Jump to content

120mm Fan Comparison

RevGAM

Here are some statistical comparisons of some of the more powerful 120mm fans. Data are based on manufacturer's published statistics. Note that manufacturers don't all use the same testing, don't usually report their fan curves to the public, and some of them lie.

 

All fans are PWM. The links to each are in the first list.

 

Note: The Delta listed is 80mm3! I put it in for fun.

 

Note: Some are deeper than 25mm.

Note: mmAq is the same thing as mm H₂O. Where necessary, I converted from imperial (e.g. inches) to metric. I used Convert Units. Hopefully, I didn't make (m)any errors. 1f604.png Some companies use minutes instead of hours, so I relied on my calculator for the very complex equation.  :hysterical: 

 

So much for the usual suspects being the champs, aside from the A12x25 being the quietest.

 

In order of static pressure (mm H20) (with RPM).  (higher is better)

  1. Noctua NF-A12x25 (2000) 2,34 mm H₂O
  2. EK-Meltemi 120ER (1800) 2.75 mm H₂O
  3. be quiet! Silent Wings 4 120mm PWM high-speed (2500) 3.96 mm H₂O
  4. Thermalright TL-B12 Extrem (3150) 5.0 mm H₂O
  5. be quiet! Silent Wings Pro 4 (3000) 5.31 mm H₂O
  6. Phanteks T30-120 (3000) 7.11 mm H₂O
  7. EK-Furious Meltemi 120 (3500) 7.13 mm H₂O [discontinued, so buy it if you see it!]
  8. Noctua NF-F12 iPPC 3000 PWM (3000) 7,63 mm H₂O
  9. SilverStone Technology FHS 120X (4000) 11.66 mm H₂O
  10. Gelid Gale Mining (3500)* 12.0 mm H₂O
  11. Gelid Gale Mining Extreme (6000)* 24.0 mm H₂O
  12. Delta GFB0812ES-E (16,300) 149.82 mm H₂O

* The link for both is the same.

 
In order of airflow (m3/h) (with RPM).  (higher is better)
  1. Noctua NF-A12x25 (2000) 102.1 m³/h 
  2. EK-Meltemi 120ER (1800) 106 m³/h
  3. be quiet! Silent Wings 4 120mm PWM high-speed (2500) 130.31 m³/h
  4. be quiet! Silent Wings Pro 4 (3000) 142.5 m³/h
  5. Phanteks T30-120 (3000) 171.60 m³/h
  6. Noctua NF-F12 iPPC 3000 PWM (3000) 186,7 m³/h
  7. Gelid Gale Mining (3500) 186.89 m³/h 
  8. Thermalright TL-B12 Extrem (3150) 190.29 m³/h
  9. EK-Furious Meltemi 120 (3500) 205 m³/h [discontinued, so buy it if you see it!]
  10. Delta GFB0812ES-E (16,300) 231.18 m³/h
  11. SilverStone Technology FHS 120X (4000) 244.62 m³/h
  12. Gelid Gale Mining Extreme (6000) 331.31 m³/h 
 
In order of noise volume (dB(A)) (with RPM).  (lower is better)
  1. Noctua NF-A12x25 (2000) 22.6 dB(A)
  2. be quiet! Silent Wings 4 120mm PWM high-speed (2500) 31.2 dB(A)
  3. EK-Meltemi 120ER (1800) 31.3 dB(A)
  4. be quiet! Silent Wings Pro 4 (3000) 36.9 dB(A)
  5. Phanteks T30-120 (3000) 39.7 dB(A)
  6. Thermalright TL-B12 Extrem (3150) 40.5 dB(A)
  7. Noctua NF-F12 iPPC 3000 PWM (3000) 43,5 dB(A)
  8. Gelid Gale Mining (3500) 45 dB(A)
  9. SilverStone Technology FHS 120X (4000) 51.8 dB(A)
  10. Gelid Gale Mining Extreme (6000) 60 dB(A)
  11. EK-Furious Meltemi 120 (3500) 60.9 dB(A) [discontinued, so buy it if you see it!]
  12. Delta GFB0812ES-E (16,300) 79.0 dB(A)
 
