the price-to-perf?

 

I myself might actually get the Founder's Edition if it's good, these prices are great for Canada ($775 without GST for non-collectors)

Performance in what? According to their game "benchmarks" on their site it is closer 1.66 times the performance of a single 980. http://www.geforce.com/hardware/10series/geforce-gtx-1080

[Out-of-date] Want to learn how to make your own custom Windows 10 image?

 

Desktop: AMD R9 3900X | ASUS ROG Strix X570-F | Radeon RX 5700 XT | EVGA GTX 1080 SC | 32GB Trident Z Neo 3600MHz | 1TB 970 EVO | 256GB 840 EVO | 960GB Corsair Force LE | EVGA G2 850W | Phanteks P400S

Laptop: Intel M-5Y10c | Intel HD Graphics | 8GB RAM | 250GB Micron SSD | Asus UX305FA

Server 01: Intel Xeon D 1541 | ASRock Rack D1541D4I-2L2T | 32GB Hynix ECC DDR4 | 4x8TB Western Digital HDDs | 32TB Raw 16TB Usable

Server 02: Intel i7 7700K | Gigabye Z170N Gaming5 | 16GB Trident Z 3200MHz

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, EarthwormJoe said:

So how much would these cards be in Canada? Was hoping to get a 1080 but might have to get a 1070 instead because budget reasons.

GTX 1080: $773 w/o GST, $811 w/ GST

GTX 1070: $516 w/o GST, $542 w? GST

 

Pretty good prices :)

 

AMD Ryzen 9 5900X | ASUS TUF GAMING X570-PRO | G.Skill Ripjaws V 2x16GB @3600MHz CL16 | AMD Radeon 6800 XT Cooler Master MasterCase Pro 5 w/ Tempered Glass | Samsung 970 Evo Plus 1TB + ADATA SU800 2TB | Corsair HX1000iNoctua NH-D15 chromax.black

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

a 1080 for 600? and 1070 for 400?  i totally didn't expect the price to be so low. kinda expected the performance tho

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think the claimed performance gains are heavily skewed by the new technologies, it will outperform older cards in VR and multi-monitor gaming but I don't think the increase will be that high for single monitor gaming. Maybe I'm just a pessimist, I hope I'm wrong!

Primary PC-

CPU: Intel i7-6800k @ 4.2-4.4Ghz   CPU COOLER: Bequiet Dark Rock Pro 4   MOBO: MSI X99A SLI Plus   RAM: 32GB Corsair Vengeance LPX quad-channel DDR4-2800  GPU: EVGA GTX 1080 SC2 iCX   PSU: Corsair RM1000i   CASE: Corsair 750D Obsidian   SSDs: 500GB Samsung 960 Evo + 256GB Samsung 850 Pro   HDDs: Toshiba 3TB + Seagate 1TB   Monitors: Acer Predator XB271HUC 27" 2560x1440 (165Hz G-Sync)  +  LG 29UM57 29" 2560x1080   OS: Windows 10 Pro

Album

Other Systems:

Spoiler

Home HTPC/NAS-

CPU: AMD FX-8320 @ 4.4Ghz  MOBO: Gigabyte 990FXA-UD3   RAM: 16GB dual-channel DDR3-1600  GPU: Gigabyte GTX 760 OC   PSU: Rosewill 750W   CASE: Antec Gaming One   SSD: 120GB PNY CS1311   HDDs: WD Red 3TB + WD 320GB   Monitor: Samsung SyncMaster 2693HM 26" 1920x1200 -or- Steam Link to Vizio M43C1 43" 4K TV  OS: Windows 10 Pro

 

Offsite NAS/VM Server-

CPU: 2x Xeon E5645 (12-core)  Model: Dell PowerEdge T610  RAM: 16GB DDR3-1333  PSUs: 2x 570W  SSDs: 8GB Kingston Boot FD + 32GB Sandisk Cache SSD   HDDs: WD Red 4TB + Seagate 2TB + Seagate 320GB   OS: FreeNAS 11+

 

Laptop-

CPU: Intel i7-3520M   Model: Dell Latitude E6530   RAM: 8GB dual-channel DDR3-1600  GPU: Nvidia NVS 5200M   SSD: 240GB TeamGroup L5   HDD: WD Black 320GB   Monitor: Samsung SyncMaster 2693HM 26" 1920x1200   OS: Windows 10 Pro

Having issues with a Corsair AIO? Possible fix here:

Spoiler

Are you getting weird fan behavior, speed fluctuations, and/or other issues with Link?

Are you running AIDA64, HWinfo, CAM, or HWmonitor? (ASUS suite & other monitoring software often have the same issue.)

Corsair Link has problems with some monitoring software so you may have to change some settings to get them to work smoothly.

-For AIDA64: First make sure you have the newest update installed, then, go to Preferences>Stability and make sure the "Corsair Link sensor support" box is checked and make sure the "Asetek LC sensor support" box is UNchecked.

