Jump to content

Why is it nothing seems to disable WebP in newer browsers, but older browsers can?

webP is driving me nuts, it feels like every day another site that used to not use it is now using that accursed format. Plugins/browser settings to disable it aren't working either and still force it through.  
 
Yes yes, I know I can convert it to another format using all sorts of image editors or a plugin, the two problems with that are quality loss since you are converting from a compressed format to a compressed format, and pretty much none of them support animated gifs that get served as webp.  
 
Thing is, everyone is telling me that's just how the image is on the server, but if you use an older browser that is clearly not true. I still had an older version of Waterfox Classic left over on an install on one of my systems, and when I use that, I always get the original jpg, png, gif, whatever the image was. So clearly the servers CAN serve up the original image (and in many cases I can even see .jpg or whatever at the end of a direct image link... but when I try to save it it's webp) and the server can be told to serve up the original image instead of webp, but nobody appears to have made any plugin or gotten any solution for making modern browsers somehow tell the server not to serve them the webp version of an image even though clearly most of these servers can. I always just get people insisting that the original file is in webp format on the server, that it's not possible, or that you need to convert it after downloading it. The fact that Waterfox Classic can get the original non-webp version of the image shows how none of that is true.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Youtube is my favourite, if you disable webp then the site still tries to use them and you get blank images everywhere.

 

What's worse is some photo sharing sites use it and the webp images look garbage compared to the original jpegs.

 

webp and HEIC are spawns of the devil, they destroy image quality. (though admittedly its perfectly serviceable for how Youtube use webp)

Router:  Intel N100 (pfSense) WiFi6: Zyxel NWA210AX (1.7Gbit peak at 160Mhz)
WiFi5: Ubiquiti NanoHD OpenWRT (~500Mbit at 80Mhz) Switches: Netgear MS510TXUP, MS510TXPP, GS110EMX
ISPs: Zen Full Fibre 900 (~930Mbit down, 115Mbit up) + Three 5G (~800Mbit down, 115Mbit up)
Upgrading Laptop/Desktop CNVIo WiFi 5 cards to PCIe WiFi6e/7

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Alex Atkin UK said:

Youtube is my favourite, if you disable webp then the site still tries to use them and you get blank images everywhere.

 

What's worse is some photo sharing sites use it and the webp images look garbage compared to the original jpegs.

 

webp and HEIC are spawns of the devil, they destroy image quality. (though admittedly its perfectly serviceable for how Youtube use webp)

HEIC and WebP are my least favorite formats, I’d rather a TIFF or even a PDF! (Obviously JPEG, PNG, GIF, and SVG are still the best - for different use cases.)

I love making PCPartPicker lists.

If I answer your question (or someone else), please mark it as the answer. 

Please refresh before replying, I like to edit my posts.

 

PC SPECS: Intel i5-12600K, RX 6700 XT, 32GB DDR4 RAM

Favorite cheap but great tech: AMD RX 6700 XT, Yunzii YZ75 Keyboard, Acer Nitro XV272U Vbmiiprx

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Cyber Akuma said:

Thing is, everyone is telling me that's just how the image is on the server, but if you use an older browser that is clearly not true. I still had an older version of Waterfox Classic left over on an install on one of my systems, and when I use that, I always get the original jpg, png, gif, whatever the image was. So clearly the servers CAN serve up the original image (and in many cases I can even see .jpg or whatever at the end of a direct image link... but when I try to save it it's webp) and the server can be told to serve up the original image instead of webp, but nobody appears to have made any plugin or gotten any solution for making modern browsers somehow tell the server not to serve them the webp version of an image even though clearly most of these servers can. I always just get people insisting that the original file is in webp format on the server, that it's not possible, or that you need to convert it after downloading it. The fact that Waterfox Classic can get the original non-webp version of the image shows how none of that is true.

Depends on the server.
In late 2023 we (not disclosing which company) updated all of our servers to automatically convert newly uploaded images to webp and serve that only.
Also, we've gone through old images and converted them to webp as well, just with different presets so that the perceived quality doesn't change much.
Obviously, this was not done by hand, everything was automated... So a small percentage might end up looking like garbage but the vast majority should look fine.


Webp from our perspective is a win-win. Less storage is needed, and faster load times for our clients.

 

1 hour ago, Cyber Akuma said:

Yes yes, I know I can convert it to another format using all sorts of image editors or a plugin, the two problems with that are quality loss since you are converting from a compressed format to a compressed format, and pretty much none of them support animated gifs that get served as webp.  

Compression isn't an issue, lossy compression to lossy compression is.

FYI webp has both lossless and lossy modes...
Don't blame the format, blame the services for opting to save as much space & bandwith as possible. 😄

 

Also, animated gifs?
Now that is a format that needs to die already, looks like a turd and is huge.

 

2 hours ago, Cyber Akuma said:

(and in many cases I can even see .jpg or whatever at the end of a direct image link... but when I try to save it it's webp)

Just because it has .jpeg in the URL doesn't mean the image you are seeing is .jpg.

I can put prettyimage.whatever and it can load just fine in your browser.

Here is an example:

https://vignette.wikia.nocookie.net/cardfight/images/9/9b/BT08-074EN-C.jpg

image.png.454d7d53eb1cff4609b65762cee3dd09.png

Look at the Content-Type and Content-Disposition headers.

VGhlIHF1aWV0ZXIgeW91IGJlY29tZSwgdGhlIG1vcmUgeW91IGFyZSBhYmxlIHRvIGhlYXIu

^ not a crypto wallet

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, PowerPCFan said:

HEIC and WebP are my least favorite formats, I’d rather a TIFF or even a PDF! (Obviously JPEG, PNG, GIF, and SVG are still the best - for different use cases.)

...as if .TIF/.TIFF or PDF are bad options? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, da na said:

...as if .TIF/.TIFF or PDF are bad options? 

Well I don’t love TIFF and PDF isn’t even an image format so it’s terrible for images


I know TIFF can be a great format, but PNG will always be my #1 favorite. 

I love making PCPartPicker lists.

If I answer your question (or someone else), please mark it as the answer. 

Please refresh before replying, I like to edit my posts.

 

PC SPECS: Intel i5-12600K, RX 6700 XT, 32GB DDR4 RAM

Favorite cheap but great tech: AMD RX 6700 XT, Yunzii YZ75 Keyboard, Acer Nitro XV272U Vbmiiprx

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just now, PowerPCFan said:

Well I don’t love TIFF and PDF isn’t even an image format so it’s terrible for images


I know TIFF can be a great format sometimes, but PNG will always be my #1 favorite. 

True, PDF is not great for images.

TIFF is great for lossless files with stupid high quality... I love my 400MB 4K images lol

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, da na said:

I use "Don't Accept WebP" extension on Firefox and I've never had a problem with it. 

 

Didn't work for me, and apparently it's been asking for a lot of permissions lately.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just deal with it, the format is more than 13 years old. 😆

🙂

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

×