"Scores" (points 1-5; higher is better)
  1. Thermalright TL-B12 Extrem                                                0
  2. Noctua NF-F12 iPPC 3000 PWM                                         1 (only due to SP)
  3. be quiet! Silent Wings Pro 4                                                 2 (only due to noise level)
  4. Gelid Gale Mining                                                           2 (only due to SP)
  5. Phanteks T30-120                                                                     2 (noise level and SP)
  6. EK-Furious Meltemi 120                                                          2 (SP & AF)
  7. be quiet! Silent Wings 4 120mm PWM high-speed   3 (only due to noise level)
  8. EK-Meltemi 120ER                                                                     3 (only due to noise level)
  9. Noctua NF-A12x25                                                        4 (only due to noise level)
  10. SilverStone Technology FHS 120X                                     5 (SP & AF)
  11. Delta GFB0812ES-E                                                                  6 (SP & AF)
  12. Gelid Gale Mining Extreme                                                     7 (SP & AF)
 
Being on the list doesn't grant points. If you can devise a better "scoring" system, please tell me about it; I'd like to improve this part! Red 4, orange 3, blue 2, green 1, grey 0. Perhaps a wider point-spread to better differentiate? A 5th color? Different ranges for the colors? Different point systems for each category? Please share your thoughts!
 
As you can see, there is a relationship between RPM and the 3 measurements in these charts, but other factors including blade design, number, spacing, materials, hub size, depth, AF and SP also apply.
 
If someone wants to provide the SP/dB(A) and AF/dB(A),  and/or graphs, please do!
 
Is there another fan that should be on this list because it's exceptional? Let me know!
 
Edit:

Interestingly, when Computer Tech & More tested several fans with noise normalization, the bq! SWP4 120 was quieter than even the A12x25, despite the published noise levels. Just goes to show that what's published isn't necessarily true.

https://youtu.be/C4xf5hrm02M

Edited by RevGAM
Added notes and scores, improved formatting, and links.

I've been using computers since around 1978, started learning programming in 1980 on Apple IIs, started learning about hardware in 1990, ran a BBS from 1990-95, built my first Windows PC around 2000, taught myself malware removal starting in 2005 (also learned on Bleeping Computer), learned web dev starting in 2017, and I think I can fill a thimble with all that knowledge. 😉 I'm not an expert, which is why I keep investigating the answers that others give to try and improve my knowledge, so feel free to double-check the advice I give.

My phone's auto-correct is named Otto Rong.🤪😂

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, RevGAM said:

 Here are some statistical comparisons of some of the more powerful 120mm fans. Data are based on manufacturer's published statistics.

 

Note: Some are deeper than 25mm.

 

Note: mmAq is the same thing as mm H₂O. Where necessary, I converted from imperial (e.g. inches) to metric. Hopefully, I didn't make (m)any errors. 😄


So much for the usual suspects being the champs, aside from the A12x25 being the quietest.

 

In order of static pressure (mm H20) (with RPM).  (higher is better)

Noctua NF-A12x25 (2000) 2,34 mm H₂O
EK-Meltemi 120ER (1800) 2.75 mm H₂O
be quiet! Silent Wings 4 120mm PWM high-speed (2500) 3.96 mm H₂O
Thermalright TL-B12 Extrem (3150) 5.0 mm H₂O
be quiet! Silent Wings Pro 4 (3000) 5.31 mm H₂O

Phanteks T30-120 (3000) 7.11 mm H₂O

EK-Furious Meltemi 120 (3500) 7.13 mm H₂O [discontinued, so buy it if you see it!]
Noctua NF-F12 iPPC 3000 PWM (3000) 7,63 mm H₂O
SilverStone Technology FHS 120X (4000) 11.66 mm H₂O
Gelid Gale Mining (3500) 12.0 mm H₂O
Gelid Gale Mining Extreme (6000) 24.0 mm H₂O
Delta GFB0812ES-E (30,000) 149.82 mm H₂O
 
In order of airflow (m3/h) (with RPM).  (higher is better)
Noctua NF-A12x25 (2000) 102,1 m³/h
EK-Meltemi 120ER (1800) 106 m³/h
be quiet! Silent Wings 4 120mm PWM high-speed (2500) 130.31 m³/h
be quiet! Silent Wings Pro 4 (3000) 142.5 m³/h
Phanteks T30-120 (3000) 171.60 m³/h
Thermalright TL-B12 Extrem (3150) 190.29 m³/h
Noctua NF-F12 iPPC 3000 PWM (3000) 186,7 m³/h
Gelid Gale Mining (3500) 186.89 m³/h
EK-Furious Meltemi 120 (3500) 205 m³/h [discontinued, so buy it if you see it!]
Delta GFB0812ES-E (30,000) 231.18 m³/h
SilverStone Technology FHS 120X (4000) 244.62 m³/h
Gelid Gale Mining Extreme (6000) 331.31 m³/h
 
