Jump to content

40" 2160p VA 5000:1 60Hz monitor from Philips - at 850$

eugenius

The first 2160p monitor that makes sense, the BDM4065UC:

http://hexus.net/tech/news/displays/77973-40-inch-philips-brilliance-4k-monitor-launched-549/

 

Just say no to bad scaling and have extra real estate you can actually use for multiple windows.

 

The TFTCentral review: http://www.tftcentral.co.uk/reviews/philips_bdm4065uc.htm

 

PS: Waiting for the DP 1.2a FreeSync 46" version with near zero input lag (this one has ~20ms). It won't be long now ... :)

 

dcf3e40e-9358-467e-b383-64207c3f20c1.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Holy shit that looks like a good deal, it's a VA panel too.

I could see content creators using something like this. 

RIP in pepperonis m8s

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Holy shit that looks like a good deal, it's a VA panel too.

I could see content creators using something like this. 

yeah, VA is IMO better than IPS due to no backlight bleed

AND 60HRZ AT 4k!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

n0ah1897, on 05 Mar 2014 - 2:08 PM, said:  "Computers are like girls. It's whats in the inside that matters.  I don't know about you, but I like my girls like I like my cases. Just as beautiful on the inside as the outside."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yep, that's the kind of stuff that I'm looking for.

 

At ~40" the 4K resolution makes a lot more sense.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

40" in 16:9? No thanks. The Benq B3200PT with its 32" panel was already vertically too high to be comfortable to use. 21:9 would make more sense.

i7 4790K @ 4,6GHz | MSI GTX 1070 Gaming X | 16GB 2400MHz DDR3 | Corsair AX760 | Win 10 | Acer Predator X34A

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

40" in 16:9? No thanks. The Benq B3200PT with its 32" panel was already vertically too high to be comfortable to use. 21:9 would make more sense.

You don't maximize. Solved.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

×