Is Rtx 3060 12gb better or RTX 4060 ti 8 gb better

[Sourav_Prakash5]

i will take an rtx card so i was about to take an msi rtx 3060 ->https://www.amazon.in/gp/product/B08WPRMVWB/ref=ewc_pr_img_4?smid=A1A1JBOUJEFFNA&psc=1 BUT, then i saw an rtx 4060 ti that is better and little bit more price -> https://www.amazon.in/MSI-GeForce-Ventus-128-bit-Graphic/dp/B0C7W8GZMJ/ref=sr_1_5?crid=18KRU1A3NJKEW&keywords=rtx%2B4060&qid=1691328701&sprefix=rtx%2B406%2Caps%2C239&sr=8-5&th=1 then i finalized it but then after checking everything its fps was good everything was good but its 128 bit and other is 192 bit now i want to compare these things -:

-> is it 128 bit better than 192 bit

->it is 8 gb but other is 12 (this seems ok cause it gives better performance)

->its performance

i compared and 4060 was better in all cases then these so please help me select

[ImWilly]

Since you're purchasing new RTX series instead of upgrading from 20x0 or 30x0 series, I would say go for 4060 series

Frame Gen, DLSS3.5 is a great boost for 40x0 series card (although it depends on the game developer and usually applicable on newer AA/AAA games)

 

We live in a age where 'AI core' is on early development, which means that new every iteration of RTX GPU, it will have massive improvement of AI core which will somehow make the previous iteration of the GPU obsolete

(i.e. Frame Gen only available on RTX 40x0)

[PcBeExpensive]

17 minutes ago, Sourav_Prakash5 said:

i will take an rtx card so i was about to take an msi rtx 3060 ->https://www.amazon.in/gp/product/B08WPRMVWB/ref=ewc_pr_img_4?smid=A1A1JBOUJEFFNA&psc=1 BUT, then i saw an rtx 4060 ti that is better and little bit more price -> https://www.amazon.in/MSI-GeForce-Ventus-128-bit-Graphic/dp/B0C7W8GZMJ/ref=sr_1_5?crid=18KRU1A3NJKEW&keywords=rtx%2B4060&qid=1691328701&sprefix=rtx%2B406%2Caps%2C239&sr=8-5&th=1 then i finalized it but then after checking everything its fps was good everything was good but its 128 bit and other is 192 bit now i want to compare these things -:

-> is it 128 bit better than 192 bit

->it is 8 gb but other is 12 (this seems ok cause it gives better performance)

->its performance

i compared and 4060 was better in all cases then these so please help me select

why are you only going with Nvidia cards? The 6700 XT would be the best option in this case.

[Angusticlavii]

2 minutes ago, PcBeExpensive said:

why are you only going with Nvidia cards? The 6700 XT would be the best option in this case.

 This! I feel like you get a lot more by going with AMD at that price. The 4060Ti is just too cut down and the 3060 is a great card for its age but still gets beaten by the 6700XT.

[Sourav_Prakash5]

4 minutes ago, PcBeExpensive said:

why are you only going with Nvidia cards? The 6700 XT would be the best option in this case.

no because for playing in rtx official nvidia rtx is only good and best

[Sourav_Prakash5]

ok thanks, now i will go for the 40 series only

[Angusticlavii]

The problem is enrtry level rtx cards do not really have the performance to play games with raytracing other than minecraft rtx maybe. 

[PcBeExpensive]

16 minutes ago, Sourav_Prakash5 said:

no because for playing in rtx official nvidia rtx is only good and best

No it is not... Please do research before blurting stuff like this. AMD cards are still very good and the 6700 XT performs better than both those cards while being cheaper.

[PDifolco]

30 minutes ago, Sourav_Prakash5 said:

no because for playing in rtx official nvidia rtx is only good and best

RTX what ? If you mean ray tracing the 4060 aren't good at it anyway

[Tegneren]

57 minutes ago, Sourav_Prakash5 said:

-> is it 128 bit better than 192 bit

->it is 8 gb but other is 12 (this seems ok cause it gives better performance)

In general higher bitrate is better, meaning 192 bit is better than 128.

more vram is better where everything else is equal. 

There are a few games where a weaker card with more vram can outperform otherwise stronger cards. An example is The Last Of Us Part 1. For the most part the 12GB vram on the 3060 is currently wasted, but it seems that newer games is more and more VRAM hungry, especially those ported from consoles

[Dedayog]

When even Tech Deals says the 4060Ti is garbage, I listen.  

 

At that price point AMD all day every day.

[tkitch]

in a vacuum:  

The 3060 is entirely too competative with the 4060.  The extra RAM, and the better bandwidth means it punches up compared to the nerfed 4060.

 

The 4060's only real advantage is the updated cores, and support for the DLSS3+ spec.

 

At the pricepoint tho, I'd buy an AMD Card, and get better FPS, unless you're doing something that requires NVidia tech.

[jaslion]

https://www.amazon.in/Sapphire-Pulse-Radeon-Gaming-Triple/dp/B08YNQ4ZM1/ref=mp_s_a_1_2?crid=3FSX90YVZSEP2&keywords=rx+6700+xt&qid=1693230313&sprefix=rx+6700+xt%2Caps%2C151&sr=8-2

 

This is what you want. Its better than all the suggested cards.

 

Also ray tracing on a 60 series card is like simply not happening. Its not powerfull enough and barelt holds 60 even with high performance mode dlss which makes the game look flat out worse.

 

You simply wont be playing with rtx on in anything else than minecraft and the worst thing about that is that even in minecraft ray tracing is so heavy it doesnt work well at all