In order of noise volume (dB(A)) (with RPM).  (lower is better)
Noctua NF-A12x25 (2000) 22.6 dB(A)
be quiet! Silent Wings 4 120mm PWM high-speed (2500) 31.2 dB(A)
EK-Meltemi 120ER (1800) 31.3 dB(A)
be quiet! Silent Wings Pro 4 (3000) 36.9 dB(A)
Phanteks T30-120 (3000) 39.7 dB(A)
Thermalright TL-B12 Extrem (3150) 40.5 dB(A)
Noctua NF-F12 iPPC 3000 PWM (3000) 43,5 dB(A)
Gelid Gale Mining (3500) 45 dB(A)
SilverStone Technology FHS 120X (4000) 51.8 dB(A)
Gelid Gale Mining Extreme (6000) 60 dB(A)
EK-Furious Meltemi 120 (3500) 60.9 dB(A) [discontinued, so buy it if you see it!]
Delta GFB0812ES-E (30,000) 79.0 dB(A)
 
As you can see, there is a relationship between RPM and the 3 measurements in these charts, but other factors including blade design, number, spacing, materials, hub size, depth, AF and SP also apply.
 
If someone wants to provide the SP/dB(A) and AF/dB(A), please do!

Thanks for sharing.

There is approximately 99% chance I edited my post

Refresh before you reply

__________________________________________

ENGLISH IS NOT MY NATIVE LANGUAGE, NOT EVEN 2ND LANGUAGE. PLEASE FORGIVE ME FOR ANY CONFUSION AND/OR MISUNDERSTANDING THAT MAY HAPPEN BECAUSE OF IT.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Interesting I would have expected more performance from the silent wings 4 pro. They're charging crazy money for them.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, TeraSeraph said:

Interesting I would have expected more performance from the silent wings 4 pro. They're charging crazy money for them.

Keep in mind that those are only the statistics provided by the companies. The question is: Are the numbers valid and are all of them actually at max RPM, don't you think?

I've been using computers since around 1978, started learning programming in 1980 on Apple IIs, started learning about hardware in 1990, ran a BBS from 1990-95, built my first Windows PC around 2000, taught myself malware removal starting in 2005 (also learned on Bleeping Computer), learned web dev starting in 2017, and I think I can fill a thimble with all that knowledge. 😉 I'm not an expert, which is why I keep investigating the answers that others give to try and improve my knowledge, so feel free to double-check the advice I give.

My phone's auto-correct is named Otto Rong.🤪😂

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

48 minutes ago, RevGAM said:

Keep in mind that those are only the statistics provided by the companies. The question is: Are the numbers valid and are all of them actually at max RPM, don't you think?

Every fan company "lies" about their dB values, because they never give values that are generated in actual use case. The fans are usually tested in anechoic chambers designed to damp any resonance or reflections which drastically reduces the sound levels that it produces. They also almost never quote how close or far away the sound level was taken so it's pretty much whatever value they want to stick on the fan spec sheet. "Our fan is only producing 17.8 dB when sitting on a piece of damping foam in an anechoic chamber taken from 5 feet away."  Like how is that even relevant?

 

This is why I quote how far away and in what position my readings were taken from so that it has proper context. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, TeraSeraph said:

Every fan company "lies" about their dB values, because they never give values that are generated in actual use case. The fans are usually tested in anechoic chambers designed to damp any resonance or reflections which drastically reduces the sound levels that it produces. They also almost never quote how close or far away the sound level was taken so it's pretty much whatever value they want to stick on the fan spec sheet. "Our fan is only producing 17.8 dB when sitting on a piece of damping foam in an anechoic chamber taken from 5 feet away."  Like how is that even relevant?

 

This is why I quote how far away and in what position my readings were taken from so that it has proper context. 

You'll get no argument from me! 🙂

I've been using computers since around 1978, started learning programming in 1980 on Apple IIs, started learning about hardware in 1990, ran a BBS from 1990-95, built my first Windows PC around 2000, taught myself malware removal starting in 2005 (also learned on Bleeping Computer), learned web dev starting in 2017, and I think I can fill a thimble with all that knowledge. 😉 I'm not an expert, which is why I keep investigating the answers that others give to try and improve my knowledge, so feel free to double-check the advice I give.

