Jump to content

[Leak] AMD Prepares Two Next Generation High End GPUs

NOTE: No site has reported on this until now, so this is essentially breaking news. I expect WCCFTech to pick it up very soon.
UPDATE: VideoCardz & WCCFTech picked the news story up but I'm happy to announce that we've beaten them to the punch!

 

This leak is very interesting, the source is not AMD or any of its board partners, it's actually not really a leak either.
Synapse Design is a company that offers services such as software and development SDKs to help companies like AMD design floor plans for chips. These floor plans are then used to start manufacturing the chips at third party fabs such as TSMC & Globalfoundries.

When a floor plan is finalized that's labeled as a "tape out" in semiconductors. Well Synapse Design just recently released a list of the chips which have been taped out in the last 12 months by a number of their partners.

At the top of the list are two VERY interesting chips, both of which are large GPUs.
ABzFRth.jpg

Synapse Design only has one client which makes GPUs this large & that's AMD.
http://www.synapse-da.com/Corporate/Clients

To put this into perspective the Hawaii GPU powering the R9 290X is 438mm² large & the GK110 GPU powering the 780 Ti is 551mm² large.
According to Synapse Design they have taped out a 500mm²+ GPU & a 350mm²+ GPU.
AMD's largest GPU ever was Hawaii so AMD has never designed a GPU this large before so I'm very interested to see the implications of this.

These two new GPUs might very well end up being AMD's upcoming successors to the 290X and 280X, presumably the 390X and 380X.

28HPM is a TSMC node so these are not the GPUs which AMD reportedly intends to build at Globalfoundries.
The alleged time frame for these chips' release is the second half of 2014 up to the first quarter of 2015 (July 2014 to March 2015)..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

This means nothing to me but I am looking forward to AMD's next cards so...yay?

CPU: Ryzen 9 5900 Cooler: EVGA CLC280 Motherboard: Gigabyte B550i Pro AX RAM: Kingston Hyper X 32GB 3200mhz

Storage: WD 750 SE 500GB, WD 730 SE 1TB GPU: EVGA RTX 3070 Ti PSU: Corsair SF750 Case: Streacom DA2

Monitor: LG 27GL83B Mouse: Razer Basilisk V2 Keyboard: G.Skill KM780 Cherry MX Red Speakers: Mackie CR5BT

 

MiniPC - Sold for $100 Profit

Spoiler

CPU: Intel i3 4160 Cooler: Integrated Motherboard: Integrated

RAM: G.Skill RipJaws 16GB DDR3 Storage: Transcend MSA370 128GB GPU: Intel 4400 Graphics

PSU: Integrated Case: Shuttle XPC Slim

Monitor: LG 29WK500 Mouse: G.Skill MX780 Keyboard: G.Skill KM780 Cherry MX Red

 

Budget Rig 1 - Sold For $750 Profit

Spoiler

CPU: Intel i5 7600k Cooler: CryOrig H7 Motherboard: MSI Z270 M5

RAM: Crucial LPX 16GB DDR4 Storage: Intel S3510 800GB GPU: Nvidia GTX 980

PSU: Corsair CX650M Case: EVGA DG73

Monitor: LG 29WK500 Mouse: G.Skill MX780 Keyboard: G.Skill KM780 Cherry MX Red

 

OG Gaming Rig - Gone

Spoiler

 

CPU: Intel i5 4690k Cooler: Corsair H100i V2 Motherboard: MSI Z97i AC ITX

RAM: Crucial Ballistix 16GB DDR3 Storage: Kingston Fury 240GB GPU: Asus Strix GTX 970

PSU: Thermaltake TR2 Case: Phanteks Enthoo Evolv ITX

Monitor: Dell P2214H x2 Mouse: Logitech MX Master Keyboard: G.Skill KM780 Cherry MX Red

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Interesting, however without any other news regarding the tech behind this chips, I'm more concerned than intrigued: their last cards were already not quite easy to drive as they had fairly large power requirements and heat output. If something hasn't radically changed, this could end up like the equivalent of the FX 9590: too difficult for almost anyone not running custom water loops to handle.

 

Of course they could be sitting on new tech and not just a size increase, let's hope that's the case.

