Jump to content

Battlefield: HardLine Beta PS4 vs. PC Graphics Comparison

ShadyHost
By ShadyHost
in Member Reviews
 Share
Posted

I guess this counts as a review. 

 

I got codes for both PC and PS4 this morning for the Battlefield: Hardline Beta. So far my experience is that the PC version is a lot more polished. While the FPS dips are a little iffy I feel like it runs smoother overall and is easier to play. The playstation version seems to have a lot of texture pops and performance dips. The loading time on PS4 is also super long and almost unbearable. 

 

Here is the video:

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Link to post
Share on other sites
Posted
  • Author

With the compression on YouTube it is almost hard to tell the difference. Maybe some still frames from the original source recordings would do better?

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Link to post
Share on other sites
Posted

The colours for this game make me feel like it's cartoonish, of course, I'm used to the overly blue/grey hue on normal battlefield games. And of course PC ultra is going to look better than a console, look at the price and hardware differences.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Link to post
Share on other sites
Posted
  • Author

The colours for this game make me feel like it's cartoonish, of course, I'm used to the overly blue/grey hue on normal battlefield games.

I don't know what to think about this game. It seems like they are rushing it out and I doubt it will be as polished as Battlefield 4. 

 

Also the news casting theme is already super old. I don't want a back story in my competitive shooter. The US vs. Russia thing was fine in the previous games was fine as long as it was limited to player model and callout language, but its annoying when I feel like I'm playing Lego City: Undercover every time the match ends. 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Link to post
Share on other sites
Posted

Why the crap arent they working on BF4. I mean it has enough bloody problems by itself and combined with this its gonna be crap.

Work Desktop | CPU: Intel Core i7 4770k | GPU: Quadro K1200 | Motherboard: EVGA Z97 Classified | RAM: Corsair Dominator Platinum 32GB (4x8GB) DDR3-2133Mhz | PSU: Seasonic 750W SS-750KM3 80 PLUS Gold | STORAGE: WD 1TB Se Enterprise Grade Drive & Corsair Neutron NX500 400GB NVMe PCIe  | COOLER: Enermax Liqtech 240 -  5x Noctua NF-F12 iPPC 2000 PWM | CASE: Corsair 600C | OS: Windows 10 Pro | Peripherals: Logitech MX Master 2S -- Logitech K840 -- INTEL X520 10Gb NIC -- 3x Acer H236HL -- Build Log | 

 

Work Server | CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2650 v3 | Model: Cisco UCS C220 M4 (SFF) | RAM: 64GB (4x16GB) Cisco (Samsung) DDR4 2133Mhz | STORAGE: 4x Cisco (Seagate) 900GB 10K 2.5" (RAID 10) - 2x 32GB Cisco FlexFlash Boot Drive (RAID 1) | OS: vSphere 6.7 Enterprise Plus U3 | 

 

Laptop | CPU: Intel Core i7 6700HQ | GPU: Nvidia GTX 960M 2GB GDDR5 | RAM: 32GB (2 x 16GB) DDR4-2400Mhz | STORAGE: 512GB Hynix NVMe | OS: Windows 10 Pro |

 

Gaming Desktop | CPU: Intel Core i7 9700K | GPU: Gigabyte RTX 2080 WINDFORCE 8G  | Motherboard: ASRock Z390 PHANTOM GAMING-ITX | RAM: Ballistix Elite 32GB Kit (16GB x 2) DDR4-3000 | PSU: Silverstone SX700-LPT 700w 80 PLUS Platinum | STORAGE: 2x Samsung 970 PRO 1TB NVMe | COOLER: Noctua NH-L12 | CASE: Louqe Ghost S1 | OS: Windows 10 Pro | Build Log in Progress | 

 

Home Server | CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2690 (Sandy Bridge) | GPU: Quadro P2000 | Motherboard: SUPERMICRO X9SRL-F  | RAM: 64GB (8x8GB) Micron VLP DDR3-1600 ECC | PSU: SUPERMICRO 665W 80 PLUS Bronze | STORAGE: 2x Samsung 860 EVO 500GB (RAID 1) - 4x WD 8TB Ultrastar (RAID 10) - Intel SSD D3-S4510 Series 240GB (BOOT)  | COOLER: Noctua NH-U12DXi4 with 2x Noctua NF-F12 iPPC 3000 PWM | CASE: SUPERMICRO CSE-842TQ-665B 4U | OS: vSphere 6.7 Enterprise Plus U3 | Build Log in Progress |

 

| Pixel 4XL 128GB - Clearly White - Unlocked - Carrier: Visible |

 

| F@H STATS |

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Link to post
Share on other sites
Posted

Why the crap arent they working on BF4. I mean it has enough bloody problems by itself and combined with this its gonna be crap.

Different studio is working on this game.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Link to post
Share on other sites
Posted

I don't know what to think about this game. It seems like they are rushing it out and I doubt it will be as polished as Battlefield 4. 

 

Also the news casting theme is already super old. I don't want a back story in my competitive shooter. The US vs. Russia thing was fine in the previous games was fine as long as it was limited to player model and callout language, but its annoying when I feel like I'm playing Lego City: Undercover every time the match ends. 

9a2bKHZ.gif

Someone told Luke and Linus at CES 2017 to "Unban the legend known as Jerakl" and that's about all I've got going for me. (It didn't work)

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Link to post
Share on other sites
Posted

Different studio is working on this game.

 

Though, it will be interesting to see if the bugs are in the engine. Which would make this game shitty too. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Link to post
Share on other sites
Posted

The colours for this game make me feel like it's cartoonish, of course, I'm used to the overly blue/grey hue on normal battlefield games. And of course PC ultra is going to look better than a console, look at the price and hardware differences.

I don't think the current ultra preset will be the future one, because my 660 can run ultra on 50-60fps constant with dips down to 35 and I think it looks like poop right now compared to BF4

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share
Go to topic listing Member Reviews

×