My phone's auto-correct is named Otto Rong.🤪😂

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

I know that fan depth affects SP. Does it also affect AF? @TeraSeraph @Lurking @NorKris

I've been using computers since around 1978, started learning programming in 1980 on Apple IIs, started learning about hardware in 1990, ran a BBS from 1990-95, built my first Windows PC around 2000, taught myself malware removal starting in 2005 (also learned on Bleeping Computer), learned web dev starting in 2017, and I think I can fill a thimble with all that knowledge. 😉 I'm not an expert, which is why I keep investigating the answers that others give to try and improve my knowledge, so feel free to double-check the advice I give.

My phone's auto-correct is named Otto Rong.🤪😂

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

26 minutes ago, RevGAM said:

I know that fan depth affects SP. Does it also affect AF? @TeraSeraph @Lurking @NorKris

The slim fans tend to move less air per RPM but aren't necessarily poor performing, for example the A12x15 is fairly comparable to the F12 in terms of unrestricted airflow, and is far quieter. Note the relatively low blade advance ratio for the slim fans.

Slimcompare.thumb.png.f60a4a29ecfeb7340d03f1cab544fd15.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, TeraSeraph said:

They tend to move less air per RPM but aren't necessarily poor performing, for example the A12x15 is fairly comparable to the F12 in terms of unrestricted airflow, and is far quieter. 

Slimcompare.thumb.png.f60a4a29ecfeb7340d03f1cab544fd15.png

I'm confused. AFAIK, both have a depth of 25mm.

I've been using computers since around 1978, started learning programming in 1980 on Apple IIs, started learning about hardware in 1990, ran a BBS from 1990-95, built my first Windows PC around 2000, taught myself malware removal starting in 2005 (also learned on Bleeping Computer), learned web dev starting in 2017, and I think I can fill a thimble with all that knowledge. 😉 I'm not an expert, which is why I keep investigating the answers that others give to try and improve my knowledge, so feel free to double-check the advice I give.

My phone's auto-correct is named Otto Rong.🤪😂

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

55 minutes ago, RevGAM said:

I know that fan depth affects SP. Does it also affect AF? @TeraSeraph @Lurking @NorKris

To further answer this question, up to a certain point it increases airflow at the cost of higher amperage and wattage, then losses start to set in as the air gains more and more angular velocity with deeper blades. Contra rotating fans with stators start to be more effective once you reach a certain depth of fan. There's only so much work you can impart on the air with an axial fan before it is going completely sideways. This is the same reason turbine engines are staged in sets of blades and stators to impart more work on the air for a given depth.

 

Higher advance ratio fans will tend to spill more air to the outsides if they do not have a stator built in. The Noctua S12A is a good example of this with it's relatively aggressive blade angle. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, TeraSeraph said:

To further answer this question, up to a certain point it increases airflow at the cost of higher amperage and wattage, then losses start to set in as the air gains more and more angular velocity with deeper blades. Contra rotating fans with stators start to be more effective once you reach a certain depth of fan. There's only so much work you can impart on the air with an axial fan before it is going completely sideways. This is the same reason turbine engines are staged in sets of blades and stators to impart more work on the air for a given depth.

 

Higher advance ratio fans will tend to spill more air to the outsides if they do not have a stator built in. The Noctua S12A is a good example of this with it's relatively aggressive blade angle. 

Thanks for the response! Can you clarify the "point in increases"?

 

Not a term I'd seen regarding fans before, and I'm not really sure how to apply it, since it how far an aircraft moves in one, full revolution of the prop. Yes, I have a few fans that will move across my desk if I let them, but I'm pretty sure I don't want them moving my computer. =)

advance ratioclick for a larger image

Advance Ratio: The ratio between the distance an aircraft moves from one revolution of a propeller(s), under specified conditions, and the propeller's diameter. It is the ratio of the forward speed divided by the product of rotational speed and the diameter. All propeller performances are compared at the same advance ratio.

 

At what depth does the stator become useful?

I've been using computers since around 1978, started learning programming in 1980 on Apple IIs, started learning about hardware in 1990, ran a BBS from 1990-95, built my first Windows PC around 2000, taught myself malware removal starting in 2005 (also learned on Bleeping Computer), learned web dev starting in 2017, and I think I can fill a thimble with all that knowledge. 😉 I'm not an expert, which is why I keep investigating the answers that others give to try and improve my knowledge, so feel free to double-check the advice I give.