-------

Current Rig

-------

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well i hope they come up with something good and not fail but well i have some faith in AMD (Waiting for R9 390 Tri-x)

My PC

[ I5 4690k (no oc) - Gigabyte Z97 D3H - 8GB Ram - Sapphire R9 280X Vapor-X ]

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Interesting, however without any other news regarding the tech behind this chips, I'm more concerned than intrigued: their last cards were already not quite easy to drive as they had fairly large power requirements and heat output. If something hasn't radically changed, this could end up like the equivalent of the FX 9590: too difficult for almost anyone not running custom water loops to handle.

 

Of course they could be sitting on new tech and not just a size increase, let's hope that's the case.

We already know that AMD's upcoming architecture focuses on efficiency according to the news we have about Tonga, it's AMD's Maxwell if you will.

It's also very unlikely that they would repeat the same mistake again & release GPUs which they can't properly cool with their standard blower cooler.

It's also possible that AMD would have designed a new cooler to go with the larger GPUs as well, we know they did with the 290X but OEMs disliked it because it was an axial design and not a direct exhaust so AMD ended up abandoning it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sweet, new AMD cards to compete with Nvidia mean cheaper prices for everyone !

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

We already know that AMD's upcoming architecture focuses on efficiency according to the news we have about Tonga, it's AMD's Maxwell if you will.

It's also very unlikely that they would repeat the same mistake again & release GPUs which they can't properly cool with their standard blower cooler.

It's also possible that AMD would have designed a new cooler to go with the larger GPUs as well, we know they did with the 290X but OEMs disliked it because it was an axial design and not a direct exhaust so AMD ended up abandoning it.

 

Agreed, but those road maps are first not set in stone and second, not an indication on how much of that is just AMD optimism and how much will be an actual improvement. I concede your points however it's very speculative before we see benchmarks.

-------

Current Rig

-------

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

It's really good to know that AMD is ready to respond to Maxwell with high end offerings, keep Nvidia prices in check.

CPU : i5 3570K @ 4.5Ghz. GPU : MSI Lightning GTX 770 @ 1300mhz. 16GB 1600mhz RAM

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

It's really good to know that AMD is ready to respond to Maxwell with high end offerings, keep Nvidia prices in check.

Exactly, I don't know why some green team fanboys want AMD to fail, they have forgotten that if it weren't for the launch of the R9 290 series, GTX780 would still be sold at 650USD. Competition is good for the industry and benefits us the consumers.

Main Rig: AMD AM4 R9 5900X (12C/24T) + Tt Water 3.0 ARGB 360 AIO | Gigabyte X570 Aorus Xtreme | 2x 16GB Corsair Vengeance DDR4 3600C16 | XFX MERC 310 RX 7900 XTX | 256GB Sabrent Rocket NVMe M.2 PCIe Gen 3.0 (OS) | 4TB Lexar NM790 NVMe M.2 PCIe4x4 | 2TB TG Cardea Zero Z440 NVMe M.2 PCIe Gen4x4 | 4TB Samsung 860 EVO SATA SSD | 2TB Samsung 860 QVO SATA SSD | 6TB WD Black HDD | CoolerMaster H500M | Corsair HX1000 Platinum | Topre Type Heaven + Seenda Ergonomic W/L Vertical Mouse + 8BitDo Ultimate 2.4G | iFi Micro iDSD Black Label | Philips Fidelio B97 | C49HG90DME 49" 32:9 144Hz Freesync 2 | Omnidesk Pro 2020 48" | 64bit Win11 Pro 23H2

2nd Rig: AMD AM4 R9 3900X + TR PA 120 SE | Gigabyte X570S Aorus Elite AX | 2x 16GB Patriot Viper Elite II DDR4 4000MHz | Sapphire Nitro+ RX 6900 XT | 500GB Crucial P2 Plus NVMe M.2 PCIe Gen 4.0 (OS)2TB Adata Legend 850 NVMe M.2 PCIe Gen4x4 |  2TB Kingston NV2 NVMe M.2 PCIe Gen4x4 | 4TB Leven JS600 SATA SSD | 2TB Seagate HDD | Keychron K2 + Logitech G703 | SOLDAM XR-1 Black Knight | Enermax MAXREVO 1500 | 64bit Win11 Pro 23H2

 

 

 

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Good news, But either way,When it comes to new graphics card release, i feel like they're playing the consumers, nothing really much of an advantage overall, it's just 5-10% bump each & every time they release a new one, they keep the whole bread & throw us the tiny bread crumbs... :( Sad actually..