-For HWinfo: manually disable all monitoring of the AIO sensors/components.

-For others: Disable any monitoring of Corsair AIO sensors.

That should fix the fan issue for some Corsair AIOs (H80i GT/v2, H110i GTX/H115i, H100i GTX and others made by Asetek). The problem is bad coding in Link that fights for AIO control with other programs. You can test if this worked by setting the fan speed in Link to 100%, if it doesn't fluctuate you are set and can change the curve to whatever. If that doesn't work or you're still having other issues then you probably still have a monitoring software interfering with the AIO/Link communications, find what it is and disable it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, DeadEyePsycho said:

Performance in what? According to their game "benchmarks" on their site it is closer 1.66 times the performance of a single 980. http://www.geforce.com/hardware/10series/geforce-gtx-1080

Were you watching the live stream? Sorry for rudeness or inaccuracy btw :( 

AMD Ryzen 9 5900X | ASUS TUF GAMING X570-PRO | G.Skill Ripjaws V 2x16GB @3600MHz CL16 | AMD Radeon 6800 XT Cooler Master MasterCase Pro 5 w/ Tempered Glass | Samsung 970 Evo Plus 1TB + ADATA SU800 2TB | Corsair HX1000iNoctua NH-D15 chromax.black

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, 1adog1 said:

So, you guys think this is going to put AMD out of business? xD

There is nothing to indicate that AMD is not also planning major performance gains. After all, AMD have been saying that this is the generation that they make a renewed impact in high performance gaming. And they also have a 2nm FinFET advantage over Nvidia, as well as possibly still-superior async compute.

 

Also, PC gaming has undergone several revolutionary changes recently, including more commonplace 21:9 gaming, 2k and 4k monitors, and virtual reality. All these things require far more power than previous generational gains could have made possible, and AMD will be taking all of this into consideration in their new GPU designs, just as Nvidia have.

 

Also, if AMD were to go out of business, Nvidia would probably charge a lot more, and deliver a lot less with each new generation. Nvidia's push is possibly in large part because AMD has been talking about how attractive their new offerings will be - whether that's from a performance-to-cost perspective, or from both a performance-to-cost and pure performance perspective.

You own the software that you purchase - Understanding software licenses and EULAs

 

"We’ll know our disinformation program is complete when everything the american public believes is false" - William Casey, CIA Director 1981-1987

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Riki the Legendary Heropon said:

Were you watching the live stream? Sorry for rudeness or inaccuracy btw :( 

I didn't see that part but I'm assuming he meant VR, not regular gaming which is what the majority of people will be doing.

[Out-of-date] Want to learn how to make your own custom Windows 10 image?

 

Desktop: AMD R9 3900X | ASUS ROG Strix X570-F | Radeon RX 5700 XT | EVGA GTX 1080 SC | 32GB Trident Z Neo 3600MHz | 1TB 970 EVO | 256GB 840 EVO | 960GB Corsair Force LE | EVGA G2 850W | Phanteks P400S

Laptop: Intel M-5Y10c | Intel HD Graphics | 8GB RAM | 250GB Micron SSD | Asus UX305FA

Server 01: Intel Xeon D 1541 | ASRock Rack D1541D4I-2L2T | 32GB Hynix ECC DDR4 | 4x8TB Western Digital HDDs | 32TB Raw 16TB Usable

Server 02: Intel i7 7700K | Gigabye Z170N Gaming5 | 16GB Trident Z 3200MHz

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm hoping AMD takes Nvidia's head start and uses that to configure their new GPUs to thier advantage and finally return as a good competitor not only in price but also in raw performance

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

I expected the price, but was blown away at the performance!  WIll wait for benchmarks to confirm, but sounds incredible!

i7 4790k @4.7 | GTX 1070 Strix | Z97 Sabertooth | 32GB  DDR3 2400 mhz | Intel 750 SSD | Define R5 | Corsair K70 | Steel Series Rival | XB271, 1440p, IPS, 165hz | 5.1 Surround
PC Build

Desk Build

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Jaggsta said:
 
GPU Engine Specs:
2560NVIDIA CUDA® Cores
1607Base Clock (MHz)
1733Boost Clock (MHz)
Memory Specs:
10 GbpsMemory Speed
8 GB GDDR5XStandard Memory Config
256-bitMemory Interface Width
320Memory Bandwidth (GB/sec)
 
so 2.1ghz shown was overclocked

 

15 minutes ago, pyrojoe34 said:

I think the claimed performance gains are heavily skewed by the new technologies, it will outperform older cards in VR and multi-monitor gaming but I don't think the increase will be that high for single monitor gaming. Maybe I'm just a pessimist, I hope I'm wrong!

 

Yeah, it's fast, but I don't see it being twice as fast as a Titan X.  I hope it's true, but I'm not banking on that much.

 

Either way, I'll be grabbing them.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


×