My phone's auto-correct is named Otto Rong.🤪😂

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

My next question is how does LxW (from 120 to 140) affect airflow? @TeraSeraph @Lurking @NorKris

I've been using computers since around 1978, started learning programming in 1980 on Apple IIs, started learning about hardware in 1990, ran a BBS from 1990-95, built my first Windows PC around 2000, taught myself malware removal starting in 2005 (also learned on Bleeping Computer), learned web dev starting in 2017, and I think I can fill a thimble with all that knowledge. 😉 I'm not an expert, which is why I keep investigating the answers that others give to try and improve my knowledge, so feel free to double-check the advice I give.

My phone's auto-correct is named Otto Rong.🤪😂

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, RevGAM said:

My next question is how does LxW (from 120 to 140) affect airflow?

i dont know. what i know is: 

never look at the ratings from the manufacurers. 

The 12's have more pressure than the 14's

pressure often dues not matter that much before u go custom loop cooling (higher FPI rads) 

and the best fans made (overall) is 12's 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

33 minutes ago, NorKris said:

i dont know. what i know is: 

never look at the ratings from the manufacurers. 

The 12's have more pressure than the 14's

pressure often dues not matter that much before u go custom loop cooling (higher FPI rads) 

and the best fans made (overall) is 12's 

Please qualify why 120s are better than 140s.

I've been using computers since around 1978, started learning programming in 1980 on Apple IIs, started learning about hardware in 1990, ran a BBS from 1990-95, built my first Windows PC around 2000, taught myself malware removal starting in 2005 (also learned on Bleeping Computer), learned web dev starting in 2017, and I think I can fill a thimble with all that knowledge. 😉 I'm not an expert, which is why I keep investigating the answers that others give to try and improve my knowledge, so feel free to double-check the advice I give.

My phone's auto-correct is named Otto Rong.🤪😂

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

22 minutes ago, RevGAM said:

Please qualify why 120s are better than 140s.

if i ask u: find a match / similarfan  as  the T30 and 12x25.  what would u say? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, RevGAM said:

Thanks for the response! Can you clarify the "point in increases"?

It would depend on the blade design but once you reach a certain depth you're just spinning air inside the duct vs actually pushing it in a linear fashion.

So say if you had a narrow but long space to put a fan like the top of a traffic tunnel, but you want to move a lot of air in the axis of the fans. You would want a lot of fan depth with a small diameter which is where stators and contra rotating fans that correct the flow are crucial for efficiency. 

Huge Ventilation Fans Just Like an Airliner's Engines: Understanding the  Ventilation System Essential for a Safe Tunnel Environment | Business  Solutions | Products & Solutions | Feature Story | Panasonic Newsroom Global

4 hours ago, RevGAM said:

 

Not a term I'd seen regarding fans before, and I'm not really sure how to apply it, since it how far an aircraft moves in one, full revolution of the prop. Yes, I have a few fans that will move across my desk if I let them, but I'm pretty sure I don't want them moving my computer. =)

advance ratioclick for a larger image

Advance Ratio: The ratio between the distance an aircraft moves from one revolution of a propeller(s), under specified conditions, and the propeller's diameter. It is the ratio of the forward speed divided by the product of rotational speed and the diameter. All propeller performances are compared at the same advance ratio.

 

At what depth does the stator become useful?

If you flip your point of reference so that the fan is static, the advance ratio can also be viewed as how much air is moved for one revolution of the blades. Higher advance ratios will move more air for every revolution of the blade. 

 

Higher advance ratios are generally better for performance as long as you can drive the blades on the fan. Since energy is conserved, the extra movement of air has to come from what is supplied by the motor. 

 

Stators or correction grids are always useful at any depth since they remove the angular velocity of the airstream. The NF-F12 has a fairly good example of real stators on a fan.

