Posted July 23, 2015 Futuremark announces in a statement that it will now discontinue Peacekeeper. It will still be accessible for the time being, but it will no longer be maintained. The reason for this, the company says, is that they say that with the release of Windows 10, they obverse that all web browsers are fast enough, including on phones, and that now the market has shifted to feature instead of speed. Making a web browser faster only results in trivial speed increase the company says, hence why it is no longer the focus. Peacekeeper is a universal browser benchmark for measuring JavaScript performance. More than seven and a half million people have tested their browsers and mobile devices with Peacekeeper since its release in 2009. But today, competition between browsers has largely shifted from speed to features. Modern browsers are typically fast enough on a wide range of hardware, and the differences in speed in everyday use are trivial. A browser's features, extensions, and memory use are now much more likely to be the deciding factors reducing the relevance of pure JavaScript performance benchmarks. Source: http://www.techpowerup.com/214533/futuremark-peacekeeper-to-be-discontinued.html Interesting that discontinue this product the day of Windows 10 is released. This could be due to Microsoft new Edge web browser catching up to the speed of Firefox and Chrome. Seeing that now Mozilla is playing catch-up to Edge web browser, with features like "Pocket" which competes with "Reading list" of Edge, Firefox working on it's own "read mode", like what Edge has now, and Firefox beta is FINALLY high-DPI supported. And that Chrome is trying to slowly improve it's CPU usage, and that Edge will soon after extension support using the same technology as Firefox extension and Chrome extensions, it is very true that the war on speed has clearly ended. And now it is about feature and about providing the best web experience. What do you think? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options... Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Posted July 23, 2015 Every since Chrome first came out +major updates I didn't really care about browser speed. Was irrelevant at that point. Now when I got a Macbook I only use Safari. Reason being that other browsers are so very hungry compared to Safari on OS X. I get a lot more battery life using Safari where as hours are shaved off using Chrome. I think it is good they shifted away from speed. Should focus on usability, features and stability. Command Center: Case: Corsair 900D; PSU: Corsair AX1200i; Mobo: ASUS Rampage IV Black Edition; CPU: i7-3970x; CPU Cooler: Corsair H100i; GPU: 2x ASUS DCII GTX780Ti OC; RAM: Corsair Dominator Platinum 64GB (8x8) 2133MHz CL9; Speaker: Logitech Z2300; HDD 1: Samsung 840 EVO 500GB; HDD 2: 2x Samsung 540 EVO 500GB (Raid 0); HDD 3: 2x Seagate Barracuda 3TB (Raid 0); Monitor 1: LG 42" LED TV; Monitor 2: BenQ XL2420TE; Headphones 1: Denon AH-D7000; Headphones 2: Audio-Technica AD1000PRM; Headphones 3: Sennheiser Momentum Over-Ear; Headset: Steelseries Siberia Elite; Keyboard: Corsair Strafe RBG; Mouse: Steelseries Rival 300; Other: Macbook Pro 15 Retina (Mid-2014), PlayStation 4, Nexus 7 32GB (2014), iPhone 6 64GB, Samsung Galaxy S6 64GB Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options... Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Posted July 23, 2015 Chrome master race. It may not be the Abousulte fastest might not be the lightest but the ecosystem is just to good. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options... Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Posted July 23, 2015 Total BS. Something stinks here...why woudn't they wait Edge to become a little more mature so it can beat chrome at every test? I mean...traffic for them, right? ∥FX8320 4.2Ghz@1.280v& 4.5 Ghz Turbo@1.312v ∥Thermalright HR-02/w TY-147 140MM+Arctic Cooling 120MM∥VRM cooled by AMD Stock Cooler Fan 70MM 0-7200 RPM PWM controlled via Speedfan∥Gigabyte GA990XA-UD3∥Gigabyte HD 7970 SOC@R9 280X∥120GiBee Kingston HyperX 3K∥2TB Toshiba DT01ACA200∥1TB WD Green∥Zalman Z11+Enermax 140MM TB Apollish RED+2X Deepcool 120MM and stock fans running @5V∥Single Channel Patriot 8GB (1333MHZ)+Dual Channel 4GB&2GB Kingston NANO Gaming(1600MHZ CL9)=14GB 1,600 Jigahurtz 10-10-9-29 CR1@1.28V∥Sirtec High Power 500W∥ASUS Xonar DG, Logitech F510∥Sony MDR-XD200∥Edifier X220 + Edifier 3200∥A4Tech XL-747H 3600∥dpi∥A4Tech X7-200MP∥decent membrane keyboard∥Philips 236V3LSB 23" 1080p@71Hz . Sorry for my English.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options... Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Posted July 23, 2015 Author Every since Chrome first came out +major updates I didn't really care about browser speed. Was irrelevant at that point. Now when I got a Macbook I only use Safari. Reason being that other browsers are so very hungry compared to Safari on OS X. I get a lot more battery life using Safari where as hours are shaved off using Chrome. I think it is good they shifted away from speed. Should focus on usability, features and stability. well Chrome is very CPU hungry. They decided to go max speed no matter what, so, sure technically speaking it is the fastest web browser (Although Edge is questioning this...at least on the JavaScript side), but now we are in a mobile world, and as you perfectly noticed, battery life is critical. From benchmark, while Safari was not reviewed, neither Edge as it was not out yet, and still not officially out at the moment of this post, IE11 was the best on battery life, then followed by Firefox, then Opera, and then Chrome being the worst with considerable margins. It would be interesting to see how the market share shift over the years. I know I will probably switch to Edge once extension support arrived to it, because it will have everything I want from Firefox + smooth scrolling and zooming + multi-touch support, and I know that my bookmarks will be synced between devices like Firefox. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options... Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Posted July 23, 2015 Chrome master race. It may not be the Abousulte fastest might not be the lightest but the ecosystem is just to good. Overclocked a laptop display to 120Hz and a simple scroll demolish Chrome right now using Edge. ∥FX8320 4.2Ghz@1.280v& 4.5 Ghz Turbo@1.312v ∥Thermalright HR-02/w TY-147 140MM+Arctic Cooling 120MM∥VRM cooled by AMD Stock Cooler Fan 70MM 0-7200 RPM PWM controlled via Speedfan∥Gigabyte GA990XA-UD3∥Gigabyte HD 7970 SOC@R9 280X∥120GiBee Kingston HyperX 3K∥2TB Toshiba DT01ACA200∥1TB WD Green∥Zalman Z11+Enermax 140MM TB Apollish RED+2X Deepcool 120MM and stock fans running @5V∥Single Channel Patriot 8GB (1333MHZ)+Dual Channel 4GB&2GB Kingston NANO Gaming(1600MHZ CL9)=14GB 1,600 Jigahurtz 10-10-9-29 CR1@1.28V∥Sirtec High Power 500W∥ASUS Xonar DG, Logitech F510∥Sony MDR-XD200∥Edifier X220 + Edifier 3200∥A4Tech XL-747H 3600∥dpi∥A4Tech X7-200MP∥decent membrane keyboard∥Philips 236V3LSB 23" 1080p@71Hz . Sorry for my English.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options... Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now