Details separate people.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

There's only so much you can do by increasing the die size, though.

 

It'll be awesome short-term, but long-term the yields might be a problem.

 

Still excited for more powerful GPUs.

I do not feel obliged to believe that the same God who has endowed us with sense, reason and intellect has intended us to forgo their use, and by some other means to give us knowledge which we can attain by them. - Galileo Galilei
Build Logs: Tophat (in progress), DNAF | Useful Links: How To: Choosing Your Storage Devices and Configuration, Case Study: RAID Tolerance to Failure, Reducing Single Points of Failure in Redundant Storage , Why Choose an SSD?, ZFS From A to Z (Eric1024), Advanced RAID: Survival Rates, Flashing LSI RAID Cards (alpenwasser), SAN and Storage Networking

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm guessing larger dies is an indication that we are going to see 28nm for another generation?

Mobo: Z97 MSI Gaming 7 / CPU: i5-4690k@4.5GHz 1.23v / GPU: EVGA GTX 1070 / RAM: 8GB DDR3 1600MHz@CL9 1.5v / PSU: Corsair CX500M / Case: NZXT 410 / Monitor: 1080p IPS Acer R240HY bidx

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

 it's just 5-10% bump each & every time they release a new one, they keep the whole bread & throw us the tiny bread crumbs... :( Sad actually..

 

290x was about 30% faster than the previous flagship 7970Ghz edition.

 

Same with the Geforce Titan compared to the 680.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

290x was about 30% faster than the previous flagship 7970Ghz edition.

 

Same with the Geforce Titan compared to the 680.

Titan and flagship have no place in the same sentence.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

How do we know it's not a new competitor or even an apple GPU for their AIO or laptops?

Grammar and spelling is not indicative of intelligence/knowledge.  Not having the same opinion does not always mean lack of understanding.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

How do we know it's not a new competitor or even an apple GPU for their AIO or laptops?

It can't be a new competitor or an Apple tape out for several reasons.

1- Nobody has the experience to design a GPU this large other than AMD or Nvidia, not even Intel.

2- The tapeouts are just in time for a Maxwell release time-frame so it's obviously either Nvidia or its competitor AMD and since Nvidia isn't a client of Synapse Design this only leaves AMD.

3- Fitting a 500mm or even a 350mm processor, in this case a GPU, in an all-in-one or a laptop is terribly unrealistic, the largest GPU to have ever gone into laptops is Nvidia's GK104 which is 294mm large and the GPU had to be severely underclocked to manage heat, we're talking about a sizable 30%+ underclock.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sounds like a troll attempt to me.

Sounds like their new naming scheme to me.

Why are people liking this? it makes no fuckin sense !

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Why are people liking this? it makes no fuckin sense !

 

It makes perfect sense. 

 

AMD have had some really bad naming schemes in the past (R9 290x2, come on). I was just making a joke that the release date looked complicated, so maybe it was AMD's new naming scheme. (he edited the post to make it easier to understand though).

 

I really didn't think I'd have to explain it. And I'm not sure what @MilkyWhite meant by a troll attempt. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

It can't be a new competitor or an Apple tape out for several reasons.

1- Nobody has the experience to design a GPU this large other than AMD or Nvidia, not even Intel.

2- The tapeouts are just in time for a Maxwell release time-frame so it's obviously either Nvidia or its competitor AMD and since Nvidia isn't a client of Synapse Design this only leaves AMD.

3- Fitting a 500mm or even a 350mm processor, in this case a GPU, in an all-in-one or a laptop is terribly unrealistic, the largest GPU to have ever gone into laptops is Nvidia's GK104 which is 294mm large and the GPU had to be severely underclocked to manage heat, we're talking about a sizable 30%+ underclock.

 

cool, but on the off chance it turns out to be someone other than AMD, I am coming back to say I told you so. :P:)

Grammar and spelling is not indicative of intelligence/knowledge.  Not having the same opinion does not always mean lack of understanding.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

×