Fury X Failing Steam Performance VR TEST..why????

[El Diablo]

Lol its telling me that i need to upgrade my fury x 

 

I havent seen a score so low for this test

 

Why you guys think this has happend?

 

Is it time to upgrade to a 980 titanium or wat?

Edited February 27, 2016 by El Diablo
because

[PlayStation 2]

hint: the source engine isn't the way to guess how your card's gonna do in vr gaming

[El Diablo]

Yeaaa

 

Just funny how out of every gpu i have seen do this,, my one failed

[PlayStation 2]

Just now, El Diablo said:

Yeaaa

 

Just funny how out of every gpu i have seen do this,, my one failed

Yeah, your Fury X is gonna do VR gaming just fine.

[Aytex]

4 minutes ago, El Diablo said:

Lol its telling me that i need to upgrade my fury x 

 

I havent seen a score so low for this test

 

Why you guys think this has 

 

Is it time to upgrade to a 980 titanium or wat?

your cpu....

[El Diablo]

aparently according to that, the cpu is fine

 

its my gpu thats the slow one.

 

funny right

[Deli]

This just shows how "reliable" the test is.

[El Diablo]

another funny part is, my test scores get posted on their database

 

so there should be a load of fury x's failing and people being told to upgrade to a 960

[PlayStation 2]

Just now, El Diablo said:

another funny part is, my test scores get posted on their database

 

so there should be a load of fury x's failing and people being told to upgrade to a 960

kek

[xAcid9]

Probably Fury's aggresive power saving feature at work. Try rerun the test with ClockBlock enable.

[El Diablo]

another funny part is the test ran at someshit like

360 x 680

 

and it failed

 

wasnt even 1080p

 

and amd was hyping the card is 4k capable

 

pftttt,,  bullshit

[WebPlayz]

26 minutes ago, El Diablo said:

Lol its telling me that i need to upgrade my fury x 

 

I havent seen a score so low for this test

 

Why you guys think this has happend?

 

Is it time to upgrade to a 980 titanium or wat?

dude your cpu is ageing your cpu is bottlenecking your fury x get a fx 9590 or a 8350 or a i5 4690k

[El Diablo]

I got an Intel Core I7-5820K , cant run it due to amazon sending me ddr3 ram insted of ddr4

 

So im stuck on this

 

It gets the job done, runs fallout 4 1080p ultra at 26 celcius so yeaa

 

but you are totaly right

 

Card is currently running in PCI-E 2.0 X16 and is downclocked 24/7

[i_build_nanosuits]

3 minutes ago, El Diablo said:

another funny part is the test ran at someshit like

360 x 680

 

and it failed

 

wasnt even 1080p

 

and amd was hyping the card is 4k capable

 

pftttt,,  bullshit

should have bought a 980ti mate

 

 

[WebPlayz]

1 minute ago, El Diablo said:

I got an Intel Core I7-5820K , cant run it due to amazon sending me ddr3 ram insted of ddr4

 

So im stuck on this

 

It gets the job done, runs fallout 4 1080p ultra at 26 celcius so yeaa

 

but you are totaly right

 

Card is currently running in PCI-E 2.0 X16 and is downclocked 24/7

try moving to pcie 3.0 16x 

[El Diablo]

1 minute ago, i_build_nanosuits said:

should have bought a 980ti mate

 

 

WOWWWWWW

 

NOW THATS WHATT U CALL PASSING A TEST

 

somebody needs to make a meeme of your scores vs mine for dem amd vs nvidia fights people love geting into online

[Humbug]

Download Crimson 16.2 and run again. On average the Fury X is only getting beat by the 980ti and Titan-X in this test.

 

32 minutes ago, Dan Castellaneta said:

hint: the source engine isn't the way to guess how your card's gonna do in vr gaming

It's not the source engine. It's source 2. And every benchmark is just an indication. There can be nothing completely representative.

Because there will be so many non-demanding VR game with simpler graphics and there will also be the likes of Elite Dangerous and Star Citizen.

[PlayStation 2]

Just now, Humbug said:

Download Crimson 16.2 and run again. On average the Fury X is only getting beat by the 980ti and Titan-X in this test.

 

It's not the source engine. It's source 2. And every benchmark is just an indication. There can be nothing completely representative.

Because there will be so many non-demanding VR game with simpler graphics and there will also be the likes of Elite Dangerous and Star Citizen.

Valve hasn't been able to do shit properly since Portal 2 so I'm not surprised if the benchmark is entirely fucked.

[Humbug]

Just now, Dan Castellaneta said:

Valve hasn't been able to do shit properly since Portal 2 so I'm not surprised if the benchmark is entirely fucked.

LOL, ok.

You're going off on a tangent.

[El Diablo]

10 minutes ago, xAcid9 said:

Probably Fury's aggresive power saving feature at work. Try rerun the test with ClockBlock enable.

Yea the card was doing the test and the gpu clocks was around under 10%  ,, looks like a software flaw or the latest amd driver flaw  or both

[PlayStation 2]

Just now, Humbug said:

LOL, ok.

You're going off on a tangent.

sorry fam

had to say it

[Humbug]

Just now, El Diablo said:

Yea the card was doing the test and the gpu clocks was around under 10%  ,, looks like a software flaw or the latest amd driver flaw  or both

AMD did say that the new Crimson 16.2 is optimized for this test.

 

But also Valve seems to say that this test is a GPU benchmark, not a CPU benchmark because it doesn't have stuff that normally loads the CPU like game logic and everything else.

[xAcid9]

1 minute ago, Humbug said:

AMD did say that the new Crimson 16.2 is optimized for this test.

 

But also Valve seems to say that this test is a GPU benchmark, not a CPU benchmark because it doesn't have stuff that normally loads the CPU like game logic and everything else.

Yeah, my 290x get 8.6 in this test. 

[El Diablo]

23 minutes ago, Humbug said:

AMD did say that the new Crimson 16.2 is optimized for this test.

 

But also Valve seems to say that this test is a GPU benchmark, not a CPU benchmark because it doesn't have stuff that normally loads the CPU like game logic and everything else.

They also said the fury x was an overclockers dreem.....

 

seems to be a trend in what they say 

 

then again for me the fury x was an overclockers dreem

 

[Praesi]

33 minutes ago, i_build_nanosuits said:

should have bought a 980ti mate

 

 

Damn you. You beat me by 211 points >_< .

 

@OP. Im sure its some kind of failure. Re run it.