Jump to content

Help me decide between 8GB-16GB or 3000mhz-4000mhz

RRGT19
Go to solution Solved by thatguyyouknow75,
Just now, RGT said:

16gb will be but, what is best, 3000, 3200, 3400, 4000 mhz?

The lowest speed. Unless you plan on extremely intensive rendering (in which case you'd have 32-64gb) the speed does not matter with ram. No amount of tabs or AAA games are going to be limited by the available speeds. Go with 3000,its a great price. If you can find it at a lower speed for cheaper then take that

Hi,

I can spend $100 for memory ram, but what is better:

  1. 8GB 2133mhz / 8GB 3000mhz
  2. 16GB 2133mhz / 16GB 3000mhz or above

? (the price is almost the same)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

16GB is better, but if is not needed don't waste money on it (of course, now a days it often is). Ram is ram is ram is ram. Get what is cheapest and will not die.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

16gb is the current sweet spot. And unless you are doing some intense productivity, the speed of the RAM won't make a difference 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

You most likely don't need a 16g kit it is just too much unless you are doing extreme multitasking.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

In order of importance:

  1. Amount of memory
  2. Number of sticks/channels
  3. Speed
  4. XMP enabled (for speeds over cpu rating)
  5. Timings

 

80+ ratings certify electrical efficiency. Not quality.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, brob said:

In order of importance:

  1. Amount of memory
  2. Number of sticks/channels
  3. Speed
  4. XMP enabled (for speeds over cpu rating)
  5. Timings

 

 

3 minutes ago, Rev:) said:

You most likely don't need a 16g kit it is just too much unless you are doing extreme multitasking.

 

5 minutes ago, thatguyyouknow75 said:

16gb is the current sweet spot. And unless you are doing some intense productivity, the speed of the RAM won't make a difference 

 

7 minutes ago, SergeantPepper said:

16GB is better, but if is not needed don't waste money on it (of course, now a days it often is). Ram is ram is ram is ram. Get what is cheapest and will not die.

i have always 2 games opened, like 10tabs in chrome and adobe suite opened...... DDR3 but i will sell my desktop tomorrow.

DDR4 is cheap, so....

 

2x4GB 2133 8GB for $50

or

2x8GB 3000 for $84.99

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, RGT said:

 

 

 

i have always 2 games opened, like 10tabs in chrome and adobe suite opened...... DDR3 but i will sell my desktop tomorrow.

DDR4 is cheap, so....

 

2x4GB 2133 8GB for $50

or

2x8GB 3000 for $84.99

Now that i see your situation a 16g may be helpful so have fun.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just now, Rev:) said:

Now that i see your situation a 16g may be helpful so have fun.

there is 3200mhz and 3400mhz memory for $109.99, is it worh it?.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, RGT said:

 

 

 

i have always 2 games opened, like 10tabs in chrome and adobe suite opened...... DDR3 but i will sell my desktop tomorrow.

DDR4 is cheap, so....

 

2x4GB 2133 8GB for $50

or

2x8GB 3000 for $84.99

As I said before, get 16. Get lower speed and maybe even more. Long story short is that 16 is the sweet spot for modern high end pcs 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just now, RGT said:

there is 3200mhz and 3400mhz memory for $109.99, is it worh it?.

if you have the budget then you may benefit from the slightly faster speed, now don't quote me as I'm not a ram "expert" but i suggest not laying down the extra 30 or so bucks for the slightly faster speed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, RGT said:

 

 

 

i have always 2 games opened, like 10tabs in chrome and adobe suite opened...... DDR3 but i will sell my desktop tomorrow.

DDR4 is cheap, so....

 

2x4GB 2133 8GB for $50

or

2x8GB 3000 for $84.99

Quantity makes a difference. But performance should not suffer significantly given the described mix if one has an ssd system drive and swap file enabled.

3 minutes ago, RGT said:

there is 3200mhz and 3400mhz memory for $109.99, is it worh it?.

In gaming no. In fact in gaming there does not appear to be any significant performance difference between 2400 and 3200.

80+ ratings certify electrical efficiency. Not quality.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just now, thatguyyouknow75 said:

As I said before, get 16. Get lower speed and maybe even more. Long story short is that 16 is the sweet spot for modern high end pcs 

16gb will be but, what is best, 3000, 3200, 3400, 4000 mhz?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just now, brob said:

Quantity makes a difference. But performance should not suffer significantly given the described mix if one has an ssd system drive and swap file enabled.

In gaming no. In fact in gaming there does not appear to be any significant performance difference between 2400 and 3200.

yes i use a ssd for windows.

 

so, i just need to buy the cheapest 16gb ddr4 out there?.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, RGT said:

16gb will be but, what is best, 3000, 3200, 3400, 4000 mhz?

If budget is unlimited, get the highest speed supported by the motherboard.