 

A fan with stators straightens the airflow as it leaves the fan, making for better pressure through fins, and also a more focused airstream. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, RevGAM said:

My next question is how does LxW (from 120 to 140) affect airflow? @TeraSeraph @Lurking @NorKris

140mm will have a higher advance ratio simply because they have a larger diameter. They're going to move more air for every revolution because of the greater tip velocity, duct area, and blade size. Increases in airflow are exponential with fan diameter until you begin to cause flow separation at the tips or even reach supersonic tip velocities. For example the recent turbofan sizes have gotten larger and larger because of the efficiencies gained.
A Boeing 777-300ER's GE90 engine's size compared to a person. : r/aviation
Noctua has a really nice list of their fans with specs. Take a look at how much more air the 200mm moves for only turning 800 RPM vs the 140mm at 1500 RPM, and then the same pattern repeats with the 140mm vs 120mm, and so on. Each step up in size is a massive gain in airflow per revolution.
https://noctua.at/en/products/fan

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

47 minutes ago, TeraSeraph said:

140mm will have a higher advance ratio simply because they have a larger diameter. They're going to move more air for every revolution because of the greater tip velocity, duct area, and blade size. Increases in airflow are exponential with fan diameter until you begin to cause flow separation at the tips or even reach supersonic tip velocities. For example the recent turbofan sizes have gotten larger and larger because of the efficiencies gained.

Noctua has a really nice list of their fans with specs. Take a look at how much more air the 200mm moves for only turning 800 RPM vs the 140mm at 1500 RPM, and then the same pattern repeats with the 140mm vs 120mm, and so on. Each step up in size is a massive gain in airflow per revolution.
https://noctua.at/en/products/fan

Yes but in this test by STS (youtuber) 

image.thumb.png.861ebeca3fbcb4ee5888a4ca70c29842.png

we can see that in the most important test (Temp to noise) the fan favorite 12x25 beats out the rest.  but too be fair, the way he did the test is not mentioned. but still  the noise to performance done on the best 12's out there is insane 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, NorKris said:

Yes but in this test by STS (youtuber) 

image.thumb.png.861ebeca3fbcb4ee5888a4ca70c29842.png

we can see that in the most important test (Temp to noise) the fan favorite 12x25 beats out the rest.  but too be fair, the way he did the test is not mentioned. but still  the noise to performance done on the best 12's out there is insane 

From the 20 different 120mm fans I've tested, nothing beats the A12x25 for noise to performance, especially in the higher RPM ranges where it will push a lot more air and still be almost silent. A lot of these tests also ignore the rated lifespan of the fan which is 150K hours or 17 years of estimated run time 24 hours around the clock. As well as the power efficiency of the fan motors which is more impressive when you start to look at portable applications outside of desktop PCs. If I could only have one model of fan to use for a build it would be the A12x25

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, TeraSeraph said:

From the 20 different 120mm fans I've tested, nothing beats the A12x25 for noise to performance

only T30  ofc, but thats a 3cm  one so

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, NorKris said:

only T30  ofc, but thats a 3cm  one so

I don't really count the T30 or the Lian Li (120mmx28) fans in my testing because they're not true to the 120mm x 25mm form factor. It's not a fair comparison and there's a LOT of compatibility issues with both of those fan models because they're thicker. I do however count 120mm x 15mm form factor because it's well established and there's a fair number of models out there. Maybe if others start making 120mm x 30mm fans I will reconsider, but right now I'm more likely to examine some 120mm x 38mm fans as they're also more common than the 30mm FF.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, TeraSeraph said:

I don't really count the T30 or the Lian Li (120mmx28) fans in my testing because they're not true to the 120mm x 25mm form factor. It's not a fair comparison and there's a LOT of compatibility issues with both of those fan models because they're thicker. I do however count 120mm x 15mm form factor because it's well established and there's a fair number of models out there. Maybe if others start making 120mm x 30mm fans I will reconsider, but right now I'm more likely to examine some 120mm x 38mm fans as they're also more common than the 30mm FF.

so u dont like them thicc ey? 😛 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

One day I will mount up my 120x38s again, but not today 🙂

 

Right now I am not using a single high performance fan and it is a nice change.. so quiet 😄

 

I like T30s because they perform close to my 120x38s, but are much quieter, even at 3K. Most consumer fans are a bit of a joke, and are quite weak.

AMD R7 5800X3D | Thermalright Frost Commander 140, TY-143
Asus Crosshair VIII Dark Hero | 32GB G.Skill Trident Z @ 3733C14
Zotac 4070 Ti Trinity OC @ 3045/1495 | WD SN850, SN850X, SN770
Seasonic Vertex GX-1000 | Fractal Torrent Compact RGB, Many CFM's

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

×