80+ ratings certify electrical efficiency. Not quality.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just now, RGT said:

16gb will be but, what is best, 3000, 3200, 3400, 4000 mhz?

The lowest speed. Unless you plan on extremely intensive rendering (in which case you'd have 32-64gb) the speed does not matter with ram. No amount of tabs or AAA games are going to be limited by the available speeds. Go with 3000,its a great price. If you can find it at a lower speed for cheaper then take that

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, thatguyyouknow75 said:

The lowest speed. Unless you plan on extremely intensive rendering (in which case you'd have 32-64gb) the speed does not matter with ram. No amount of tabs or AAA games are going to be limited by the available speeds. Go with 3000,its a great price. If you can find it at a lower speed for cheaper then take that

 

3 minutes ago, brob said:

If budget is unlimited, get the highest speed supported by the motherboard.

thanks both

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just now, thatguyyouknow75 said:

The lowest speed. Unless you plan on extremely intensive rendering (in which case you'd have 32-64gb) the speed does not matter with ram. No amount of tabs or AAA games are going to be limited by the available speeds. Go with 3000,its a great price. If you can find it at a lower speed for cheaper then take that

Speed does matter. Just not very much in gaming.

80+ ratings certify electrical efficiency. Not quality.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just now, brob said:

Speed does matter. Just not very much in gaming.

When rendering (in some cases)  and in synthetic benchmarking yeah. None of which is he doing..... So why spend so much more on something that will be wasted. Even if it's for bragging rights, ram speed isn't something someone would critique, only quantity 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, brob said:

Speed does matter. Just not very much in gaming.

 

5 minutes ago, thatguyyouknow75 said:

When rendering (in some cases)  and in synthetic benchmarking yeah. None of which is he doing..... So why spend so much more on something that will be wasted. Even if it's for bragging rights, ram speed isn't something someone would critique, only quantity 

 

14 minutes ago, Rev:) said:

if you have the budget then you may benefit from the slightly faster speed, now don't quote me as I'm not a ram "expert" but i suggest not laying down the extra 30 or so bucks for the slightly faster speed.

Guys, look at this list of memory ram that i have created:

 

http://pcpartpicker.com/parts/memory/#m=11&Z=16384002&s=402133,402400,402666,402800,403000,403200,403300,403333,403400,403466,403600,403733,403866,404000,404133&sort=a10&page=1

 

it looks that 3000mhz is the winner for $84.99 (has $5 promo code on newegg), i'm correct?.

between 2133 and 3000 is not much... $$$$$

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, RGT said:

 

 

Guys, look at this list of memory ram that i have created:

 

http://pcpartpicker.com/parts/memory/#m=11&Z=16384002&s=402133,402400,402666,402800,403000,403200,403300,403333,403400,403466,403600,403733,403866,404000,404133&sort=a10&page=1

 

it looks that 3000mhz is the winner for $84.99 (has $5 promo code on newegg), i'm correct?.

With the promo yes.

80+ ratings certify electrical efficiency. Not quality.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just now, brob said:

With the promo yes.

a mean, it is 89.99 and with the promo is 84.99

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, brob said:

With the promo yes.

 

14 minutes ago, thatguyyouknow75 said:

When rendering (in some cases)  and in synthetic benchmarking yeah. None of which is he doing..... So why spend so much more on something that will be wasted. Even if it's for bragging rights, ram speed isn't something someone would critique, only quantity 

 

23 minutes ago, Rev:) said:

if you have the budget then you may benefit from the slightly faster speed, now don't quote me as I'm not a ram "expert" but i suggest not laying down the extra 30 or so bucks for the slightly faster speed.

Thanks for all guys.

 

One last thing.....

i have read the QVL from Asus's website about viii impact and z170i pro gaming and the memory doesn't appear..

it should work anyway at 3000, right?.

ram: http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16820233863&cm_re=CMK16GX4M2B3000C15R-_-20-233-863-_-Product

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

28 minutes ago, RGT said:

 

 

Thanks for all guys.

 

One last thing.....

i have read the QVL from Asus's website about viii impact and z170i pro gaming and the memory doesn't appear..

it should work anyway at 3000, right?.

ram: http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16820233863&cm_re=CMK16GX4M2B3000C15R-_-20-233-863-_-Product

Yes. The motherboard specs indicate support up to 3400. You will have to select an XMP profile in the BIOS to achieve the rated speed. It will run slower otherwise.

80+ ratings certify electrical efficiency. Not quality.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, brob said:

Yes. The motherboard specs indicate support up to 3400. You will have to select an XMP profile in the BIOS to achieve the rated speed. It will run slower otherwise.

are you sure that will work?, because in the manual of both boards doesn't appear that memory ram that i want.., it doesn't matter?.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

The specs on the Z170i Pro shows memory support for 3400 (O.C.).

80+ ratings certify electrical efficiency. Not quality.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

×